DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reduction of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures with Gillies Approach

길리씨 접근법을 통한 협골궁 골절의 정복

  • Shin, Dong Keun (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Young Su (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shim, Woo Sub (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Hahn Jin (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine)
  • 신동근 (충북대학교 의과대학 충북대학교병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 김영수 (충북대학교 의과대학 충북대학교병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 심우섭 (충북대학교 의과대학 충북대학교병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 정한진 (충북대학교 의과대학 충북대학교병원 이비인후과학교실)
  • Received : 2017.12.27
  • Accepted : 2018.04.16
  • Published : 2018.11.25

Abstract

Background and Objectives The incidence of facial bone fracture is increasing. The zygomatic bone, due to its anatomical prominence, is the second most common site of all facial bone fractures. In this study, we present the clinical experiences of zygomatic arch fracture in a tertiary hospital and introduce the Gillies approach for reduction and its outcome results. Subjects and Method We collected data from retrospective chart reviews of patients who underwent surgeries from 2010 to 2017 for zygomatic arch fractures at Chungbuk National University Hospital. Data were analyzed according to age, gender, cause of trauma, location of trauma, and clinical symptoms including trismus. All surgery was performed under general anesthesia and via the use of Gillies approach. The result of surgery was evaluated by postoperative facial computed tomography. Results Sixteen patients underwent surgery for zygomatic arch fracture. The patients had the average age of 41.3 years, a male predominance of 15:1 and physical assault as the most common cause of trauma. The time lag between injury and surgical reduction was 5.5 days. The surgical outcomes were assessed 'good' in 14 cases and 'moderate' in one case. Patients who had trismus preoperatively were resolved of it in all cases after operation. Postoperative complications were absent. Conclusion The Gillies approach proved to be a relatively easy, safe, and reliable method, and its surgical outcomes was satisfactory in our experiences.

Keywords

References

  1. Stack BC, Ruggiero FP. Maxillary and periorbital fractures. In: Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD, editors. Head and Neck Surgery-Otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2006. p.975-94.
  2. Kim CH, Kim H, Kil DS, Yang HS, Yoon DB. [A statistical study of fractures of the facial bone]. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 1987;30(1):105-12.
  3. Lee CH, Chang HK, Song IS. [Operative results in orbital floor fracture associated with malar tripod fracture]. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 1999;40(7):1739-45.
  4. Kim JG, We J W, Kwon J H, Cho J H. [Classification a nd clinical analysis of zygomatic fractures]. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2008;51(4):326-30.
  5. Werner JA, Frenkler JE, Lippert BM, Folz BJ. Isolated zygomatic arch fracture: report on a modified surgical technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109(3):1085-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200203000-00047
  6. Zingg M, Laedrach K, Chen J, Chowdhury K, Vuillemin T, Sutter F, et al. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: a review of 1025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50(8):778-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90266-3
  7. Ungari C, Filiaci F, Riccardi E, Rinna C, Iannetti G. Etiology and incidence of zygomatic fracture: a retrospective study related to a series of 642 patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012;16(11):1559-62.
  8. Honig JF, Merten HA. Classification system and treatment of zygomatic arch fractures in the clinical setting. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15(6):986-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200411000-00019
  9. Kim J, Kim S, Chung S, Chung YK. Zygomatic arch fracture: a new classification and treatment algorithm with epidemiologic analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25(4):1389-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000864
  10. Yamamoto K, Murakami K, Sugiura T, Fujimoto M, Inoue M, Kawakami M, et al. Clinical analysis of isolated zygomatic arch fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(3):457-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.276
  11. Moon JH, Kwon MS, Park SW, Kim YH, Han CY, Kwon JH, et al. [Retrospective study on 527 patients with maxillofacial trauma: a 5-year experience]. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2004;47(4):362-7.
  12. Covington DS, Wainwright DJ, Teichgraeber JF, Parks DH. Changing patterns in the epidemiology and treatment of zygoma fractures: 10-year review. J Trauma 1994;37(2):243-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199408000-00016
  13. Karlan MS, Cassisi NJ. Fractures of the zygoma. a geometric, biomechanical, and surgical analysis. Arch Otolaryngol 1979;105(6):320-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1979.00790180018004
  14. Strong EB, Sykes JM. Zygoma complex fractures. Facial Plast Surg 1998;14(1):105-15. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1085306
  15. Fujii N, Yamashiro M. Classification of malar complex fractures using computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41(9):562-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90158-1
  16. Kreutziger KL. Surgical management of complex maxillofacial fractures. Laryngoscope 1982;92(2):192-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.1982.92.2.192
  17. Rowe NL, Williams JL. Fractures of the zygomatic complex and orbit. In: Maxillofacial injuries. 1st ed. New York: Livingstone Churchill; 1985. p.435-510.
  18. Gillies HD, Kilner TP, Stone D. Fractures of the malar-zygomatic compound: with a description of a new X-ray position. Br J Surg 1927;14(56):651-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800145612
  19. Swanson E, Vercler C, Yaremchuk MJ, Gordon CR. Modified gillies approach for zygomatic arch fracture reduction in the setting of bicoronal exposure. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23(3):859-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dd5c3
  20. Carter TG, Bagheri S, Dierks EJ. Towel clip reduction of the depressed zygomatic arch fracture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63(8):1244-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.04.018
  21. Kim DK, Kim SK, Lee JH, Park CH. Aqua splint suture technique in isolated zygomatic arch fractures. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271(4):707-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2602-1
  22. Akizuki H, Yoshida H, Michi K. Ultrasonographic evaluation during reduction of zygomatic arch fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990;18(6):263-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80428-7
  23. Jang CH, Wang WK, Kim ID, Cho JH, Lee JH, Yoon SW. [Open reduction of zygomatic fracture using frontotemporal incision]. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 1992;35(4):525-32.
  24. Gulicher D, Krimmel M, Reinert S. The role of intraoperative ultrasonography in zygomatic complex fracture repair. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35(3):224-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.10.005
  25. Pedemonte C, Saez F, Vargas I, Gonzalez E, Canales M, Lazo D, et al. C-arm as intraoperative control in reduction of isolated zygomatic arch fractures: a randomized clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20(1):79-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0531-4
  26. Li Z, Yang RT, Li ZB. Applications of computer-assisted navigation for the minimally invasive reduction of isolated zygomatic arch fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73(9):1778-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.033
  27. de Queiroz SB, de Lima VN, Bazani PL, Bonardi JP, Magro-Filho O. The use of foley catheter for treatment of unstable fracture zygomatic arch. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(4):1012. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002668
  28. Park CH, Hong SJ, Lee JH, Yang SM, Jung KN, Kwon TK, et al. [The stabilizing method of zygomatic arch fracture using aqua splint suture technique]. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2007;50(3):220-4.