DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Recognition between Expert Group and General People Group about Geo-technologies in the Future

미래 지질자원기술에 대한 전문가와 일반인 인식 비교

  • 김찬석 (청주대학교 미디어콘텐츠학부)
  • Received : 2018.08.15
  • Accepted : 2018.10.18
  • Published : 2018.10.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the expert group's recognition with general people's recognition about the image of the future on geo-technoloies. The survey targeting to 215 experts and to 598 people had been completed from July to August, 2017 by a research firm. The research result showed that energy was selected as the first priority by expert group and climate environment, geologic environment, mineral resources and material, living place, space-earth research, and the fourth industrial revolution were sequence ranked by experts. Also, it was analyzed that climate environment was recognized as the first priority and geologic environment, energy, mineral resources and material, living place, space-earth research, the fourth industrial revolution were ranked in sequence by general people group.

본 연구는 지질자원기술의 미래상에 대하여 전문가 집단과 일반인 집단의 인식을 비교하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위하여 설문조사를 실시 하였다. 설문조사는 일반인 598명과 전문가 215명 등 두 그룹으로 나눠 조사 전문 회사에 의해 2017년 7~8월 진행되었다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 전문가들은 지질자원기술의 7가지 미래상에 대하여 에너지, 기후환경, 지질환경, 광물자원 재료, 삶의 터전, 우주지구 탐구, 4차 산업혁명 순으로 중요도의 우선순위를 두고 있는 것으로 조사되었다. 일반인들은 7가지 지질자원기술 미래상에 대하여 기후환경, 지질환경, 에너지, 광물자원 재료, 삶의 터전, 우주지구 탐구, 4차 산업혁명 순으로 중요도의 우선순위를 인식하고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, C.S., Lee. H.S. and Kim, S.Y. (2012). An analysis on the social diffusion of geo-technologies outcome : comparison of recognition between experts and nonexperts. Economic and Environmental Geology, v.45, n.3, p.335-346. https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2012.45.3.335
  2. Kim, C.S. (2014). A study on the differences in the recognition of a geosciences and mineral resources institution's brand factors between the internal and external public. Economic and Environmental Geology, v.47, n.6, p.657-671. https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2014.47.6.657
  3. Kim, C.S., Lee, H.S., Kim, S.Y. and Lee, J.Y. (2012). A study on the communication strategy and message for geo-technology commercialization. Economic and Environmental Geology, v.45, n.4, p.431-440. https://doi.org/10.9719/EEG.2012.45.4.431
  4. KIGAM (2017). The image of the future of geostechnology in 2050. https://policy.kigam.re.kr/0201