DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance of low and medium-rise RC buildings with wide-beam and ribbed-slab

  • Turker, Kaan (Balikesir University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Civil Engineering) ;
  • Gungor, Ilhan (Boga Engineering Company)
  • Received : 2017.09.25
  • Accepted : 2018.06.26
  • Published : 2018.10.25

Abstract

In this study, seismic performance of low and medium-rise RC buildings with wide-beam and ribbed-slab were evaluated numerically. Moment resisting systems consisting of moment and dual frame were selected as structural system of the buildings. Sufficiency of moment resisting wide-beam frames designed with high ductility requirements were evaluated. Upon necessity frames were stiffen with shear-walls. The buildings were designed in accordance with the Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC 2007) and were evaluated by using the strain-based nonlinear static method specified in TEC. Second order (P-delta) effects on the lateral load capacity of the buildings were also assessed in the study. The results indicated that the predicted seismic performances were achieved for the low-rise (4-story) building with the high ductility requirements. However, the moment resisting frame with high ductility was not adequate for the medium-rise building. Addition of sufficient amount of shear-walls to the system proved to be efficient way of providing the target performance of structure.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 318 (2008), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  2. ASCE/SEI41-13 (2013), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers Virginia, USA.
  3. Benavent-Climent, A. (2005), "Shaking table tests of reinforced concrete wide beam-column connections", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(15), 1833-1839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.507
  4. Benavent-Climent, A., Cahis, X. and Vico, J.M. (2010), "Interior wide beam-column connections in existing RC frames subjected to lateral earthquake loading", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8(2), 8(2), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9144-3
  5. Cosar, A., Kocak, A., Guney, D., Selcuk, M.E. and Yildirim, M. (2011), "23 October 2011 Van earthquake technical investigation report", Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  6. Donmez, C. (2013), "Seismic performance of wide-beam infill joist block RC frames in Turkey", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 29(1), 04014026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000485
  7. Elsouri, A.M. and Harajli, M.H. (2013), "Behavior of reinforced concrete wide concealed-beam/narrow-column joints under lateral earthquake loading", ACI Struct. J., 110(2), 205-215.
  8. Eurocode-8 (2008), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  9. Gentry, R.G. and Wight, J.K. (1994), "Wide beam-column connections under earthquake-type loading", Earthq Spectra, 10(4), 675-703. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585793
  10. Gentry, T.R. (1992), "Reinforced concrete wide beam-column connections under earthquake-type loading", Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.
  11. Goldsworthy, H.M. and Abdouka, K. (2011), "Displacement-based assessment of non ductile exterior wide band beam-column connections", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2011.597488
  12. Gulkan, P. (1998), "Turkey earthquakes June 27 1998 Ceyhan Misis earthquake reconnaissance report, METU-DMC", METUEERC, Ankara, Turkey.
  13. Gungor, I. (2014), "Numerical investigations on seismic performance of RC buildings with ribbed slab and wide beam", M.Sc. Dissertation, Institute of Science, Balikesir University, Turkey.
  14. Kulkarni, S.A. and Li, B. (2008), "Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete Interior wide-beam column joints", J. Earthq. Eng., 13(1), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802211941
  15. Lopez-Almansa, F.L., Dominguez, D. and Benavent-Climent, A. (2013), "Vulnerability analysis of RC buildings with widebeams located in moderate seismicity regions", Eng. Struct., 46, 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.033
  16. Malley, J.O., Celebi, M., Bruneau, M., Saaticioglu, M., Erdik, M. and Gulkan, P. (1993), "1992 Erzincan earthquake: Buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 9(S1), 49-85. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585751
  17. NZSA (1995), Standard for the Design of Concrete Structures (NZS3101-95), New Zealand Standards Authority, New Zealand.
  18. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992), Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA.
  19. Quintero-Febres, C.G. and Wight, J.K. (2001), "Experimental study of reinforced concrete interior wide beam-column connections subjected to lateral loading", ACI Struct. J., 98(4), 572-582.
  20. SAP2000-V8.1.2 (2008), Structural Analysis Program, Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California, USA.
  21. Stehle, J.S., Goldsworthy, H. and Mendis, P. (2001), "Reinforced concrete interior wide-band beam-column connections subjected to lateral earthquake loading", ACI Struct. J., 98(3), 270-279.
  22. TEC (2007), Turkish Earthquake Code, The Minister of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey.
  23. TS 500 (2000), Turkish Standard: Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Institute of Turkish Standards, Ankara, Turkey.
  24. XTRACT (2004), Cross Section Analysis Program of Structural Engineers, Imbsen Software Systems.