Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제51권6호
  • /
  • Pages.552-557
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robotics for Advanced Therapeutic Colonoscopy

  • Wong, Jennie YY (Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore) ;
  • Ho, Khek Yu (Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.31
  • 심사 : 2018.07.07
  • 발행 : 2018.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Although colonoscopy was originally a diagnostic imaging procedure, it has now expanded to include an increasing range of therapeutic interventions. These procedures require precise maneuvers of instruments, execution of force, efficient transmission of force from the operator to the point of application, and sufficient dexterity in the mobilization of endoscopic surgical instruments. The conventional endoscope is not designed to support technically demanding endoscopic procedures. In case of colonoscopy, the tortuous anatomy of the colon makes inserting, moving, and orientating the endoscope difficult. Exerting excessive pressure can cause looping of the endoscope, pain to the patient, and even perforation of the colon. To mitigate the technical constraints, numerous technically enhanced systems have been developed to enable better control of instruments and precise delivery of force in the execution of surgical tasks such as apposing, grasping, traction, counter-traction, and cutting of tissues. Among the recent developments are highly dexterous robotic master and slave systems, computer-assisted or robotically enhanced conventional endoscopes, and autonomously driven locomotion devices that can effortlessly traverse the colon. Developments in endoscopic instrumentations have overcome technical barriers and opened new horizons for further advancements in therapeutic interventions. This review describes examples of some of these systems in the context of their applications to advanced therapeutic colonoscopy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ASGE Training Committee, Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, et al. ASGE's assessment of competency in endoscopy evaluation tools for colonoscopy and EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.003
  2. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:678-683; quiz 645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2007.01.006
  3. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010;24:343-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0562-8
  4. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032
  5. Yoon JY, Kim JH, Lee JY, et al. Clinical outcomes for patients with perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection of laterally spreading tumors of the colorectum. Surg Endosc 2013;27:487-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2462-6
  6. Phee SJ, Low SC, Huynh VA, Kencana AP, Sun ZL, Yang K. Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009;2009:1192-1195.
  7. Wang Z, Phee SJ, Lomanto D, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot: an animal survival study. Endoscopy 2012;44:690-694. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1309404
  8. Ho KY, Phee SJ, Shabbir A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric lesions by using a master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:593-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.009
  9. Phee SJ, Reddy N, Chiu PW, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection is effective in treating patients with early-stage gastric neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:1117-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.019
  10. Phee SJ, Ho KY, Lomanto D, et al. Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER). Surg Endosc 2010;24:2293-2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0955-8
  11. Chiu PW, Phee SJ, Wang Z, et al. Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by Overstitch: a preclinical study. Surg Endosc 2014;28:319-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3149-3
  12. Diana M, Chung H, Liu KH, et al. Endoluminal surgical triangulation: overcoming challenges of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissections using a novel flexible endoscopic surgical platform: feasibility study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2013;27:4130-4135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3049-6
  13. Suzuki N, Hattori A, Tanoue K, et al. Scorpion shaped endoscopic surgical robot for NOTES and SPS with augmented reality functions. In: Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality - 5th International Workshop, MIAR 2010; 2010 Sep 19-20; Beijing, China. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. p. 541-550.
  14. Rothstein RI, Ailinger RA, Peine W. Computer-assisted endoscopic robot system for advanced therapeutic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:P113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02369-1
  15. Franzino RJ. The Laprotek surgical system and the next generation of robotics. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1317-1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00171-3
  16. Woo J, Choi JH, Seo JT, Kim TI, Yi BJ. Development of a robotic colonoscopic manipulation system, using haptic feedback algorithm. Yonsei Med J 2017;58:139-143. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.139
  17. Kwok KW, Tsoi KH, Vitiello V, et al. Dimensionality reduction in controlling articulated snake robot for endoscopy under dynamic active constraints. IEEE Trans Robot 2013;29:15-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2012.2226382
  18. Patel N, Seneci CA, Shang J, et al. Evaluation of a novel flexible snake robot for endoluminal surgery. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3349-3355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4088-y
  19. Warren A, Mountney P, Noonan D, Yang GZ. Horizon stabilized--dynamic view expansion for robotic assisted surgery (HS-DVE). Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2012;7:281-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0603-3
  20. Atallah S. Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): could this be the solution we have been searching for? Tech Coloproctol 2017;21:809-814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1697-6
  21. Eickhoff A, van Dam J, Jakobs R, et al. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study"). Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:261-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.01002.x
  22. Bianchi F, Ciuti G, Koulaouzidis A, et al. An innovative robotic platform for magnetically-driven painless colonoscopy. Ann Transl Med 2017;5:421. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.09.15
  23. Tumino E, Sacco R, Bertini M, Bertoni M, Parisi G, Capria A. Endotics system vs colonoscopy for the detection of polyps. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:5452-5456. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i43.5452
  24. Gluck N, Fishman S, Melhem A, Goldfarb S, Halpern Z, Santo E. A novel colonoscope with panoramic visualization detected more simulated polyps than conventional colonoscopy in a live swine model. Endosc Int Open 2015;3:E642-E645. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1393080
  25. Gluck N, Melhem A, Halpern Z, Mergener K, Santo E. A novel self-propelled disposable colonoscope is effective for colonoscopy in humans (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016;83:998-1004.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.083
  26. Iwasa T, Nakadate R, Onogi S, et al. A new robotic-assisted flexible endoscope with single-hand control: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the ex vivo porcine stomach. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3386-3392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6188-y
  27. Rosch T, Adler A, Pohl H, et al. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:1139-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.065
  28. Huberty V, Ibrahim M, Hiernaux M, Chau A, Dugardeyn S, Deviere J. Safety and feasibility of an endoluminal-suturing device for endoscopic gastric reduction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:833-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.007
  29. van der Stap N, Rozeboom ED, Pullens HJ, van der Heijden F, Broeders IA. Feasibility of automated target centralization in colonoscopy. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016;11:457-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1301-3
  30. Pullens HJ, van der Stap N, Rozeboom ED, et al. Colonoscopy with robotic steering and automated lumen centralization: a feasibility study in a colon model. Endoscopy 2016;48:286-290. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-114428

피인용 문헌

  1. Endoscopic robotic suturing: The way forward vol.25, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_12_19
  2. Robotics In Vivo: A Perspective on Human-Robot Interaction in Surgical Robotics vol.3, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-091219-013437
  3. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Large Pseudo-Polyps in the Right Colon Using a Novel Articulating Grasper With a Double-Balloon Endolumenal Surgical Platform: An Ex Vivo Study in a Porcine Colorec vol.64, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000001898
  4. Editors' Choice of Noteworthy Clinical Endoscopy Publications in the First Decade vol.54, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.216
  5. Robotics in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy vol.11, pp.23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311351