Correlation Analysis of the Lumbar Spine and Femur Neck BMD using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Rehabilitated Patients

재활치료 환자에서 DXA를 이용한 요추부와 대퇴경부 골밀도 검사의 상관관계

  • Jung, Myo-Young (Department of Radiology, Chosun University Honam Regional Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Ji, Yun-Sang (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Bok (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Dong, Kyung-Rae (Department of Radiological Technology, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Kwang (Depatment of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Ji-Won (Department of Radiological Science, Jeonju University)
  • 정묘영 (조선대학교 호남권역 재활병원) ;
  • 지연상 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 김창복 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 동경래 (광주보건대학교 방사선과) ;
  • 류재광 (서울아산병원 핵의학과) ;
  • 최지원 (전주대학교 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2018.09.19
  • Accepted : 2018.11.19
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Average life expectancy is getting longer due to medical developments and improvements in living standards. So much so that the elderly have an increased risk of developing osteoporosis. Therefore, it is important to prevent, diagnose, and treat the senile disease at an early stage through a bone density test. Bone density is measured by dual energy X-ray absorption (DXA). In this study, while using DXA, in cases when the measurements for both the lumbar and the femur could not be taken simultaneously, the correlation between both measurements were known, and the measurement of one area was used to make a clinical inference for the value of the other. Measurements were taken using Lunar Prodigy Advance (GE) for 43 participant with clinically significant fractures. Statistical calculations were produced and analysed regarding bone density. In case of T-score, lumbar spine produced a statistical result of $-2.112{\pm}1.836$ and femur neck was $-1.716{\pm}1.565$. In case of Z-score lumbar spine produced a statistical result of $-0.151{\pm}1.513$, and femur neck $-0.026{\pm}1.283$. It is indicated that the pearson correlation coefficient of T-score between lumbar spine and femur neck is high at 0.699, and the pearson correlation coefficient of Z-score is considered relatively high at 0.503. The correlation of bone density between lumbar spine and femur neck is shown to be statistically meaningful in T-score's p-value at 0.000 and Z-score's p-value at 0.001. In conclusion, it seems to have clinical usefulness that we can infer the result of one measurement through that of the other part tested, based on the knowledge of the correlation coefficients between lumbar spine and femur neck.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Gwangju Health University

References

  1. 정책연구원. 2015. 여성이 남성보다 13.4배 많은 골다공증, 봄철 산행시 낙상사고 주의하고, 생활습관 개선 및 운동으로 예방해야. 건강보험관리공단.
  2. Blake GM and Fogelman I. 2001. Bone densitometry and the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Semin Nucl Med. 31(1):69-81. https://doi.org/10.1053/snuc.2001.18749
  3. Dong KR, Kim HS and Chung WK. 2008. A Study of Equipment Accuracy and Test Precision in Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 31(1):17-23.
  4. Fiter J, Nolla JM, Gomez-Vaquero C, Martinez-Aguila D, Valverde J and Roig-Escofet D. 2001. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 12(7):565-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170078
  5. Han MS and Cho DH. 2012. The Correlation Analysis of BMD in Proximal Femur and Spine with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. J. Korea Soc. Comput. Inf. 17(9):165-169. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci/2012.17.9.165
  6. Jang JS, Yang SO, Kim DH, Jo YS, Lee SH and Kim KY. 1996. Comparative Study of Femur BMD and Lumbar BMD Measurement Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Proximal Femur Fractures. Korean J. Bone metab. 3(1):170-173.
  7. Kendler DL, Kiebzak GM, Ambrose CG, Dinu C, Robertson S, Schmeer P and Van Pelt JL. 2006. Effect of calcium tablets on interpretation of lumbar spine DXA scans. J. Clin. Densitom. 9(1):97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2005.12.002
  8. Kim EH, Kim HS, Dong KR, Park YS, Chung WK and Cho JH. 2012. A Study on the Effects of a Calcium Drug on the Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by Using Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). J. Korean Phys. Soc. 61(11):1889-1897. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.61.1889
  9. Kim EH, Shim DO, Dong KR, Kim HS, Kweon DC, Goo EH and Chung WK. 2010. Assessment of the Effect of Bone Density and Soft Tissue Thickness on Phantom Measurements. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 57(5):1263-1269. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.57.1263
  10. Kim HS and Dong KR. 2009. Increasing Work Efficiency with Prevention of Reinspection for Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Exams. J. Korea Cont. Assoc. 9(5):174-181. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2009.9.5.174
  11. Kim HS, Dong KR and Kim CB. 2009. Reduction of the Useless Radiation Exposure to Patients and Improvement of the Skill to Manage the Test according to Minimizing Changes of Posture in Bone Mineral Density. J. Korea Cont. Assoc. 9(4):228-235. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2009.9.4.228
  12. Kim HS, Dong KR and Ryu YH. 2009. Accurate Quality Control Method of Bone Mineral Density Measurement (Focus on Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry). J. Radiol. Sci. Technol. 32(4):361-370.
  13. Yang JY and Kim YM. 1996. Correlation analysis of BMD in proximal femur and spine. J Korean Soc. Fract. 16(3):440-446.
  14. Yoo MC, Han JS, Kim IW and Lee HK. 1993. Bone mineral density and fracture threshold in the patients with femoral neck & intertrochanteric fractures due to osteoporosis. J Orthop. Assoc. 28(5):1851-1965. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.1993.28.5.1851