Perspectives in Nursing Science

  • 제15권2호
  • /
  • Pages.49-69
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2288-2898(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7687(eISSN)
서울대학교 간호과학연구소 (The Research Institute of Nursing Science Seoul National University)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Service Quality beyond Access: A Multilevel Analysis of Neonatal, Infant, and Under-Five Child Mortality Using the Indian Demographic and Health Survey 2015~2016

  • Kim, Rockli (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health) ;
  • Choi, Narshil (Seoul National University College of Medicine, JW LEE Center for Global Medicine of Seoul National University) ;
  • Subramanian, S.V. (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health) ;
  • Oh, Juhwan (International Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, JW LEE Center for Global Medicine of Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.24
  • 심사 : 2018.09.27
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to derive contextual indicators of medical provider quality and assess their relative importance along with the individual utilization of antenatal care (ANC) and institutional births with a skilled birth attendant (SBA) in India using a multilevel framework. Methods: The 2015~2016 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) from India was used to assess the outcomes of neonatal, infant, and under-five child mortality. The final analytic sample included 182,980 children across 28,283 communities, 640 districts, and 36 states and union territories. The contextual indicators of medical provider quality for districts and states were derived from the individual-level number of ANC visits (<4 or ${\geq}4$) and institutional delivery with SBA. A series of random effects logistic regression models were estimated with a stepwise addition of predictor variables. Results: About half of the mothers (47.3%) had attended ${\geq}4$ ANC visits and 75.8% delivered in institutional settings with SBAs. Based on ANC visits, 276~281 districts (43.1~43.9%) and 13~16 states (36.5~44.4%) were classified as "low" quality areas, whereas 268~285 districts (41.9~44.5%) and 8~9 states (22.2~25.0%) were classified as "low" quality areas based on institutional delivery with SBAs. Conditional on a comprehensive set of covariates, the individual use of both ANC and SBA were significantly associated with all mortality outcomes (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.26, and OR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.19, respectively, for under-five child mortality) and remained robust even after adjusting for contextual indicators of medical provider quality. Districts and states with low quality were associated with 57~61% and 27~43% higher odds of under-five child mortality, respectively. Conclusion: When simultaneously considered, district- and state-level provider quality mattered more than individual access to care for all mortality outcomes in India. Further investigations are needed to assess the importance of improving the quality of health service delivery at higher levels to prevent unnecessary child deaths in developing countries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. United Nations Children's Fund. Committing to child survival: a promise renewed. New York: United Nations Children's Fund; 2015 Sep. 96 p. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/APR_2015_9_Sep_15.pdf
  2. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME). 'Levels and trends in child mortality: Report 2017, Estimates developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation', New York: United Nations Children's Fund; 2017 Oct. 36 p. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Child_Mortality_Report_2017.pdf
  3. Dutta AK, Aggarwal A. Newer development in immunization practices. Indian J Pediatr. 2018 Jan;85(1):44-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-017-2530-y
  4. National Health Mission, Government of India. About NHM [Internet]. [place unknown]: National Health Mission, Government of India; c2014 [cited 2018 Jun 15]. Available from: http://nhm.gov.in/nhm/about-nhm.html
  5. Sidney K, Diwan V, El-Khatib Z, de Costa A. India's JSY cash transfer program for maternal health: Who participates and who doesn't-a report from Ujjain district. Reprod Health. 2012 Jan 24;9:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-2
  6. Lim SS, Dandona L, Hoisington JA, James SL, Hogan MC, Gakidou E. India's Janani Suraksha Yojana, a conditional cash transfer programme to increase births in health facilities: an impact evaluation. Lancet. 2010 Jun 5;375(9730):2009-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60744-1
  7. Barros AJ, Victora CG. Measuring coverage in MNCH: determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001390. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390
  8. Corsi DJ, Subramanian SV. Association between coverage of maternal and child health interventions, and under-5 mortality: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of 35 sub-Saharan African countries. Glob Health Action. 2014 Sep 3;7:24765. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24765
  9. Kruk ME, Freedman LP. Assessing health system performance in developing countries: a review of the literature. Health Policy. 2008 Mar;85(3):263-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.09.003
  10. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2016. 152 p. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250796/9789241549912-eng.pdf;jsessionid=85AACE248B0D56E19D87FD68711C370F?sequence=1
  11. Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja S. Opportunities for Africa's newborns: practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa. Lawn J, Kerber K, editors. [Geneva (Switzerland)]: World Health Organization; 2006. Chapter 2, Antenatal care; p. 51-62. Available from: http://www.who.int/pmnch/media/publications/oanfullreport.pdf
  12. Gupta A, Fledderjohann J, Reddy H, Raman VR, Stuckler D, Vellakkal S. Barriers and prospects of India's conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional delivery care: a qualitative analysis of the supply-side perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 25;18:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2849-8
  13. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017. 637 p. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-4Reports/India.pdf
  14. Okeke EN, Chari AV. Can institutional deliveries reduce newborn mortality? Evidence from Rwanda. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2014 Dec. 47 p. Available from: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/working_papers/WR1000/WR1072/RAND_WR1072.pdf
  15. Banerjee A, Duflo E. Addressing absence. J Econ Perspect. 2006 Win;20(1):117-32. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526139
  16. Das J, Hammer J, Leonard K. The quality of medical advice in low-income countries. J Econ Perspect. 2008 Spr;22(2):91-116. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.2.93
  17. Chaudhury N, Hammer J, Kremer M, Muralidharan K, Rogers FH. Missing in action: teacher and health worker absence in developing countries. J Econ Perspect. 2006 Win;20(1):91-116. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526058
  18. Carroli G, Rooney C, Villar J. How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15 Suppl 1:1-42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.0150s1001.x
  19. Bhutta ZA. Mapping the geography of child mortality: a key step in addressing disparities. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Dec;4(12):e877-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30264-9
  20. Singh A, Pathak PK, Chauhan RK, Pan W. Infant and child mortality in India in the last two decades: a geospatial analysis. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026856
  21. Raven JH, Tolhurst RJ, Tang S, Van Den Broek N. What is quality in maternal and neonatal health care?. Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):e676-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2011.09.003
  22. Dettrick Z, Gouda HN, Hodge A, Jimenez-Soto E. Measuring quality of maternal and newborn care in developing countries using demographic and health surveys. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0157110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157110
  23. Kozhimannil KB, Hung P, Prasad S, Casey M, McClellan M, Moscovice IS. Birth volume and the quality of obstetric care in rural hospitals. J Rural Health. 2014 Fall;30(4):335-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12061
  24. Pileggi-Castro C, Camelo Jr J, Perdona G, Mussi-Pinhata MM, Cecatti JG, Mori R, et al. Development of criteria for identifying neonatal near-miss cases: analysis of two WHO multicountry cross-sectional studies. BJOG. 2014 Mar;121 Suppl 1:110-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12637
  25. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), ICF. Fact Sheet, National Family Health Survey(NFHS-4), 2015-16. IIPS; 2017. Available from: http://rchiips.org/nfhs/factsheet_NFHS-4.shtml
  26. National Family Health Survey. NFHS-4 [Internet]. Maharashtra: International Institute for Population Sciences; c2009 [cited 2018 Jan]. Available from: http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs4.shtml
  27. Subramanian SV, Glymour MM, Kawachi I. Macrosocial determinants of population health. New York: Springer; 2007. Chapter 15, Identifying causal ecologic effects on health: a methodologic assessment; pp. 301-31.
  28. Kim R, Mohanty SK, Subramanian SV. Multilevel geographies of poverty in India. World Dev. 2016 Nov;87:349-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.001
  29. Subramanian SV, Jones K, Duncan C. Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. 4. Multilevel methods for public health research; pp. 65-111.
  30. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 4th ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. 382 p.
  31. Ejigu Tafere T, Afework MF, Yalew AW. Antenatal care service quality increases the odds of utilizing institutional delivery in Bahir Dar city administration, north western Ethiopia: a prospective follow up study. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0192428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192428
  32. Ram F, Singh A. Is antenatal care effective in improving maternal health in rural Uttar Pradesh? Evidence from a district level household survey. J Biosoc Sci. 2006 Jul;38(4):433-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932005026453
  33. Bloom SS, Lippeveld T, Wypij D. Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan. 1999 Mar;14(1):38-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/14.1.38
  34. Liu L, Li M, Yang L, Ju L, Tan B, Walker N, et al. Measuring coverage in MNCH: a validation study linking population survey derived coverage to maternal, newborn, and child health care records in rural China. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e60762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060762
  35. Stanton CK, Rawlins B, Drake M, Dos Anjos M, Cantor D, Chongo L, et al. Measuring coverage in MNCH: testing the validity of women's self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e60694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060694
  36. Suzuki E, Yamamoto E, Takao S, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV. Clarifying the use of aggregated exposures in multilevel models: self-included vs. self-excluded measures. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051717
  37. Rani M, Bonu S, Harvey S. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Feb;20(1):62-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm052
  38. Heredia-Pi I, Servan-Mori E, Darney BG, Reyes-Morales H, Lozano R. Measuring the adequacy of antenatal health care: a national cross-sectional study in Mexico. Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):452-61. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.15.168302
  39. Carvajal-Aguirre L, Amouzou A, Mehra V, Ziqi M, Zaka N, Newby H. Gap between contact and content in maternal and newborn care: An analysis of data from 20 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020501. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.07.020501
  40. Hodgins S, D'Agostino A. The quality-coverage gap in antenatal care: toward better measurement of effective coverage. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Apr 8;2(2):173-81. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00176
  41. Powell-Jackson T, Mazumdar S, Mills A. Financial incentives in health: New evidence from India's Janani Suraksha Yojana. J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;43:154-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.07.001
  42. Mohanty SK, Kim R, Khan PK, Subramanian SV. Geographic variation in household and catastrophic health spending in India: assessing the relative importance of villages, districts, and states, 2011-2012. Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):167-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12315