References
- Jeong HW, Min JW, Kim JM, et al. Investigation of Physical Imaging Properties in Various Digital Radiography System. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2017;40(3):363-370. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.3.02
- Jeong HW, Min JW, Kim JM, et al. Performance Characteristic of a CsI(Tl) Flat Panel Detector Radiography System. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2012;35(2):109-117.
- ICRU (International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements) Report No 41: Modulation Transfer Function of Screen-Film Systems. Bethesda. 1986.
- Kim KW, Jeong HW, Min JW, et al. Measurement of Image Quality According to the Time of Computed Radiography System. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2015;38(4):365-374. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2015.38.4.05
- Min JW, Jeong HW, Kim KW, et al. Evaluation of Image Quality for Various Electronic Portal Imaging Devices in Radiation Therapy. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2015;38(4):451-461. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2015.38.4.16
- Kim KW, Jeong HW, Min JW, et al. Evaluation of the Modulation Transfer Function for Computed Tomography by Using American Association Physics Medicine Phantom. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2016;39(2):193-198. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.2.09
- Kim KW, Jeong HW, Min JW, et al. Evaluation of the Performance Characteristic for Mammography by Using Edge device. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2016;39(3):415-420. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.3.16
- Fujita H, Tasai DY, Itoh T. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(1):34-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.126908
- IEC (International Electro-technical Commission) 62220-1. Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices Part 1: determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva. 2003.
- Antonuk LE, Boudry J, Huang W. Demonstration of megavoltage and diagnostic X-ray imaging with hydrogenated amorphous silicon arrays. Med. Phys. 1992;19(6):1455-1466. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596802
-
Granfors PR, Aufrichtig R. Performance of a
$41{\times}41cm^2$ amorphous silicon flat panel X-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. Med. Phys. 2000;27(6):1324-1333. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.599010 - Finc C, Hallscheidt PJ, and Noeldge G. Clinical comparative study with a large-area amorphous silicon flat-panel detector: image quality and visibility of anatomic structures on chest radiography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001;178(2):481-486.
- Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, et al. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):923-929. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.4.1810923
- Schaetzing R. Computed radiography technology. Proceeding of Radiological Society of North America. 2003;10.
- Dobbins JT, Ergun DL, Rutz L, et al. DQE (f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. Med. Phys. 1995;22(10):1581-1593. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597627
- Dobbins III JT, Samei E, Ranger NT, Chen Y. Inter comparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Medical Physics. 2006;33:1466-1475. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2188816