Places of Memory in the Collective Memory of Locals in Janghang, Korea

  • Park, Jae-min (Dept. of Human Environmental Design, Cheongju University) ;
  • Kim, Moohan (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2018.11.23
  • Accepted : 2018.12.13
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Place memory is a new way of seeing as a new concept of cultural landscape research. Various research works and discussions have recently spread in landscape studies. In particular, the, which is visible and material, is a medium in which collective memory is embedded in place memory. The purpose of this study is to extract places of memory from the collective memory of residents of Janghang, Korea, and to visualize it through semantic relations. For this purpose, semi-standardized interviews (34 persons) were conducted with residents, and frequency analysis and semantic network analysis were used. As a result, the interviewees recalled only 127 places in Janghang that existed between 1920 and 2010. Locals remember the city based on places of memory. This means that the city could be illustrated according to specific places that are frequently mentioned. For instance, the top 25 places (top 20%) explain 65.6% of all the places in the city, and the top 39 places (top 30.8%) could describe 78.7% of the places. Some places are referred to more frequently when they are in the city's symbolic landscape, and the city's identity is projected on them. Some places were mentioned only infrequently but were nevertheless very important places by which to understand Janghang. These places of memory have not appeared in the documentary records before, which shows the value of the collective memory of the locals and the effectiveness of the interviewing method. In the clustering of the semantic network, six groups of places appeared. The local residents remembered the modern industrial city and recalled it in connection with the sites of daily life. This shows the possibility of looking not only at public memory and famous heritage as a macro history but also at daily life and meaningful places as a micro history about locals. This study has significance as an initial research that identified and visualized places of memory from the perspective of local residents. Such an approach could be useful in the study of everyday life and the conservation of modern heritage.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea

References

  1. Atkinson, R..Shiffrin, R.(1968). Human Memory: A Proposed System and Its Control Processes. Psychology of learning and motivation. 2: 89-195.
  2. Baddeley, A..Eysenck, A..Anderson, M.(2009). Memory. In What is Memory? New York: Psychology Press. pp. 1-40.
  3. Bastian, M..Heymann, S..Jacomy, M.(2009). Gephi: an Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. ICWSM. 8: 361-362.
  4. Bartlett, F.(1932). Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  5. Cha, M..Kweon, S.(2015). A Semantic Network Analysis of "Creative Economics" in News Frame. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies. 59(2): 88-120.
  6. Chang, T.(2005). Place, Memory and Identity: Imagining 'New Asia'. Asia Pacific Viewpoin., 46(3): 247-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2005.00286.x
  7. Cicero, M.(1954). Cicero Ad C. Herennium de Ratione Dicendi: (Rhetorica ad Herennium) (Vol. 403). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 1-50.
  8. Craik, K.(1967). The Nature of Explanation (1943). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 50-61.
  9. Cresswell, T.(2004). Place: A Short Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. pp. 85-93.
  10. De Alba, M.(2012). A Methodological approach to the Study of Urban Memory: Narratives about Mexico City. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(2): 27.
  11. De La Torre, M.(2002). Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage: Research Report. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Conservation Institute. pp. 5-30.
  12. Dong, J..Zou, G.(2012). Semantic Network Method of Urban Design Scheming. In Advanced Materials Research (Vol. 368, pp. 3384-3387). Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications.
  13. Ebbinghaus, H.(1913). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology (No. 3). Michigan: University Microfilms.
  14. Halbwachs, M.(1992). On Collective Memory. 1941. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 21-34.
  15. Heath, P.(2005). A New Theory on Place Memory. Australian Journal of Parapsychology. 5(1): 40-58.
  16. Jahanbakhsh, H..Koumleh, M..Alambaz, F.(2015). Methods and Techniques in Using Collective Memory in Urban Design: Achieving Social Sustainability in Urban Environments. Cumhuriyet Science Journal. 36(4): 19-31.
  17. Jeong, N...Jeong, M.(2016). Planning for Mother's Garden of memory in Seoul Garden Festival. Journal of Recreation and Landscape. 10(2): 75-81.
  18. Jeong, S.(2009). A Study on the Area-based Conservation System for Historic and Cultural Environments. Urban Design. 10(4): 233-248.
  19. Kim, K..Park, J.(2013). Re-thinking Modern Seoul. Seoul: Seohae Publishing. pp. 194-215.
  20. Kwon, Y...Kim, K..Lee, H.(2012). Floral Design Approach for the Installation of Landscape Art Work. Journal of Recreation and Landscape. 6(2): 95-109.
  21. Lee, K...Kim, J.(2014). Master Plan for Yun Bong-Gil Historical Public Park Applying the Narrative Movie Composition Method. Journal of Recreation and Landscape. 8(2): 75-84.
  22. Lewicka, M.(2008). Place Attachment, Place Identity, and Place Memory: Restoring the Forgotten City Past. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 28(3): 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.001
  23. Lynch, K.(1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 1-13.
  24. Nasar, J.(1998). The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp. 41-53.
  25. Nora, P(1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Memoire. Representations 7-24.
  26. Park, E.(2015). Design of the Seoul Artisan Garden -Cultural Heritage of the Artisan and Its Spatial Representation-. Journal of Recreation and Landscape. 9(4): 101-109.
  27. Park, H..Leydesdorff, L.(2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A Computer Program for the Analysis of Korean Text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 6(5): 1377-1387.
  28. Park, J..Hong, Y.(2016). Interpretation of Taereung National Training Center as a Place of Memory. Modern Korea Journal of East Asian Landscape Studies. 10(1): 15-28.
  29. Park, J..Kim, M.(2014). An Interpretation of the Cultural Landscape by Using Adjectives on Place Memory of Local People. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 42(2): 10-18.
  30. Park, J..Kim, M.(2016). Interpretation of Taereung National Training Center as a Place of Memory in Modern Korea. Journal of East Asian Landscape Studies. 10(1): 15-27.
  31. Park, J..Sung, J.(2012). A Study on the Industrial Heritage in Janghang. The Geographical Journal of Korea. 46(2): 107-120.
  32. Relph, E.(1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion. pp. 1-61.
  33. Rollero, C..De Piccoli, N.(2010). Place Attachment, Identification and Environment Perception: An Empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30(2): 198-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.003
  34. Rossi, A..Eisenman, P.(1982). The Architecture of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. pp. 2-11.
  35. Schama, S.(1996). Landscape and Memory. 1995. New-York: Alfred and Knopf. pp. 3-20.
  36. Spering, G.(1960). The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentation. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 74(11): 1-29.
  37. Squire, L.(1992). Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory: Multiple Brain Systems Supporting Learning and Memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 4(3): 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.232
  38. Taylor, K.(2008). Landscape and Memory: Cultural Landscapes, Intangible Values and Some thoughts on Asia. 16th ICOMOS General Assembly and International Symposium: 'Finding the spirit of place - between the tangible and the intangible'. 29 Sept - 4 Oct 2008, Quebec, Canada. [Conference or Workshop Item]. http://www.international.icomos.org/quebec2008/cd/
  39. Till, K.(2003). Places of Memory. In: J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Toal (Eds.), A Companion to Political Geography (pp. 289-301). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  40. Topcu, K..Topcu, M.(2012). Visual Presentation of Mental Images in Urban Design Education: Cognitive Maps. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 51: 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.208
  41. Tuan, Y.(1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 149-160.
  42. Tulving, E.(1986). Episodic and Semantic Memory: Where Should We Go from Here? Behavioral and Brain Science. 9(3): 573-577. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00047257
  43. Wang, F..Li, W..Liu, Y..Cai, H.(2016). Measurement and Application of Urban Memory Related to Historic Areas in Beijing. In Urbanization and Locality (pp. 27-54). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  44. Wasserman, S..Iacobucci, D.(1991). Statistical Modelling of One Mode and Two Mode Networks: Simultaneous Analysis of Graphs and Bipartite Graphs. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 44(1): 13-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1991.tb00949.x
  45. Withers, C.(1996). Place, Memory, Monument: Memorializing the Past in Contemporary Highland Scotland. Cultural Geographies. 3(3): 325-344.
  46. Wright, E.(2005). Rhetorical Spaces in Memorial Places: The Cemetery as a Rhetorical Memory Place/Space. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 35(4): 51-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391322
  47. Yates, F.(1966). The Art of Memory. UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul. pp. 1-40.
  48. Yea, S.(2002). Rewriting Rebellion and Mapping Memory in South Korea: The (re) Presentation of the 1980 Kwangju Uprising through Mangwol-dong Cemetery. Urban Studies. 39(9): 1551-1572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220151655
  49. Yeoh, B.(2003). Contesting Space in Colonial Singapore: Power Relations and the Urban Built Environment in Colonial Singapore. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press. pp. 219-235.