Asian Spine Journal

Korean Society of Spine Surgery (대한척추외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Trends and Costs of External Electrical Bone Stimulators and Grafting Materials in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

  • D'Oro, Anthony (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California) ;
  • Buser, Zorica (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California) ;
  • Brodke, Darrel Scott (Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jong-Beom (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uijongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Yoon, Sangwook Tim (Department of Orthopedics, Emory Spine Center) ;
  • Youssef, Jim Aimen (Spine Colorado) ;
  • Meisel, Hans-Joerg (Department of Neurosurgery, Bergmannstrost Hospital) ;
  • Radcliff, Kristen Emmanuel (Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University) ;
  • Hsieh, Patrick (Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California) ;
  • Wang, Jeffrey Chun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California)
  • Received : 2018.03.12
  • Accepted : 2018.04.20
  • Published : 2018.12.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review. Purpose: To identify the trends in stimulator use, pair those trends with various grafting materials, and determine the influence of stimulators on the risk of revision surgery. Overview of Literature: A large number of studies has reported beneficial effects of electromagnetic energy in healing long bone fractures. However, there are few clinical studies regarding the use of electrical stimulators in spinal fusion. Methods: We used insurance billing codes to identify patients with lumbar disc degeneration who underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Comparisons between patients who did and did not receive electrical stimulators following surgery were performed using logistic regression analysis, chi-square test, and odds ratio (OR) analysis. Results: Approximately 19% of the patients (495/2,613) received external stimulators following ALIF surgery. There was a slight increase in stimulator use from 2008 to 2014 (multi-level $R^2=0.08$, single-level $R^2=0.05$). Patients who underwent multi-level procedures were more likely to receive stimulators than patients who underwent single-level procedures (p<0.05; OR, 3.72; 95% confidence interval, 3.02-4.57). Grafting options associated with most frequent stimulator use were bone marrow aspirates (BMA) plus autograft or allograft for single-level and allograft alone for multi-level procedures. In both cohorts, patients treated with bone morphogenetic proteins were least likely to receive electrical stimulators (p<0.05). Patients who received stimulation generally had higher reimbursements. Concurrent posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) (ALIF+PLF) increased the likelihood of receiving stimulators (p<0.05). Patients who received electrical stimulators had similar revision rates as those who did not receive stimulation (p>0.05), except those in the multilevel ALIF+PLF cohort, wherein the patients who underwent stimulation had higher rates of revision surgery. Conclusions: Concurrent PLF or multi-level procedures increased patients' likelihood of receiving stimulators, however, the presence of comorbidities did not. Patients who received BMA plus autograft or allograft were more likely to receive stimulation. Patients with and without bone stimulators had similar rates of revision surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Deyo RA. Fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease: still more questions than answers. Spine J 2015;15:272-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.11.004
  2. Rajaee SS, Bae HW, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:67-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb
  3. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Howard J. Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes. Spine J 2008;8:747-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.013
  4. Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Burkus JK, Pryor PW, Hardacker JW, Carreon LY. Two-year fusion and clinical outcomes in 224 patients treated with a single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion with iliac crest bone graft. Spine J 2009;9:880-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.013
  5. Kaiser MG, Eck JC, Groff MW, et al. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: part 17: bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2014;21:133-9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326
  6. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:1295-304. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00913
  7. Dwyer AF, Wickham GG. Direct current stimulation in spinal fusion. Med J Aust 1974;1:73-5. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1974.tb50762.x
  8. Kane WJ. Direct current electrical bone growth stimulation for spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:363-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198803000-00026
  9. Kahanovitz N, Arnoczky SP, Nemzek J, Shores A. The effect of electromagnetic pulsing on posterior lumbar spinal fusions in dogs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:705-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199403001-00010
  10. Oishi M, Onesti ST. Electrical bone graft stimulation for spinal fusion: a review. Neurosurgery 2000;47:1041-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200011000-00005
  11. Mooney V. A randomized double-blind prospective study of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic fields for interbody lumbar fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:708-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199007000-00016
  12. Simons JW, Hayes MA, Cristensen KD. The effect of postoperative pulsing on lumbar fusion: an open trial study. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the North American Spine Society; 1989 Jun 29-Jul 2; Quebec, Canada. Rosemont (IL): North American Spine Society; 1989.
  13. Gan JC, Glazer PA. Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1301-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0087-y
  14. Andersen T, Christensen FB, Ernst C, et al. The effect of electrical stimulation on lumbar spinal fusion in older patients: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial: part 1: functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:2241-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b02988
  15. Johnson RG. Bone marrow concentrate with allograft equivalent to autograft in lumbar fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:695-700. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000254
  16. Kucharzyk DW. A controlled prospective outcome study of implantable electrical stimulation with spinal instrumentation in a high-risk spinal fusion population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:465-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199903010-00012
  17. Meril AJ. Direct current stimulation of allograft in anterior and posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2393-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199411000-00004
  18. Ebara S, Nakayama K. Mechanism for the action of bone morphogenetic proteins and regulation of their activity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27(16 Suppl 1):S10-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200208151-00004
  19. Flynn JM. Fracture repair and bone grafting. In: Flynn JM, editor. OKU 10: orthopaedic knowledge update. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2011. p. 11-21.
  20. Roberts TT, Rosenbaum AJ. Bone grafts, bone substitutes and orthobiologics: the bridge between basic science and clinical advancements in fracture healing. Organogenesis 2012;8:114-24. https://doi.org/10.4161/org.23306
  21. Rogozinski A, Rogozinski C, Cloud G. Accelerating autograft maturation in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusions without donor site morbidity. Orthopedics 2009;32:809.