DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Underwater Drop Characteristics for Hazard Apparatuses on Subsea Cable Using Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis

유체-구조 연성해석 기반 해저케이블 위해인자의 수중낙하 특성 비교

  • Received : 2018.08.08
  • Accepted : 2018.10.18
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

It is known that damages to the subsea cables used for electric power transmission between islands and countries, including renewable energy from offshore wind power, current, tides, etc., cost much to restore, which causes social and economic losses. Various types of fishing rigs and anchors have been reported to be the greatest hazards to subsea cables. It is possible to design and construct a suitable protection facility for a subsea cable by precisely estimating the underwater behavior of such hazardous apparatuses. In this study, numerical simulations of the underwater behaviors of various hazardous apparatuses were carried out using fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis as a basic study to simulate the actual behavior phenomena of hazardous apparatuses in relation to a subsea cable. In addition, the underwater drop characteristics according to the types of hazardous apparatuses were compared. In order to verify the accuracy of the FSI analysis method used in this study, we compared the test results for underwater drops of a steel ball bearing. Stock anchors, stockless anchors, and rocket piles, which were actually reported to be the cases of damage to subsea cables along the southwest coast of Korea, were considered as the hazardous apparatuses for the numerical simulations. Each hazardous apparatus was generated by a Lagrangian model and coupled with the fluid domain idealized by the Eulerian equation to construct the three-dimensional FSI analysis model. The accuracy of the numerical simulation results was verified by comparing them with the analytical solutions, and the underwater drop characteristics according to the types of hazard apparatuses were compared.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S.H., Kim, D.S., 2009. Submarine Cable Installation and Protection Methods According as Characteristics of Ocean Environment. Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, 15(1), 25-32.
  2. Cho, H.M., Kim, S.H., Ryu, Y.S., Kim, J.T., 2012. Numerical Simulation of Burial Submarine Cable Protector under Anchor Collision. Proceeding of KAOSTS Joint Conference, Daegu, Korea, 1766-1770.
  3. Fox, R.W., Mcdonald, A.T., Pritchard, P.J., 2003. Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey.
  4. Halliday, D., Resnick, R., Walker, J., 2011. Principles of Physics, Wiley, New Jersey.
  5. Hasanloo, D., Pang, H., Yu, G., 2012. On the Estimation of the Falling Velocity and Drag Coefficient of Torpedo Anchor during Acceleration. Ocean Engineering, 42, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.12.022
  6. ICPC, 2009. Damage to Submarine Cables Caused by Anchors. Loss Prevention Bulletin, International Cable Protection Committee, UK.
  7. KEPCO, 2006. Diving Inspection Report for Maintenance Construction of HVDC Transmission Line Marine Area on Jeju Section. KEPCO, Korea.
  8. Kim, J.H., Yoon, J.M., Park, N.S., Kim, J.H., Song, C.Y., 2017. Estimation of Stock Anchor Drop Characteristics by Fluiddomain Modeling Parameters using Fluid-structure Interaction Analysis. Proceeding of KSOE Fall Conference, Geoje, Korea, 30-34.
  9. Kim, J.Y., 2015. A Study on Unsteady Drag Coefficient of Free Falling Structure in the Water, Ph.D. Thesis, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
  10. KS, 2013. KS V 3311: Anchors. Korean Standards Association, Korea.
  11. MSC Software, 2017. MSC.Nastran 2017 - Explicit Nonlinear (SOL700) User's Guide. California.
  12. Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M., Kim, S.H., 2015. Collision Behavior Evaluation of Flexible Concrete Mattress Depending on Material Models. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 29(1), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2015.29.1.070
  13. Ryu, Y.S., Cho, H.M., Kim, S.H., 2016. Damage Evaluation of Flexible Concrete Mattress Considering Steel Reinforcement Modeling and Collision Angle of Anchor. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 30(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2016.30.2.109
  14. Shin, Y.S., Lee, M., Lam, K.Y., Yeo, K.S., 1998. Modeling Mitigation Effects of Watershield on Shock Wave. Shock and Vibration, 5(4), 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1155/1998/782032
  15. Woo, C., Seo, M., Park, J.H., Kim, Y., Jang, J.B., 2017. Quantification of Hazard Factors for Subsea Cable Protection in Fishing Farms and Fishery Areas. Proceeding of JCDP Annual Conference, Busan, Korea, 45-46.
  16. Woo, J., 2014. Behavior Characteristic of Submarine Power Cable Protectors under Anchor Collision, Ph.D. Thesis, Korea.
  17. Woo, J., Na, W.B., 2010. Analyses of the Maximum Response of Cylinders-connected Protector under Anchor Colliding and Dragging. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 24(5), 81-87.