A Study of the Usefulness of Dual Energy CT in Gout Patients

Dual Energy CT를 이용한 통풍 환자 검사의 유용성 고찰

  • Moon, Il-Bong (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Kwan (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Kwak, Jong-Gil (Department of Public Health and Medicine, Dongshin University Graduate School) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Cheol (Social Disaster Management Division, Jeollanamdo Provincial Government) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Hyun (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University)
  • 문일봉 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 최성관 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 동경래 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 곽종길 (동신대학교 보건의료학과) ;
  • 김광철 (전라남도 도청 사회재난과) ;
  • 김미현 (광주보건대학교 방사선과)
  • Received : 2018.06.29
  • Accepted : 2018.09.11
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

CT is an imaging tomography using the original is useful to monitor the disease, such as bone fractures due to indicate the calcified tissue inflammation evaluated as not suitable for three-dimensional imaging the three-dimensional image. Among the various contents of these CT, we evaluated the usefulness of Dual Energy CT gout used for ventilation. The patients diagnosed with gout targeting Conventional CT examination and DECT 6 patients who underwent examination by Scan data is sent to the post refomation LEONARDO were using the gout software. Then reconstructing the 3D image using the Gout CTM CA, analyzed, and compared to previously used methods the new DECT. As a result, it was found that DECT is a more accurate location of the disease and the diagnosis is possible than the conventional method.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Gwangju Health University

References

  1. Arromdee E, Michet CJ, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM and Gabriel SE. 2002. epidemiology of gout: is the in-cidence rising. J. Rheumatol. 29(11):2403-2406.
  2. Dieppe P and Swan A. 1999. Identification of crystals in synovial fluid. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 58(5):261-263.
  3. Grahame R and Scott JT. 1970. Clinical survey of 354 patients with gout. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 29(5):461-468. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.29.5.461
  4. Lee CH, Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee YM, Kim HJ, Song JH and Juhng SK. 2011. Dual-energy CT as a new diagnostic tool for gout. J. Rheum. Dis. 18(2):137-141. https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2011.18.2.137
  5. Monu JU and Pope TL Jr. 2004. Gout: a clinical and radio-logic review. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 42(1):169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8389(03)00158-1
  6. Perkins P and Jones AC. 1999. Gout. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 58(5): 611-617.
  7. Schumacher HR. 1996. Crystal-induced arthritis: an overview. Am. J. Med. 100(2):S46-52.
  8. Schumacher HR Jr., Becker MA, Edwards NL, Palmer WE, MacDonald PA, Palo W and Joseph-Ridge N. 2006. Magnetic resonance imaging in the quantitative assessment of gouty tophi. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 60(4):408-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00853.x
  9. Song JS. 2010. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of gout. J. Korea Med. Assoc. 53(8):695-703. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2010.53.8.695
  10. Terkeltaub RA. 2003. Clinical practice: gout. N. Engl. J. Med. 349(17):1647-1655. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp030733
  11. Thiele RG and Schlesinger N. 2007. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology 46(7):1119-1121.
  12. Yoo B. 1995. Serum uric acid levels in Korean adult population and their correlates. J. Korean. Rheum. Assoc. 2(2):60-68.