DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Task-Oriented Effects of Various Exercise Learning (Dart Throwing) on Proprioception

과제지향적 다양한 운동학습(다트던지기)이 고유감각에 미치는 영향

  • Yang, Byung-Il (Department of Physical therapy, Suwon Convalescent Hospital) ;
  • Park, Hyeong-Ki (Department of Physical Therapy, Masan University)
  • 양병일 (수원요양병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 박형기 (마산대학교 물리치료과)
  • Received : 2018.09.20
  • Accepted : 2018.10.08
  • Published : 2018.11.07

Abstract

Purpose In this study, 45 students were divided into task - oriented group, task - oriented intermittent group, and continuous group, and the effect of each variable on learning was changed to angle of the arms' we checked. Methods This study was conducted for 45 days from March 13 to 18, 2017 for five days in the 20 generals living in Changwon city. Dart and goniometer were used for the measurement. In the exercise program, darts were placed on a smooth, hard surface of 1.5M height and the distance to the subject was set 1.5m away. In the dart throw practice, all three groups were marked with an elbow flexion $30^{\circ}$ on the wall, and the subjects were instructed to throw the dart at that point. Results Comparisons between groups showed significant differences between the continuous task-oriented training group and the intermittent task-oriented training group and the control group at the end of training (*** P <0.001). Conclusion This study showed that the intermittent task-oriented training method showed the highest effect (*** P <0.001), which proved that the intermittent method is the most effective exercise method among the three groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Schmidt RA, Young DE. Augmented kinematic information feedback for skill learning: A new research paradigm. Journal of Motor Behavior. 1991;23(1):13-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1991.9941590
  2. Winsten CJ. Relative Frequency of information Feedback in Motor Performance and Learning. Los Angeles. University of California, Los Angeles; 1988.
  3. Lee TD, Genovese ED. Distribution of practice in motor skill: learning and performance effects reconsidered. 1988;59:59-67.
  4. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005.
  5. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke. 2000;31(6):1210-1216. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.6.1210
  6. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance. Oxford, United Kingdom:Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 1998.
  7. Vearrier LA, Langan J, Shumway-Cook A et al. An intensive massed practice approach to retraining balance poststroke. Gait Posture. 2005;22:154-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.09.001
  8. Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM. Potential of a suite of robot computer assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-6
  9. Seo HJ, Kim S, Kwon HC et al. The Effect of Intermittent and Continuous Visual and Auditory Feedback at Standing Balance Training in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy. 2009;7(3):62-1.
  10. Emken JL, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005;13:33-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843173
  11. Park JM, Lee SH. The effect of knee joint position sense through close and open kinetic chain exercise on the proprioception and balance ability of elderly people. The Journal of Korean Society for Neurotherapy. 2018;22(3):27-32.
  12. Yang BI, Hwang BY. Effects of knee extensor muscle fatigue of chronic patients in the balance. The Journal of Korean Society for Neurotherapy. 2014;18(1):37-44.