DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pinch-Off Syndrome, a Rare Complication of Totally Implantable Venous Access Device Implantation: A Case Series and Literature Review

  • Ilhan, Burak Mehmet (Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine) ;
  • Sormaz, Ismail Cem (Department of General Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine) ;
  • Turkay, Rustu (Department of Radiology, Bakirkoy Education and Research Hospital)
  • Received : 2018.02.08
  • Accepted : 2018.08.02
  • Published : 2018.10.05

Abstract

Background: Pinch-off syndrome (POS) is a rare complication after totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implantation. In cancer patients, it is important to prevent this rare complication and to recognize it early if it does occur. We present a case series of POS after TIVAD implantation and the results of a literature search about this complication. Methods: From July 2006 to December 2015, 924 permanent implantable central venous catheter implantation procedures were performed. The most common indication was vascular access for chemotherapy. Results: POS occurred in 5 patients in our clinic. Two patients experienced POS within 2 weeks, and the other 3 patients were admitted to department of surgery, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine at 6 to 14 months following implantation. The catheters were found to be occluded during medication administration, and all patients complained of serious pain. The transected fragments of the catheters had migrated to the heart. They were successfully removed under angiography with a single-loop snare. Conclusion: POS is a serious complication after TIVAD implantation. It is important to be aware of this possibility and to make an early diagnosis in order to prevent complications such as drug extravasation and occlusion events.

Keywords

References

  1. Vescia S, Baumgartner AK, Jacobs VR, et al. Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Ann Oncol 2008;19:9-15.
  2. El Hammoumi M, El Ouazni M, Arsalane A, El Oueriachi F, Mansouri H, Kabiri el H. Incidents and complications of permanent venous central access systems: a series of 1,460 cases. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;47: 117-23. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2014.47.2.117
  3. Bow EJ, Kilpatrick MG, Clinch JJ. Totally implantable ve- nous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: a randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1267. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1267
  4. Hinke DH, Zandt-Stastny DA, Goodman LR, Quebbeman EJ, Krzywda EA, Andris DA. Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology 1990;177:353-6. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217768
  5. Fazeny-Dorner B, Wenzel C, Berzlanovich A, et al. Central venous catheter pinch-off and fracture: recognition, prevention and management. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 31:927-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704022
  6. Magney JE, Flynn DM, Parsons JA, et al. Anatomical mechanisms explaining damage to pacemaker leads, defibrillator leads, and failure of central venous catheters adjacent to the sternoclavicular joint. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1993;16(3 Pt 1):445-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01607.x
  7. Mirza B, Vanek VW, Kupensky DT. Pinch-off syndrome: case report and collective review of the literature. Am Surg 2004;70:635-44.
  8. Cho JB, Park IY, Sung KY, Baek JM, Lee JH, Lee DS. Pinch-off syndrome. J Korean Surg Soc 2013;85:139-44. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.3.139
  9. Bessoud B, de Baere T, Kuoch V, et al. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:527-32. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800527
  10. Fisher RG, Ferreyro R. Evaluation of current techniques for nonsurgical removal of intravascular iatrogenic foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978;130:541-8. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.130.3.541
  11. Gabelmann A, Kramer S, Gorich J. Percutaneous retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1509-13. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761509
  12. Fragou M, Gravvanis A, Dimitriou V, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the land- mark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med 2011;39:1607-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a1ae
  13. Tamura A, Sone M, Ehara S, et al. Is ultrasound-guided central venous port placement effective to avoid pinch-off syndrome? J Vasc Access 2014;15:311-6. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000201

Cited by

  1. Comparison between ultrasound-guided TIVAD via the right innominate vein and the right internal jugular vein approach vol.19, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0651-0
  2. Fracture and embolization of an implantable venous access device in patient with atrial septal defect vol.2020, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjaa548
  3. Deltopectoral insertion of port‐a‐cath for improved aesthetic aspect in women undergoing chemotherapy: A case series vol.27, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.14209