Journal of the Korean earth science society (한국지구과학회지)

The Korean Earth Science Society (한국지구과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study of the 'Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses' as a Method of Earth Scientific Inquiry

지구과학의 탐구 방법으로서 '복수 작업가설의 방법'의 특징에 관한 탐색적 연구

  • Oh, Phil Seok (Department of Science Education, Gyeongin National University of Education)
  • 오필석 (경인교육대학교 과학교육과)
  • Received : 2018.05.28
  • Accepted : 2018.09.20
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the method of multiple working hypotheses (MMWH) as a method of earth scientific inquiry was applied in a context of abductive reasoning about the formation of a rock with a specific structure, and the characteristics of MMWH revealed in the reasoning process were explored. Participants were 31 senior undergraduate students enrolled in a course in a university of education. As part of the course, the participants performed abductive inquiry with multiple working hypotheses about the formation of a rock. The students were asked to record both the processes and results of their reasoning in sketchbooks. The content of the students' sketchbook reports was analyzed according to the principle of analytic induction. Results demonstrated four assertions. First, the participants' working hypotheses were suggested in the use of resource models, and the adaption of the resource models often occurred in this process. Second, the perceptual properties of evidence influenced the activation of the resource models. Third, the kinds of observed evidence and the different interpretations of evidence resulted into different judgments on working hypotheses. Fourth, sometimes new hypotheses were generated by the combination of alternative hypotheses. Implications of these findings for earth science education and relevant research were discussed.

본 연구에서는 지구과학의 탐구 방법으로서 복수 작업가설의 방법을 특정한 구조를 지닌 암석의 형성 과정에 대한 귀추적 추론 과정에 적용하고, 그 속에서 드러난 복수 작업가설의 방법의 특징을 탐색하였다. 연구 참여자는 한교육대학교에서 진행된 수업에 참여한 31명의 4학년 학생들이었으며, 이들은 수업 활동의 일환으로 문제 암석의 형성 과정에 대한 복수의 작업가설을 상정하고 그것들을 함께 고려하여 귀추적 탐구를 수행하였다. 학생들의 추론 과정과 결과를 스케치북 보고서에 기록하게 하고, 보고서의 내용을 분석적 귀납의 원리에 따라 분석하여 4가지 연구 주장을 도출하였다. 첫째, 학생들의 작업가설은 자원 모델을 바탕으로 상정되고 이 과정에서 종종 자원 모델의 변형이 일어난다. 둘째, 자원 모델의 활성화에는 증거의 지각적 특성이 영향을 미친다. 셋째, 관찰한 증거의 종류와 증거에 대한 다른 해석이 작업가설들에 대한 서로 다른 판단을 초래한다. 넷째, 종종 대안적인 가설들이 결합하여 또 다른 가설이 만들어진다. 이러한 연구 결과가 지구과학 교육과 관련 연구에 시사하는 점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amsel, E. and Brock, S., 1996, The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cognitive Development, 11, 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90016-7
  2. Chamberlin, T.C., 1890, The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science, New Series, 148 (3671), 754-759.
  3. Chamberlin, T.C., 1904, The methods of the earth sciences. Popular Science Monthly, 66, 66-75.
  4. Chinn, C.A. and Malhotra, B.A., 2002, Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual changes impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.327
  5. Elliott, L. and Brook, B.W., 2007, Revisiting Chamberlin: Multiple working hypotheses for the 21st century. BioScience, 57(7), 608-614. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570708
  6. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ, 271 p.
  7. Gray, R., 2014, The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry. Science Education, 98, 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21098
  8. Harrowitz, N., 1983, The body of the detective model: Charles S. Peirce and Edgar Allan Poe. In Eco, U. and Sebeok, T.A. (eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 179-197.
  9. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., and O'Loghlin, M., 1988, The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 249 p.
  10. Kwon, Y.J., Jeong, J.S., Kang, M.J., and Kim, Y.S., 2003, A grounded theory on the process of generating hypothesis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(5), 458-469. (In Korean with an English abstract)
  11. Merriam, S.B., 1988, Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 248 p.
  12. Oh, P.S., 2011, Characteristics of abductive inquiry in earth science: An undergraduate case study. Science Education, 95, 409-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20424
  13. Oh, P.S., 2016, Roles of models in abductive reasoning: A schematization through theoretical and empirical studies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 551-561. (In Korean with an English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0551
  14. Oh, P.S., 2017, The roles and importance of critical evidence (CE) and critical resource models (CRMs) in abductive reasoning for earth scientific problem solving. Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 426-446. (In Korean with an English abstract) https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2017.41.3.426
  15. Oh, P.S., Jon, W.S., and Yoo, J.-M., 2007, Analysis of scientific models in the earth domain of the 10th grade science textbooks. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 28(4), 393-404. (In Korean with an English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.4.393
  16. Oh, P.S. and Kim, C.-J., 2005, A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(5), 610-623. (In Korean with an English abstract)
  17. Oh, P.S. and Oh, S.J., 2011, A study on the processes of elaborating hypotheses in abductive inquiry of preservice elementary school teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(1), 128-142. (In Korean with an English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.1.128
  18. Park, J., 2006, Modelling analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 469-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500404540
  19. Park, J., Chang, B., Yoon, H., and Pak, S.J., 1993, Middle school student's evidence evaluation about light and shadow. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(2), 135-145. (In Korean with an English abstract)
  20. Park, J., Kim, I., Lee, M., and Kim, M., 1998, Students' responses on the supporting or conflicting evidences on their preconceptions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 18(3), 283-296. (In Korean with an English abstract)
  21. Park, J. and Pak, S., 1997, Students' responses to experimental evidence based on perceptions of causality and availability of evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199701)34:1<57::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-N
  22. Rubin, A.E., and Jerde, E.A., 1990, The method of multiple working hypotheses for chocolate lovers and petrologists. Journal of Geological Education, 38, 243-245. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-38.3.243
  23. Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R., and DeVault, M.L., 2016, Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guide and resource (4th ed.). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 401 p.