DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness Measurements Obtained Using an Ocular Surface Interferometer in Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Patients

  • Lee, Sang Min (Department of Ophthalmology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University) ;
  • Chung, Sok Joong (Department of Ophthalmology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University) ;
  • Lew, Helen (Department of Ophthalmology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University)
  • Received : 2018.01.22
  • Accepted : 2018.03.16
  • Published : 2018.12.05

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT) between patients with incomplete nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) and normal controls and to analyze the changes in tear film LLT and blinking pattern after silicone tube intubation in NLDO patients. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 68 eyes in 52 incomplete NLDO patients who underwent silicone tube intubation from January 2017 to July 2017. The LLT, blinking pattern, and Meibomian gland image were measured with the LipiView II ocular surface interferometer. The Meibomian gland drop-out ratio was measured using the polygon selection tool in the Image J program. Tear meniscus height, which is the other lacrimal indicator, was assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results: Tear meniscus height was significantly decreased after silicone tube intubation (p < 0.01). Preoperative minimum, maximum, and average LLT values were $62.4{\pm}24.0$, $86.7{\pm}17.9$, and $71.7{\pm}23.3nm$, respectively. Significant changes in the minimum, maximum, and average LLT ($74.8{\pm}23.6$, $98.8{\pm}11.0$, and $91.6{\pm}16.1nm$, respectively) were observed after silicone tube intubation (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001). The partial blinking/total blinking ratio in 20 seconds and the Meibomian gland drop-out ratio showed no significant change after silicone tube intubation. Conclusions: Overall, the LLT was increased after silicone tube intubation. Silicone tube intubation may be helpful in maintaining LLT with a normalized of amount of tears.

Keywords

References

  1. Mishima S, Maurice DM. The oily layer of the tear film and evaporation from the corneal surface. Exp Eye Res 1961;1:39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4835(61)80006-7
  2. Rosenfeld L, Fuller GG. Consequences of interfacial viscoelasticity on thin film stability. Langmuir 2012;28:14238-44. https://doi.org/10.1021/la302731z
  3. Goto E, Tseng SC. Differentiation of lipid tear deficiency dry eye by kinetic analysis of tear interference images. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:173-80. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.2.173
  4. Yokoi N, Yamada H, Mizukusa Y, et al. Rheology of tear film lipid layer spread in normal and aqueous tear-deficient dry eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:5319-24. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1407
  5. Tomlinson A, Doane MG, McFadyen A. Inputs and outputs of the lacrimal system: review of production and evaporative loss. Ocul Surf 2009;7:186-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(12)70186-6
  6. Bron AJ, Tiffany JM, Gouveia SM, et al. Functional aspects of the tear film lipid layer. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:347-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.019
  7. Lee JK, Kim TH. Changes in cytokines in tears after endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Eye (Lond) 2014;28:600-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.33
  8. Lew H, Yun YS, Lee SY. Electrolytes and electrophoretic studies of tear proteins in tears of patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmologica 2005;219:142-6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000085246
  9. Kubo M, Sakuraba T, Arai Y, Nakazawa M. Tear lipid layer interference changes after dacryocystorhinostomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:653-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-5155(01)00417-8
  10. Munk PL, L in DT, Morris D C. E piphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 1990;177:687-90. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.3.2243969
  11. Sung Y, Park JS, Lew H. Measurement of lacrimal punctum using spectralis domain anterior optical coherence tomography. Acta Ophthalmol 2017;95:e619-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13322
  12. Eom Y, Lee JS, Kang SY, et al. Correlation between quantitative measurements of tear film lipid layer thickness and meibomian gland loss in patients with obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction and normal controls. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:1104-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.01.008
  13. Finis D, Pischel N, Schrader S, Geerling G. Evaluation of lipid layer thickness measurement of the tear film as a diagnostic tool for Meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea 2013;32:1549-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a7f3e1
  14. Arita R, Fukuoka S, Morishige N. new insights into the lipid layer of the tear film and meibomian glands. Eye Contact Lens 2017;43:335-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000369
  15. Yokoi N, Takehisa Y, Kinoshita S. Correlation of tear lipid layer interference patterns with the diagnosis and severity of dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:818-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70378-2

Cited by

  1. Tear film imager for dynamic mapping of the human tear film vol.58, pp.29, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.58.007987
  2. Alteration of Tear Cytokine Expressions in Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction - Potential Insights into the Etiopathogenesis vol.45, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1665186
  3. Ocular surface analysis: A comparison between the LipiView® II and IDRA® vol.31, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120969035