DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Treatment Using the SpyGlass Digital System in a Patient with Hepatolithiasis after a Whipple Procedure

  • Harima, Hirofumi (Department of Gastroenterology, Ube Industries Central Hospital) ;
  • Hamabe, Kouichi (Department of Gastroenterology, Ube Industries Central Hospital) ;
  • Hisano, Fusako (Department of Gastroenterology, Ube Industries Central Hospital) ;
  • Matsuzaki, Yuko (Department of Gastroenterology, Ube Industries Central Hospital) ;
  • Itoh, Tadahiko (Department of Cancer Screening, Ube Industries Central Hospital) ;
  • Sanuki, Kazutoshi (Department of Gastroenterology, Ube Industries Central Hospital) ;
  • Sakaida, Isao (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.03.14
  • Accepted : 2018.04.13
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

An 89-year-old man was referred to our hospital for treatment of hepatolithiasis causing recurrent cholangitis. He had undergone a prior Whipple procedure. Computed tomography demonstrated left-sided hepatolithiasis. First, we conducted peroral direct cholangioscopy (PDCS) using an ultraslim endoscope. Although PDCS was successfully conducted, it was unsuccessful in removing all the stones. The stones located in the B2 segment were difficult to remove because the endoscope could not be inserted deeply into this segment due to the small size of the intrahepatic bile duct. Next, we substituted the endoscope with an upper gastrointestinal endoscope. After positioning the endoscope, the SpyGlass digital system (SPY-DS) was successfully inserted deep into the B2 segment. Upon visualizing the residual stones, we conducted SPY-DS-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy. The stones were disintegrated and completely removed. In cases of PDCS failure, a treatment strategy using the SPY-DS can be considered for patients with hepatolithiasis after a Whipple procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Cheon YK, Cho YD, Moon JH, Lee JS, Shim CS. Evaluation of long-term results and recurrent factors after operative and nonoperative treatment for hepatolithiasis. Surgery 2009;146:843-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.009
  2. Okugawa T, Tsuyuguchi T, K C S, et al. Peroral cholangioscopic treatment of hepatolithiasis: long-term results. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:366-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70040-0
  3. Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic peroral direct cholangioscopy in patients with altered GI anatomy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:441-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.038
  4. Matsumoto K, Tsutsumi K, Kato H, et al. Effectiveness of peroral direct cholangioscopy using an ultraslim endoscope for the treatment of hepatolithiasis in patients with hepaticojejunostomy (with video). Surg Endosc 2016;30:1249-1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4323-6
  5. Ghersi S, Fuccio L, Bassi M, Fabbri C, Cennamo V. Current status of peroral cholangioscopy in biliary tract diseases. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015;7:510-517. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.510
  6. Xu MM, Kahaleh M. Recent developments in choledochoscopy: technical and clinical advances. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2016;9:119-124.
  7. Parsi MA. Peroral cholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:1-6. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.1
  8. Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:832-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.025
  9. Franzini TA, Moura RN, de Moura EG. Advances in therapeutic cholangioscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016;2016:5249152.
  10. Ogura T, Imanishi M, Kurisu Y, et al. Prospective evaluation of digital single-operator cholangioscope for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (with videos). Dig Endosc 2017;29:782-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12878
  11. Shimatani M, Matsushita M, Takaoka M, et al. Effective "short" double-balloon enteroscope for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy: a large case series. Endoscopy 2009;41:849-854. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1215108
  12. Iwai T, Kida M, Yamauchi H, Imaizumi H, Koizumi W. Short-type and conventional single-balloon enteroscopes for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: single-center experience. Dig Endosc 2014;26 Suppl 2:156-163.
  13. Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:165-173. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i2.165
  14. Kamiyama R, Ogura T, Okuda A, et al. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy for difficult bile duct stones under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and peroral transluminal cholangioscopy guidance. Gut Liver 2018 Feb 8 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17352.
  15. Iwashita T, Doi S, Yasuda I. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a review. Clin J Gastroenterol 2014;7:94-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-014-0467-5