Informatization Policy (정보화정책)

National Information Society Agency (한국지능정보사회진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Research Trends on Open Innovation using Topic Modeling

토픽 모델링을 이용한 개방형 혁신 연구동향 분석 및 정책 방향 모색

  • 조성배 (한국정보화진흥원 전자정부성과제도팀) ;
  • 신신애 (한국정보화진흥원 전자정부성과제도팀) ;
  • 강동석 (한국정보화진흥원 전자정부본부)
  • Received : 2018.06.28
  • Accepted : 2018.07.25
  • Published : 2018.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In February 2018, the Korean government established the "Comprehensive Plans for Government Innovation" in order to realize 'the people-centered government'. The core of the comprehensive plans is participation of the people, which is very similar to open innovation where social issues are solved by ideas and capabilities of the private sector rather than those of the government. Therefore, this study was conducted by extracting open innovation topics through topic modeling based on LDA(Latent Dirichlet Allocation) as English abstract-data from 2003, when the plans for open innovation was first announced, to April 2018. Based on the extracted results, it also conducted a comparative analysis with "Comprehensive Plans for Government Innovation." The study has significant implications in that it derives the relationship between the subjects, analyzes the present policies of Korea on open innovation and suggests directions for development.

2018년 2월, 우리나라 정부는 '국민이 주인인 정부'를 실현하고자 정부혁신 종합추진계획을 수립하였다. 종합계획의 핵심은 국민 참여이며, 정부 내부의 역량만을 통해 가치를 창출하는 것이 아닌 시민, 기업의 아이디어와 역량을 함께 모아 정부가 해결할 수 없는 사회 현안을 해결한다는 관점에서 개방형 혁신(Open Innovation)과 매우 유사하다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 개방형 혁신이 처음 발표된 2003년부터 2018년 4월까지의 영문 초록 데이터로 LDA(Latent Dirichlet Allocation) 기반의 토픽모델링을 이용하여 개방형 혁신 연구 주제들을 도출하고, 도출된 주제간 토픽 네트워크 분석을 실시하였다. 도출된 결과를 바탕으로 정부혁신 종합추진계획의 추진과제와 비교 분석하였다. 본 연구의 시사점은 개방형 혁신에 대한 연구 주제와 주제간 관계를 도출하고, 그 결과를 정부혁신 종합추진계획과의 비교를 통해 개방형 혁신 관련 우리나라 정책의 향후 발전방향을 제시하였다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김갑조.윤다혜.황종환.선동주 (2017). "특허 토픽 모델링과 성장주기곡선을 통한 유망기술 발굴." 한국지능시스템학회 논문지, 27(4): 357-363.
  2. 김상겸.장성용 (2016). "토픽모델링을 이용한 국내 산업경영 공학 연구동향 분석." 한국경영공학회지, 21(3): 71.
  3. 김석관 (2008). "Chesbrough의 개방형 혁신 이론." 과학기술정책. 172: 2-23.
  4. 김현정.조남옥.신경식 (2015). "항공산업 미래유망 분야 선정을 위한 텍스트 마이닝 기반의 트렌드 분석." 지능정보연구, 21(1): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.13088/JIIS.2015.21.1.65
  5. 김현희.이혜영 (2016). "토픽 네트워크 분석을 활용한 데이터 마이닝 분야 연구 논문 분석." 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 21(5): 141-148.
  6. 문정욱 (2017). "영국의 디지털기반 정부혁신 동향 : 'Government Transformation Strategy 2017 to 2020' 보고서를 중심으로." 정보통신정책연구원 동향, 29(11): 22-27.
  7. 박상혁.김창완.오승희 (2014). "개방형 혁신체계 구축을 위한 퍼실리테이터를 활용한 중소기업 집단문제해결 모형에 대한 연구" 벤처창업연구, 9(5).
  8. 서병조.신선영 (2017). "토픽 모델링을 활용한 한국의 플랫폼정부 연구동향 분석", 정보화정책, 24(3): 3-26. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2017.24.3.003
  9. 신성현 (2017). "열린 혁신 정책효과성 제고 핵심요인에 대한 탐색적 연구 - 농촌진흥청 조직문화 및 열린 혁신수준진단 결과를 중심으로", 한국행정학회 학술발표논문집, 1091-1105.
  10. 안정국.이소현.안은희.김희웅 (2016). "국내 핀테크 동향 및 모바일 결제 서비스 분석:텍스트 마이닝 기법 활용", 정보화정책, 23(3): 26-42. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2016.23.3.026
  11. 안치수.이영덕 (2011). "우리나라 개방형 혁신활동의 영향요인에 관한 실증분석 연구." 기술혁신학회지, 14(3): 431-465.
  12. 이창근.강대신.정선양 (2015). "개방형혁신의 공공연구부문 적용방안 연구 - KIST ORP 사례를 중심으로." 한국기술혁신학회 학술대회, 164-173.
  13. 이태헌.윤영주.김희웅 (2016). "텍스트마이닝을 이용한 정보보호인식 분석 및 강화 방안 모색." 정보화정책, 23(4): 76-94. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2016.23.4.076
  14. 정보통신정책연구원 (2009). 국내외 공공-민간 온라인 소통 활성화 현황 및 시사점: 영국 Power of Information Taskforce Report를 중심으로.
  15. 청와대 (2017). "문재인 정부 국정과제." http://www1.president.go.kr (검색일: 2018.06.22.).
  16. 한국산업기술진흥원 (2013). 영국의 혁신주도 성장전략과 정책제언.
  17. 행정안전부 (2015). 보도자료 "국민의 행복 달성, 가치 실현을 지원하는 전자정부 구현" http://www.mois.go.kr (검색일: 2018.06.22).
  18. 행정안전부 (2018). "정부혁신 종합 추진계획." http://www.mois.go.kr (검색일: 2018.06.22.).
  19. Assar, S. & Boughzala, I. & Isckia, T. (2011). "eGovernment Trends in the Web 2.0 Era and the Open Innovation Perspective: An Exploratory Field Study." International Conference on Electronic Government EGOV 2011: Electronic Government, pp. 210-222.
  20. Blei, D. M. & Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. (2003), "Latent dirichlet allocation, Journal of Machine Learning Research." 3, 993-1022.
  21. Blei, D. M. & Lafferty, J. D. (2005). "Correlated Topic Models." Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 147-154.
  22. Blei, D. M. (2012). "Probabilistic topic models." Communications of the ACM, 55(4): 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  23. Brunswicker, S. & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). "Open Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators." Journal of Small Business Management, Volume53, Issue4.
  24. Chesbrough, H. (2003a). "Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology." Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  25. Chesbrough, H. (2003b). "The era of open innovation." MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 3541.
  26. Colombo, G. & Dell'Era, C. & Frattini, F. (2011). "New Product Development (NPD) Service Suppliers in Open Innovation Practices: Processes and Organization for Knowledge Exchange and Integration." International Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 165-204. https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391961100312X
  27. Direct of Digital Engagement (2009). "Digital Engagement: Update on Power of Information."
  28. Durst, S. & Stahle, P. (2013). "Success Factors of Open Innovation - A Literature Review." International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Volume (4) : Issue (4) : 2013.
  29. Felin, T. & Zenger, T. R. (2014). "Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice." Research Policy, Volume 43, Issue 5, June 2014, pp. 914-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.006
  30. Hornik, K. & Grun, B. (2011). "topic models : An R package for fitting topic models." Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), pp. 1-30.
  31. Islam, A. M. (2012). "Methods of Open Innovation Knowledge Sharing Risk Reduction: A Case Study." International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, Vol. 2, No. 4.
  32. Janssen, M. & Konopnicki, D. & Snowdon, J. & Ojo, A. (2017). "Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD)." Information Systems Frontiers, April 2017, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp. 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2
  33. Kankanhalli, A. & Zuiderwijk, A. & Tayi, GK. (2017). "Open innovation in the public sector: A research agenda." Government Information Quarterly, Volume 34, Issue 1, January 2017, pp. 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.12.002
  34. Lee, K. H. & Jung, H. J. & Song, M (2016). "Subject-method topic network analysis in communication studies." Scientometrics, Volume 109, Issue 3, pp. 1761-1787.
  35. Lee, S. M. & Hwang, T. W. & Choi, D. H. (2012). "Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries." Management Decision, Vol. 50 Issue: 1, pp. 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211194921
  36. Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). "Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions." Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 25, No. 1 (February 2011), pp. 75-93. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.3.zol75
  37. Lopez-Vega, H. & Tell, F. & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2016). "Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation." Research Policy, Volume 45, Issue 1, February 2016, pp. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.08.003
  38. Maier, D. & Waldherr, A. & Miltner, P. & Jahnichen, P. & Pfetsch, B. (2017). "Exploring Issues in a Networked Public Sphere: Combining Hyperlink Network Analysis and Topic Modeling." Social Science Computer Review, pp. 1-18.
  39. Mergel, I. (2017). "Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov." Public Management Review, 20:5, pp. 726-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044
  40. Mimno, D. & McCallum, A. (2012). "Topic models conditioned on arbitrary features with dirichlet-multinomial regression." arXiv preprint arXiv: 1206.3278.
  41. MIT Sloan (2011). "Top 10 Lessons on the New Business of Innovation." MIT Sloanselect Collection Winter 2011, "The Era of Open Innovation." pp. 35-41.
  42. Nesta (2012). "Plan I: The Case for Innovation-led Growth." http://www.nesta.org.uk/report/plan-i. (Retrived on June 22, 2018)
  43. Newman, M. (2010). "Networks : An Introduction." Oxford University Press .
  44. OECD (2017). "Embracing Innovation in Government Global Trends."
  45. Paulini, M. & Maher, M. L. & Murty, P. (2014). "Motivating participation in online innovation communities." International Journal of Web Based Communities, 10:1, pp. 94-114. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWBC.2014.058388
  46. Poulin, D. & Tucci, C. & Viscusi, G. (2017). "Open Innovation in the Public Sector: Review and Integration of the Management and Public Administration Literatures." 14th Scandinavian Workshop on E-Government (SWEG), Sundsvall, Sweden, February.
  47. Ren, S. & Su, P. (2015). "Open innovation and intellectual property strategy: the catch-up processes of two Chinese pharmaceutical firms." Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Volume 27, 2015 - Issue 10.
  48. Silge, J. & Robinson, D. (2018) Text Mining with R. O'Reilly. http://www.tidytextmining.com (Retrived on June 22, 2018).
  49. UK Cabinet Office (2017). "Government Transformation Strategy 2017 to 2020." http://www.gov.uk. (Retrived on June 22, 2018)
  50. US Government (2016). "Open Government Initiative - US Department of State." https://www.state.gov/open/. (Retrived on June 22, 2018).
  51. Viscusi, G. & Poulin, D. & Tucci, C. (2015). "Open innovation research and e-government: clarifying the connections between two fields." XII Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS (itAIS2015), Roma, Italy, 9th - 10th of October, 2015.
  52. We st, J. & Salter, A. & Vanhaverbeke, W. & Chesbrough, H. (2014). "Open innovation: The next decade." Research Policy, Volume 43, Issue 5, June 2014, pp. 805-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001