DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

System Identification and Pitch Control of a Planing Hull Ship with a Controllable Stern Intercepter

능동제어가 가능한 선미 인터셉터가 부착된 활주선형 선박의 시스템 식별과 자세 제어에 관한 연구

  • Choi, Hujae (Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Jongyong (Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Systems Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kim, Dongjin (Korea Research Institute of Ship and Ocean Engineering, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Sunyoung (Korea Research Institute of Ship and Ocean Engineering, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jooho (The 6th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Ahn, Jinhyeong (The 6th R&D Institute, Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Kim, Nakwan (Research Institute of Marine Systems Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • 최후재 (서울대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 박종용 (부경대학교 조선해양시스템공학과) ;
  • 김동진 (한국해양과학기술원 부설 선박해양플랜트연구소) ;
  • 김선영 (한국해양과학기술원 부설 선박해양플랜트연구소) ;
  • 이주호 (국방과학연구소 제6기술연구본부) ;
  • 안진형 (국방과학연구소 제6기술연구본부) ;
  • 김낙완 (서울대학교 해양시스템공학연구소)
  • Received : 2019.03.05
  • Accepted : 2018.07.09
  • Published : 2018.10.20

Abstract

Planing hull type ships are often equipped with interceptor or trim tab to improve the excessive trim angle which leads to poor resistance and sea keeping performances. The purpose of this study is to design a controller to control the attitude of the ship by controllable stern interceptor and validate the effectiveness of the attitude control by the towing tank test. Embedded controller, servo motor and controllable stern interceptor system were equipped with planing hull type model ship. Prior to designing the control algorithm, a model test was performed to identify the system dynamic model of the planing hull type ship including the stern interceptor. The matrix components of model were optimized by Genetic Algorithm. Using the identified model, PID controller which is a classical controller and sliding mode controller which is a nonlinear robust controller were designed. Gain tuning of the controllers and running simulation was conducted before the towing tank test. Inserting the designed control algorithm into the embedded controller of the model ship, the effectiveness of the active control of the stern interceptor was validated by towing tank test. In still water test with small disturbance, the sliding mode controller showed better performance of canceling the disturbance and the steady-state control performance than the PID controller.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, J.E., 1985. Adaptive selection methods for genetic algorithms. Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, Pittsburgh, United States of America, 24-26 July 1985.
  2. De Jong, K.A., 1975. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Engineering Doctoral Dissertation. The University of Michigan Ann Arbor.
  3. Ertogan, M., Wilson, P.A., Tayyar, G.T., & Ertugrul, S. 2017. Optimal trim control of a high-speed craft by trim tabs/inerceptors Part I: Pitch and surge coupled dynamic modelling using sea trial data. Ocean Engineering, 130, pp.300-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.007
  4. Faltinsen, O.M., 2005. Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  5. Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Inc.: Boston.
  6. Goldberg, D.E., 1991. Real-coded genetic algorithms, virtual alphabets, and blocking. Complex Systems, 5, pp.139-167.
  7. Holland, J.H., 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press: Michigan.
  8. Janikow, C.Z. & Michalewicz, Z., 1991. An experimental comparison of binary and floating point representations in genetic algorithms. Proceeding of 4th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, San Diego, United States of America, 13-16 July 1991.
  9. Jin, G.G. & Joo, S.R., 2000. A study on a real-coded genetic algorithm. Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Engineering, 6(4), pp.268-275.
  10. Karimi, M.H., Seif, M.S. & Abbaspoor, M., 2015. A study on vertical motions of high-speed planing boats with automatically controlled stern interceptors in calm water and head waves. Ships and Offshore Structure, 10(3) pp.335-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2013.867647
  11. Khalil, H.K., 2002. Nonlinear systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  12. Kim, D.J., Park, J.Y., Lee, J.H., Go, J.Y., & Rhee, K.P., 2011. Effects of trim tabs on running attitude and resistance performance of a water-jet propelled high speed vessel. Proceedings of the Annual Autumn Meating, SNAK, Mokpo, Republic of Korea, 3-4 November 2011.
  13. Kim, D.J., 2012. A study on the running attitude and dynamic stability of a semi-displacement round bilge vessel at high speed. Engineering Doctorial Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  14. Luca, F.D. & Pensa, C., 2012. Experimental investigation on conventional and unconventional interceptors. International Journal of Small Craft Technology Part B of The Royal Institution of Naval Architects transactions technical papers, 153, pp.B65-B72.
  15. Mansila, R.M., Aranda, J., Diaz, J.M. & Cruz, J., 2009. Parametric model identification of high-speed craft dynamics. Ocean Engineering, 36(12), pp.1025-1038, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.05.007
  16. Michalewicz, Z., 1996. Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution Programs. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
  17. Molini, A. Brizzolara, S., 2005. Hydrodynamics of interceptors: a fundamental study. International Conference on Marine Research and Transportation, Naples, Italy, 19-21 September 2005.
  18. Oh, K.T., Park, C.W., Kim, M.G., Park, J.H. & Kim, Y.D., 2012. Small UAV system identification in time domain. Korean Conference on Aeronautical And Space Sciences, Gangwon, Republic of Korea, 11-13 April, 2012.
  19. Rijkens, A.A.K., Keuning, J.A. & Huijsmans, R.H.M.. 2011. A computational tool for the design of ride control systems for fast planing vessels. International Shipbuilding Progress, 58(4), pp.165-190.
  20. Seo, K.C., Copakumar, N. & Atlar, M., 2013. Experimental investigation of dynamic trim control devices in fast speed vessel. Journal of Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research, 37(2), pp.137-142. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2013.37.2.137
  21. Sonnenburg, C.R. & Woolsey, C.A., 2013. Modeling, identification, and control of an unmanned surface vehicle. Journal of Field Robotics, 30(3), pp.371-398, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21452
  22. Wang, L.W., 1985. A study on motions of high speed planing boats with controllable flaps in regular waves. International Shipbuilding Progress, 32(365), pp.6-23. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISP-1985-3236502
  23. Whitley, D., 1989. The genitor algorithm and selection pressure: why rank-based allocation of reproductive trials is best. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications, Arlington, United States of America, 1989.