DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Influences on Domestic Wood Market by Prohibiting Illegal Wood Products Trade

불법목재의 교역 제한 조치가 국내 목재 시장에 미치는 영향 분석

  • Kim, Dong-Hyun (Division of Global Forestry, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Park, Hyun (Department of Forest Bio-Resources, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Lee, Ho Sang (Warm Temperate and Subtropical Forest Research Institute, National Institute of Forest Science)
  • 김동현 (국립산림과학원 국제산림연구과) ;
  • 박현 (국립산림과학원 산림생명자원연구부) ;
  • 이호상 (국립산림과학원 난대.아열대산림연구소)
  • Received : 2018.04.24
  • Accepted : 2018.08.23
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

This study conducted to estimate the influences of policy which prohibits illegal logging trade. Before analyzing of the economic effects for this policy, scenario methods were selected to inflect economic circumstance by implementing it. In order to do, the policy experiments were carried out using equilibrium displacement equation model. Results show that change ratio of log price was increased 0.066%~0.071%. Since the primary import country of log is New zealand which is high CPI score rather than Republic of Korea so that imported quantity of log was decreased thinly. Because imported log price is worked as a cost in the lumber market, if the imported log price was increased, supply of lumber has to be decreased. So that, not the change ratio of domestic lumber price was increased 0.885%~4.179% but supply of domestic lumber was increased 5.367% respectively along the goods features as a heterogeneity or homogeneity on the market.

이 연구의 목적은 "목재의 지속가능한 이용에 관한 법률"에 근거하여 불법목재의 교역을 제한하는 제도 시행에 앞서 국내 목재시장에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위하여 수행하였다. 시나리오 작성을 위해 부패인식지수를 활용하였고 이를 바탕으로 균형대체방정식 모형을 이용하여 정책실험을 수행하였다. 원목의 균형가격 변화율은 0.066%~0.071% 범위에서 상승할 것으로 분석되었다. 원목가격의 상승은 파생수요의 관계에 있는 제재목의 생산비에 반영되어 제재목의 공급량을 감소시킨다. 상품유형별로 대체효과에 의한 국산재 수요 확대와 국내 가격상승에 의한 공급량 확대를 감안하여 분석한 결과, 국산 제재목 가격 변화율의 범위는 0.885%~4.179%에서 증가하는 것으로 분석되었으며 이에 따라 국산 제재목의 공급량은 적어도 5.367% 증가될 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, B.I., Kim, E.G., Kim, H.H. and Kim, D.H. 2009. Effects on Domestic Wood Market by Climate Change. Journal of Rural Development 32: 109-131.
  2. Alemagi, D. and Kozak, R.A. 2011. Illegal logging in Cameroon: Causes and the path forward. Forest Policy and Economics 12: 554-561.
  3. Bouriaud, L. 2005. Causes of Illegal Logging in Central and Eastern Europe. Small-scale Forests Economics Management and Policy 4: 269-292.
  4. Ducan, B. and Buckrell, J. 2011. Controlling Illegal Logging: Consumer-Country Measures. Chatham House 10 St James's Square London SW1Y 4LE, UK. pp. 14.
  5. NIFOS (National Institute of Forest Sicence). 2016. Forecasting of future forest and forestry to establish 6th Forest sector mater plan. Internal reference.
  6. Koyuncu, C. and Yilmaz, R. 2008. The Impact of Corruption on Deforestation: A Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Developing Areas 7: 213-222.
  7. Kuemmerle, T., Chaskovskyy, O., Knorn, J., Radeloff, V.C., Kruhlov, I., Keeton, W.S. and Hostert, P. 2009. Forest cover change and illegal logging in the Ukrainian Carpathians in the transition period from 1988 to 2007. Remote Sensing of Environment 113: 1194-1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.02.006
  8. Lawson, S. and MacFaul, L. 2010. Illegal Logging and Related Trade. Chatha Australian Illegal Logging Prohibition Actm House, 10 St James Square, London SW1Y 4LE, UK. pp. 132.
  9. Lee, J.H., Sigmund, K., Dieckmann, U. and Iwasa, Y. 2015. Games of corruption: How to suppress illegal logging. Journal of Theoretical Biology 367: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.10.037
  10. Lee, S.M., Jang, C.S., Kim, K.D., Song, S.H. and Park, J.E. 2013. Analysis for effects of wood industry by prohibiting illegally harvested wood products import. Journal of Rural Development 37: 39-58.
  11. Li, R., Buongiorno, J., Turner, J.A., Zhu, S. and Prestemon, J. 2008. Long-term effects of eliminating illegal logging on the world forest industries, trade, and inventory. Forest Policy and Economics 10: 480-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.003
  12. Maryudi, A. 2016. Choosing timber legality verification as a policy instrument to combat illegal logging in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics 68: 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.010
  13. Palmer C. E. 2015. The Exent and Causes of Illegal Logging: an Analysis of a Major Cause of Tropical Deforestation in Indoensia. CSERGE Working Paper pp. 33.
  14. Ploega, J.V.D., Weerd, M.V., Masipiquenac, A.B. and Persoona, G.A. 2011. Illegal Logging in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, the Philippines. Conservation and Society 9: 202-215. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.86991
  15. Scotland, N. and Ludwig, S. 2002. Deforestation, the Timber Trade and Illegal Logging. EC Workshop on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade. Brussels, April 22nd - 24th, pp. 9.
  16. Seneca Creek Associates and LLC. 2004. "Illegal" Logging and Global Wood Markets: The Competitive Impacts on the U.S. Wood Products Industry and LLC. Maryland 20837, USA. pp. 19.
  17. Seol, M., Kim, Y.H. and Lee, H.S. 2015. Trends of Illegal Logging Prohibition Regulations: Focus on the Case of United States' Lacey Act. The Korean Society of International Agriculture 27: 589-594. https://doi.org/10.12719/KSIA.2015.27.5.589
  18. Sheikh, P. A. 2007. Illegal Logging(Background and Issues). CRS Report for Congress. pp. 10.
  19. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2016. Annual Report on Wood Using Survey. KFS, Daejeon Seo-Gu, Republic of Korea. pp. 304.
  20. KFS (Korea Forest Service). 2018. Statistics for Forest Products Trade. http://www.forest.go.kr/. (2018. 4. 17.).
  21. KOSIS (Korean Statistical Information Service). 2018. Corruption Perceptions Index. http://www.index.go.kr. (2018. 3. 28.).
  22. NIFOS (National Institute of Forest Sicence). 2018. Quarterly Report on Forestry Economy. http://know.nifos.go.kr. (2018. 4. 3.).
  23. Orangutan Foundation International. 2018. https://orangutan.org. (2018. 4. 5.).
  24. Lee, S.M., Kim,, K.D. and Song, S.H. 2013. The Supply and Demand Model and Outlook of Korean Forest Products. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Seoul, pp. 174.