The Journal of shipping and logistics (해운물류연구)

The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics (한국해운물류학회)
권호 표지

Imabari Maritime Cluster: A Case Analysis of Japan Maritime Cluster

이마바리해사클러스터의 사례분석

  • 한종길 (성결대학교 동아시아물류학부)
  • Received : 2018.11.23
  • Accepted : 2018.12.27
  • Published : 2018.12.31

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Following the collapse of Hanjin Shipping, building a strong maritime cluster is one of the policy measures for the re-construction of the Korean shipping and shipbuilding industries. Thus, the purpose of this study is to develop a policy alternative for building a maritime cluster. Using Porter's diamond models, we analyzed the Imabari maritime cluster of Japan, which is characterized by cooperation between key industries, such as shipping, shipbuilding, shipbuilding equipment, and finance. The Imabari Maritime Cluster is equipped with complete domestic demand conditions and related supporting industry conditions. Although the strengths of the production conditions include excellent family-based management and strong support from regional administration and banks which develops independency among cluster members, the weak points include the absense of robust port services and difficulty in recruiting young talent in small and medium-sized cities. We can confirm that the company's strategy is focused on stable management, rather than a short-term view.

한진해운 도산이후, 한국해운의 재건을 위한 방안의 하나로 제시된 해운조선 상생 발전에 대한 실천적 대안의 하나인 해사클러스터 구축에 대한 정책대안 마련이 본 논문의 목적이다. 이를 위하여 가장 성공적인 해사클러스터를 구축하고 해운 조선 조선기자재 금융 등 핵심구성요소들간에 상생을 위한 협력이 이루어지고 있는 일본의 이마바리해사클러스터에 대하여 포터의 다이어몬드모델을 활용하여 분석하였다. 이마바리 해사클러스터는 해운과 조선간의 협력을 바탕으로 하는 국내완결형 수요조건과 관련지원산업조건을 갖추었다. 생산요소조건은 가족경영을 기반으로 하는 뛰어난 해운경영자와 이들을 하나로 묶어주는 행정과 금융을 기반으로 하고 있지만 지방중소도시에 위치한 근본적인 약점으로 우수한 인재확보나 대형항만부재로 인한 항만서비스업의 부진은 약점으로 들 수 있다. 기업전략조건은 단기적인 시점보다는 장기적인 시점에서 안정경영을 중시하고 있다는 점을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 나주몽(2004), 일본의 지역클러스터의 형성과 발전전략, 한국지역개발학회지, 제16권 제1호, pp.45-73
  2. 복득규 (2002), 산업클러스터 국내의 사례와 발전전략, SERI CEO Information, 제373호.
  3. 이원영 (2010), 기술혁신의 경제학, 생능출판사.
  4. 임덕순 (2008), 광교테크노밸리 운영전략과 과제, 경기개발연구원.
  5. 임덕순 (2010), 경기도 지식서비스산업 육성방안, 경기과학기술진흥원.
  6. 차상롱 (2003). 일본의 청단기술신업지역 관련정책 및 제도적 흐름에 관한 고찰. 대한국토.도시계획학회 추계학술대회 논문집, pp.859-868
  7. 차상룡 (2004), 일본의 산업클러스터 개념과 정책동향, 국토논단, 2004년 9월호(통권 275호), 2004.9, pp.104-120
  8. Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A. and Maskell, P. (2004) "Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation", Progress in Human Geography, February, 28(1), pp.31-56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
  9. Carsten Orts Hansen and Henrik Sornn-Friese (2015), "The Blue Denmark- Is It A Maritime Labor Mobility Cluster?", Paper presented at IAME Conference 2015.
  10. Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation : The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  11. Chung, S. (2002), "Building a National Innovation System through Regional Innovation Systems", Technovation, 22(8), pp.485-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00035-9
  12. Cook et al. (1997), "Regional Innovation Systems : International and Organizational Dimension", Research Policy, Vol.25.
  13. Laugen,P.W.(2002), "Clustering and performance; the case of maritime clustering in The Netherlands", Maritime Policy & Management, Volume37(4).
  14. Niko Wijnolst et al(2003), "European Maritime Clusters Global Trend: Theoretical Framework, The Cases of Norway and the Netherlands, Policy Recommendations", Delft University Press,
  15. OECD (1997), National Innovation System, OECD, Paris.
  16. OECD (1999), Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach.
  17. OECD (2000), Science, Technology and Industry Outlook.
  18. OECD (2001), Innovative Clusters : Driver's of National Innovation Systems.
  19. Shinohara, M.(2010), "Maritime Cluster of Japan: Implications for the cluster formation policies", Maritime Policy & Management Vol.37, No.4, pp.377-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.486648
  20. SRI International (1999), Clustering as a Tool for Regional Economic Competitiveness.
  21. Porter. M. E. (1998), "Clusters and the new economic of competition", Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp.77-90.
  22. Porter. M. E. (2001), From Economic Development Theory to Action: The Process of Cluster Upgrading.
  23. Porter, M (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review, 68(2), pp.73-93
  24. Ron Jonston (2006), Scenario Planning, Strategic Foresight in Modern Management, Foresight Course, PREST, University of Manchester, 2006.
  25. Wolfgang, G. (2004), "Regional Innovation Systems and Sustainability-Selected Example of International Discussion", Technovation, 24(9), pp.749-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00152-9
  26. Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (2005), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Chichester and New York: John Wiely & Sons.
  27. 韓鐘吉(2006), 海事クラスター再構\築の必要性, 海洋政策研究財団 海事クラスターに相応しい海事専門教育に関する調査研究報告書
  28. 加藤和暢(2002). 産業クラスター論議のかんどころ, 産業立地, 2002年 12月号,
  29. 国土交通省海事局(2002), マリタイムジャパンに関する調査報告書
  30. 小林英夫 (2003). 産業空洞化の克服. 中央公諭新社
  31. 石倉洋子, 藤田昌久, 前田昇, 金井ᅳ頼, 山崎朗(2003). 日本の産業クラスター戦略ー地域における競争優位の確率, 有斐閣, pp.43-73
  32. 石川英樹 (2003), アジアにおける比較優位構造の変化と空洞化問題, 日本評論社. pp.55-77
  33. 山崎朗(2002). クラスター戦略, 有斐閣.
  34. 藤田昌久(2003),空間経済学の視点から見た産業クラスター政策の意義と課題, 石倉ほか 日本の産業クラスター戦略, 有斐閣, pp.211-261
  35. 上野, 本図, 松田(2015), 海事クラスターの歴史分析, 海事交通研究, 第64集, pp.33-42