Journal of Gynecologic Oncology

Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (대한부인종양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumor size >2 cm: trends and characteristics in the United States

  • Matsuo, Koji (Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California) ;
  • Machida, Hiroko (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine) ;
  • Mandelbaum, Rachel S. (Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California) ;
  • Mikami, Mikio (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine) ;
  • Enomoto, Takayuki (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine) ;
  • Roman, Lynda D. (Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California) ;
  • Wright, Jason D. (Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons)
  • Received : 2018.06.16
  • Accepted : 2018.07.13
  • Published : 2018.11.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21442
  2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (US). NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology. Cervical cancer [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2017 [cited 2018 May 8]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cervical.pdf.
  3. Machida H, Blake EA, Eckhardt SE, Takiuchi T, Grubbs BH, Mikami M, et al. Trends in single women with malignancy of the uterine cervix in United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e24. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e24
  4. Matsuo K, Machida H, Grubbs BH, Sood AK, Gershenson DM. Trends of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e15. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e15
  5. Matsuo K, Ross MS, Machida H, Blake EA, Roman LD. Trends of uterine carcinosarcoma in the United States. J Gynecol Oncol 2018;29:e22. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e22
  6. Cui RR, Chen L, Tergas AI, Hou JY, St Clair CM, Neugut AI, et al. Trends in use and survival associated with fertility-sparing trachelectomy for young women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:1085-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002613
  7. Wethington SL, Sonoda Y, Park KJ, Alektiar KM, Tew WP, Chi DS, et al. Expanding the indications for radical trachelectomy: a report on 29 patients with stage IB1 tumors measuring 2 to 4 centimeters. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013;23:1092-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e318296034e
  8. Tseng JH, Aloisi A, Sonoda Y, Gardner GJ, Zivanovic O, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Less versus more radical surgery in stage IB1 cervical cancer: a population-based study of long-term survival. Gynecol Oncol 2018;150:44-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.571
  9. Pareja R, Rendon GJ, Vasquez M, Echeverri L, Sanz-Lomana CM, Ramirez PT. Immediate radical trachelectomy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery for patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors 2cm or larger: a literature review and analysis of oncological and obstetrical outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:574-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.051
  10. Ramirez RT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Phase III randomized trial of laparoscopic or robotic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: LACC Trial. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists; 2018 Mar 24-27; New Orleans, LA. Chicago, IL: Society of Gynecologic Oncology; 2018.

Cited by

  1. Characteristics and outcomes of reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: trachelectomy vs hysterectomy vol.219, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.020
  2. Tailoring radicality in early cervical cancer: how far can we go? vol.30, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e30
  3. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy vol.220, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.038
  4. Intestinal metastasis after total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: A case report vol.28, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gore.2019.02.001
  5. Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate vol.156, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.021
  6. Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: A national study in the United States vol.157, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.015
  7. Safety evaluation of abdominal trachelectomy in patients with cervical tumors ≥2 cm: a single-institution, retrospective analysis vol.31, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e41
  8. 2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging vol.40, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200013
  9. Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review vol.13, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051008