DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

취약계층 아동의 배달도시락에 대한 중요도-만족도 분석

Importance and Satisfaction Analysis of Delivery Lunchboxes for Children from Low-Income Families in Korea

  • 권수연 (신구대학교 식품영양과) ;
  • 한규상 (호남대학교 식품영양학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.17
  • 심사 : 2018.09.14
  • 발행 : 2018.10.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the quality attributes and importance that affects their satisfaction with respect to lunchboxes amongst children from low-income families in Korea. In case of $1-3^{rd}$-grade elementary school, 57.1% received lunch box through the community child center, while 45.2%, 68.5% and 80.7% of $4-6^{th}$-elementary school, middle school, and high school students received the lunch box from home, respectively. Typically, in 40.2% of all grades, the time to eat the meal was within 1~2 hours of delivery, and 34.0% consumed the lunch within 2~6 hours of delivery. With respect to intake of the contents of lunchboxes, 72.0% of the participants answered that they ate 80% of the lunchboxes delivered and 24.9% only ate 50% of the content of lunchboxes. The largest leftover were vegetables (26.9%), and the reason for leaving food was 'do not like to eat (36.1%)' followed by 'no taste (32.6%)'. Regarding improvements in delivery lunchboxes, elementary school students selected 'taste', while middle school and high school students selected 'variety of menu'. The 'nutrition (3.69 point)' of the lunchboxes was the highest satisfaction and the 'variety of menu (3.34 point)' was the lowest. In all grades, 'nutrition' and 'hygiene' were considered to be important as quality attributes of the delivery lunchboxes, and satisfaction was also high. On the other hand, in the $1-3^{rd}$-grade elementary school, 'variety of menu' and 'amount of side dish' were important but satisfaction was low. The $4-6^{th}$-grade elementary school, middle school and high school students stated that 'taste' and 'variety of menu' were important, but satisfaction was low.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang CJ, Park EM. 2006. A study on state and effective factors on the satisfaction degree of the meal service among low income children and youth. J Korean Counc Child Right 10:771-793
  2. Cho AJ. 2008. The food delivery services of community child centers for poor children. Health-Welf Policy Forum 139:43-54
  3. Han G, Kwon S. 2016. Intakes an satisfaction of home-delivered meal box for children from low-income families in Chungcheongbuk- do, Korea. Korean J Food Nutr 29:716-723 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2016.29.5.716
  4. Hong SH, Han KS. 2002. The menu preference of middle school students in contracted management middle school foodservice. J Korean Soc Food Cult 17:1-15
  5. Jang MS, Jang EE. 2010. Assessment of child meals and study on the delivery system in Seoul. pp.3-240. Research Report. Seoul Foundation of Women & Family
  6. Kim MH, Yoon SY, Kim MW. 2013. Survey on the eating habit and food preference of lower and higher grade elementary school students - Based on Daejeon area -. Korean J Food Nutr 26:952-966 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2013.26.4.952
  7. Kim MS, Kim HR, Jo AJ, Lee HW, Hong M, Kim HJ. 2007. Status on Food Service Support Systems for Low-Income Children. p.110. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
  8. Kim SH, Cha MH, Kim YK. 2006a. High school students' preferences and food intake on menu items offered by school foodservice in Daegu. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 35:945-954 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2006.35.7.945
  9. Kim SY, Min SO, Lee MW, Ryu SA. 2006b. Combination preferences of side dishes and one-dish items to develop set menus for school foodservice. Korean J Nutr 39:307-315
  10. Korea Food & Drug. 2009. Sanitation Management Manual for Foodservice Institution. pp.38-39
  11. Lee SM. 2001. Survey on Support Opinion with Family State of Low-Income Children. Holt Children's Service Inc
  12. Lee SM. 2015. Survey and Improvement on Government Funded Meal Support Program for Low-Income Children of Seoul. pp.3-240. Seoul Foundation of Women & Family
  13. Ministry for Health and Welfare 2017. Status of Children's Support Meal
  14. Ministry of Food & Drug Safety 2009. Sanitation Management Manual for Foodservice Institution. pp.38-39
  15. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2018. Guideline for Children's Business in 2018[II]. pp.131-151. Sejong
  16. Moon JA, Yoo HC, Lee KE. 2013. Microbiological assessment of home-delivered meals for children from low-income families during production and delivery. J Korean Diet Assoc 19:236-252 https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2013.19.3.236
  17. Moon JA, Yoo HC, Lee KE. 2015. Use and assesment of home-delivered meal service for children from low-income families. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 44:935-943 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.6.935
  18. Yoon B, Yoon J, Shim JE, Kwon S. 2009. Current status of meal box service management for children from low-income families during summer vacation. Korean J Community Nutr 14:206-215
  19. Yoon BR, Kwon SY, Yoon JH. 2011. Menu evaluation of meal boxes delivered to children from low-income families during summer vacation. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 21:118-124
  20. Yoon JH. 2008. Status on 'Happy Meal Box' foodservice for low-income children. Research Report. The Happiness Foundation