DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Temperature Effects on Fracture Toughness Parameters for Pipeline Steels

  • Chanda, Sourayon (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta) ;
  • Ru, C.Q. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta)
  • Received : 2018.03.04
  • Accepted : 2018.05.04
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The present article showcases a temperature dependent cohesive zone model (CZM)-based fi nite element simulation of drop weight tear test (DWTT), to analyse fracture behavior of pipeline steel (PS) at different temperatures. By co-relating the key CZM parameters with known mechanical properties of PS at varying temperature, a temperature dependent CZM for PS is proposed. A modified form of Johnson and Cook model has been used for the true stress-strain behavior of PS. The numerical model, using Abaqus/CAE 6.13, has been validated by comparing the predicted results with load-displacement curves obtained from test data. During steady-state crack propagation, toughness parameters (such as CTOA and CTOD) were found to remain fairly constant at a given temperature. These toughness parameters, however, show an exponential increase with increase in temperature. The present paper offers a plausible approach to numerically analyze fracture behavior of PS at varying temperature using a temperature dependent CZM.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : NSERC (Natural Science and Engineering Research Council) of Canada

References

  1. Amstutz, B. E., et al. (1997). Effects of mixed mode I/II loading and grain orientation on crack initiation and stable tearing in 2024-T3 aluminum. Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, 27, 105-125.
  2. Borvik, T., et al. (2001). A computational model of viscoplasticity and ductile damage for impact and penetration. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 20(5), 685-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01157-3
  3. Capelle, J., et al. (2013). Design based on ductile-brittle transition temperature for API 5L X65 steel used for dense CO 2 transport. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 110, 270-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.08.009
  4. Capelle, J., et al. (2014). Role of constraint on the shift of ductile-brittle transition temperature of subsize Charpy specimens. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 37(12), 1367-1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12212
  5. Chanda, S. (2015). temperature effects on dynamic fracture of pipeline steel. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta.
  6. Chanda, S. & Ru, C. Q. (2015a). Cohesive zone model for temperature dependent fracture analysis of pipeline steel. In Proceedings of 25th Canadian congress on applied mechanics (pp. 1-4). London, Ontario, Canada.
  7. Chanda, S. & Ru, C. Q. (2015b). FEA modeling of dynamic fracture of pipeline steel at low temperatures. In 9th European solid mechanics conference. Leganes-Madrid, Spain.
  8. Clausen, A. H., et al. (2004). Flow and fracture characteristics of aluminium alloy AA5083-H116 as function of strain rate, temperature and triaxiality. Materials Science and Engineering A, 364(1-2), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.027
  9. Coseru, A., Capelle, J., & Pluvinage, G. (2013). On the use of Charpy transition temperature as reference temperature for the choice of a pipe steel. In 5th international conference on computational mechanics and virtual engineering (pp. 1-10). Brasov, Romania.
  10. Dunbar, A., et al. (2014). Simulation of ductile crack propagation and determination of CTOAs in pipeline steels using cohesive zone modelling. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 37(6), 592-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12143
  11. Ebrahimi, F., & Seo, H. K. (1996). Ductile crack initiation. Acta Metallurgica, 44(2), 831-843.
  12. Holmquist, T., & Johnson, G. (1991). Determination of constants and comparison of results for various constitutive models. Journal de Physique IV, 1(C3), 853-860.
  13. Johnson, G., & Cook, W. (1985). Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 21(I), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9
  14. Kang, K.-W., et al. (2009). Experimental investigation on static and fatigue behavior of welded sm490a steel under low temperature. International Journal of Steel Structures, 9(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249483
  15. Lam, P.-S., Kim, Y., & Chao, Y. J. (2005). Crack tip openinig displacement and angle for a growing crack in carbon steel. In ASME pressure vessels and piping division conference (pp. 1-8). Denver, Colorado, USA.
  16. Lee, D. H., et al. (2016). Seismic fragility analysis of a buried gas pipeline based on nonlinear time-history analysis. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(1), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-016-3017-9
  17. Martinez-Palou, R., et al. (2011). Transportation of heavy and extraheavy crude oil by pipeline: A review. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 75(3-4), 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2010.11.020
  18. Newman, J. C., James, M. A., & Zerbst, U. (2003). A review of the CTOA/CTOD fracture criterion. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 70(3-4), 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00125-X
  19. Park, K., & Paulino, G. H. (2013). Cohesive zone models : A critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 64(2011), 20.
  20. Ren, Z. J., & Ru, C. Q. (2013). Numerical investigation of speed dependent dynamic fracture toughness of line pipe steels. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 99, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.12.016
  21. Salvini, P., Fonzo, A., & Mannucci, G. (2003). Identification of CTOA and fracture process parameters by drop weight test and finite element simulation. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 70(3-4), 553-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00137-6
  22. Shim, D. J., Wilkowski, G., Duan, D. M., & Zhou, J. (2010). Effect of fracture speed on ductile fracture resistance-part 1: Experimental. In Proceedings of the 8th international pipeline conferencence. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  23. Sorem, W. A., Dodds, R. H., & Rolfe, S. T. (1991). Effects of crack depth on elastic plastic fracture toughness. International Journal of Fracture, 47(2), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00032572
  24. Wang, X., Roy, G., Xu, S., & Tyson, W. R. (2007). Numerical simulation of ductile crack growth in pipeline steels. In ASME pressure vessels and piping division (pp. 1-7). San Antonio, Texas, USA.
  25. Wang, Y. J. & Ru, C. Q. (2015). Determination of cohesive zone model's parameters based on the uniaxial stress-strain curve. In Proceedings of the XIII international conference on mathematics and computational mechanics. Barcelona, Spain.
  26. Wang, Y. J., & Ru, C. Q. (2016). Determination of two key parameters of a cohesive zone model for pipeline steels based on uniaxial stress-strain curve. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 163, 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.06.017
  27. Yu, P. S., & Ru, C. Q. (2015). Strain rate effects on dynamic fracture of pipeline steels: Finite element simulation. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 126-127, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.12.001