DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Patent Portfolio Composition and New Product Introduction: The Moderating Role of Technological Resource Rearrangement

특허 포트폴리오 구성과 신제품 출시 성과: 특허 재정비 활동의 조절효과를 중심으로

  • 김나미 (고려대학교 기업경영연구원) ;
  • 이종선 (한국과학기술원 혁신및기업가정신 연구센터)
  • Received : 2018.06.26
  • Accepted : 2018.08.27
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

In a rapidly changing technology environment, managing and rearranging the patent portfolios is one of the main sources of competitive advantage for firms. This study analyzes the effects of patent portfolio composition on new product introduction related to resource allocation. This study also looks at the moderating role of rearranging the patent portfolios on new product introduction. Our empirical analysis of the global pharmaceutical industry shows that firms with high-value patent portfolios exhibit a tendency to launch new products, and patent portfolio diversity shows a U-shaped relationship with new product introduction. In addition, the patent portfolio rearrangement positively moderates the relationship between patent portfolio diversity and new product introduction. The results are expected to provide implications for firms' patent portfolio composition and patent portfolio rearrangement related to innovation performance such as new product introduction.

Keywords

References

  1. 김별아, 이종국, 송상영 2014. "제약산업에서의 신제품 개발이 기업가치에 미치는 영향: 신제품의 혁신유형에 따른 기업평판의 조절효과," 경영학연구 (43:2), pp. 443-463.
  2. 김봉선, 김나미, 김언수 2016. "어디서 오는 지식이 혁신성과로 연결 되는가: DVD 표준특허의 지식탐색 유형과 혁신성과," 경영학연구 (45:6), pp. 1955-1983.
  3. 안연식 2010. "기업의 특허 역량이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증 분석: 우수 벤처기업을 중심으로," 지식경영연구 (11:1), pp. 83-96.
  4. 추기능, 박규호 2010. "특허의 경제적 수명의 결정요인에 관한 연구: 갱신자료를 활용한 생존분석," 지식경영연구 (11:1), pp. 65-81.
  5. Aboulnasr, K ., Narasimhan, O., Blair, E., and Chandy, R. 2008. "Competitive Response to Radical Product Innovations," Journal of Marketing (72:3), pp. 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.94
  6. Ahuja, G., and Lampert, C. M. 2001. "Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions," Strategic Management Journal (22:6-7), pp. 521-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176
  7. Ahuja, G., and Katila, R. 2004. "Where Do Resources Come From? The Role of Idiosy ncratic Situations," Strategic Management Journal (25:8-9), pp. 887-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.401
  8. Arundel, A., and Kabla, I. 1998. "What Percentage of Innovations Are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms," Research Policy (27:2), pp. 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X
  9. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., and Almeida, J. 2000. "Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity And Imitability on International Growth," Academy of Management Journal (43:5), pp. 909-924. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556419
  10. Barney, J. B. 1991. "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management (17:1), pp. 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  11. Barron, D. N., West, E., and Hannan, M. T. 1994. "A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990," American Journal of Sociology (100:2), pp. 381-421. https://doi.org/10.1086/230541
  12. Blau, A. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure, New York: Free Press.
  13. Boudreau, K. J., Lacetera, N., and Lakhani, K. R. 2011. "Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science (57:5), pp. 843-863. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1322
  14. Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. "On the Measurement of Organizational Slack," Academy of Management Review (6:1), pp. 29-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4287985
  15. Cassiman, B., Colombo, G. M., Garrone, P., and Veugelers, R. 2005. "The Impact of M&A on the R&D Process: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Technological- and Market-Relatedness," Research Policy (34:2), pp. 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.002
  16. Chen, Y., and Chang, K. 2010. "The Relationship between a Firm's Patent Quality and Its Market Value -The Case of US Pharmaceutical Industry," Technological Forecasting & Social Change (77:1), pp. 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.003
  17. Chi, T. 1994. "Trading in Strategic Resources: Necessary Conditions, Transaction Cost Problems, and Choice of Exchange Structure," Strategic Management Journal (15:4), pp. 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150403
  18. Cohen, W. M., and Levinthal, D. 1994. "A Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm," Management Science (40:2), pp. 227-251. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.2.227
  19. Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall. Inc.: New Jersey.
  20. Drazin, R., and Rao, H. 2002. "Harnessing Managerial Knowledge to Implement Product-Line Extensions: How Do Mutual Fund Families Allocate Portfolio Managers to Old and New Funds?," Academy of Management Journal (45:3), pp. 609-619. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069385
  21. Dierickx, I., and Cool, K. 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science (35:12), pp. 1504-1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504
  22. Ding, M., and Eliashberg, J. 2002. "Structuring the New Product Development Pipeline," Management Science (48:3), pp. 1343-1363.
  23. Fleming, L. 2001. "Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search," Management Science (47:1), pp. 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671
  24. Fleming, L. 2007. "Breakthroughs and the "Long Tail" of Innovation," MIT Slone Management Review (49:1), pp. 69-74.
  25. Galunic, D. C., and Rodan, S. 1998. "Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpetarian Recombination," Strategic Management Journal (19:12), pp. 1193-1201. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998120)19:12<1193::AID-SMJ5>3.0.CO;2-F
  26. Gilbert, C. G. 2005. "Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource vs. Routine Rigidity," Academy of Management Journal (48:5), pp. 741-763. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803920
  27. Grant, R. M. 1991. "The Resource Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation," California Management Review (33:3), pp. 114-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  28. Greve, H. R. 2003. "A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding," Academy of Management Journal (46:6), pp. 685-702. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040661
  29. Griliches, Z. 1990. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature (28:4), pp. 1661-1707.
  30. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, M., and Vopel, K. 1999. "Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions," Review of Economics and Statistics (81:3), pp. 511-515. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465399558265
  31. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., and Vopel. K. 2003. "Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights," Research Policy (32:8), pp. 1343-1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
  32. Henderson, R. M., and Clark, K. B. 1990. "Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms," Administrative Science Quarterly (35:1), pp. 9-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  33. Henderson, R. M., and Cockburn, I. 1996. "Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery," The RAND Journal of Economics (27:1), pp. 32-59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555791
  34. Haunschild, P. R., and Beckman, C. M. 1998. "When Do Interlocks Matter? A lternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence," Administrative Science Quarterly (43:4), pp. 815-844. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393617
  35. Hausman, J., Hall, B., and Griliches, Z. 1984. "Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents R&D Relationship," Econometrica (52:4), pp. 909-938. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911191
  36. Helfat, C. E. 1994a. "Evolutionary Trajectories in Petroleum Firm Research and Development," Management Science (40:12), pp. 1720-1747. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.12.1720
  37. Helfat, C. E. 1994b. "Firm-specificity in Corporate Applied R&D," Organization Science (5:2), pp. 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.173
  38. Henderson, R. 1993. "Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry," The RAND Journal of Economics (24:2), pp. 248-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555761
  39. Jaffe, A. B., and Lerner, J. 2001. "Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies," The RAND Journal of Economics (32:1), pp. 167-198. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696403
  40. Joecks, J., Pull, K., and Vetter, K. 2013. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a "Critical Mass?"," Journal of Business Ethics (118:1), pp. 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
  41. Jun, S., Park, S. S., and Jang, D. S. 2012. "Patent Management for Technology Forecasting: A Case Study of the Bio-Industry," Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (17:6), pp. 539-546.
  42. Katila, R., and Ahuja, G. 2002. "Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction," Academy of Management Journal (45:6), pp. 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069433
  43. Khanna, R., Guler, I., and Nerkar, A. 2016. "Fail Often, Fail Big, and Fail Fast? Learning from Small Failures and R&D Performance in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Academy of Management Journal (59:2), pp. 436-459. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1109
  44. Kim, N. M., and Kim, E. S. 2015. "Board Capital and Exploration: From a Resource Provisional Perspective," Management Decision (53:9), pp. 2156-2174. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2014-0648
  45. Klingebiel, R., and Rammer, C. 2014. "Resource Allocation Strategy for Innovation Portfolio Management," Strategic Management Journal (35:2), pp. 246-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2107
  46. Kogut, B., and Zander, U. 1992. "Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology," Organization Science (3:3), pp. 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  47. Lahiri, N. 2010. "Geographic Distribution of R&D Activity: How Does It Affect Innovation Quality?," Academy of Management Journal (53:5), pp. 1194-1209. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533233
  48. Lanjouw, J. O., and Schankerman, M. 1999. "The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators," National Bureau of Economic Research No.7345.
  49. Laursen, K., and Salter, A. 2006. "Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms," Strategic Management Journal (27:2), pp. 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
  50. Leiponen, A., and Helfat, C. 2010. "Innovation Objectives, Knowledge Sources, and the Benef its of Breadth," Strategic Management Journal (31:2), pp. 224-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.807
  51. Lemley, M. A. 2001. "Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office," Northwestern University Law Review (95:4), pp. 1495-1529.
  52. Lin, B., and Chen, J. 2005. "Corporate Technology Portfolios and R&D Performance Measures: A Study of Technology Intensive Firms," R&D Management (35:2), pp. 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00380.x
  53. Lin, B., Chen, C., and Wu, H. 2006. "Patent Portfolio Diversity, Technology Strategy, and Firm Value," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (53:1), pp. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.861813
  54. Liu, K. 2014. "Human Capital, Social Collaboration, and Patent Renewal within U.S. Pharmaceutical Firms," Journal of Management (40:2), pp. 616-636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313511117
  55. Marco, A. C., Myers, A. F., Graham, S. J. H., D'Agostino, P. A., and Apple, K. 2015. "The USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset: Description and Analysis," USPTO Economic working paper No. 2015-2.
  56. McGrath, R . G., and Nerkar, A. 2004. "Real Options Reasoning and a New Look at the R&D Investment Strategies of Pharmaceutical Firms," Strategic Management Journal (25:1), pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.358
  57. Medcof, J. W. 2000. "The Resource-Based View and Transnational Technology Strategy," The Journal of High Technology Management Research (11:1), pp. 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00021-3
  58. Mezias S. J., and Glynn, M. A. 1993. "The Three Faces of Corporate Renewal: Institution, Revolution, and Evolution," Strategic Management Journal (14:2), pp. 77-161. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140202
  59. Moliterno, T. P., and Wiersema, M. F. 2007. "Firm Performance, Rent Appropriation, and the Strategic Resource Divestment Capability," Strategic Management Journal (28:11), pp. 1065-1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.630
  60. Moorthy, S., and Polley, D. E. 2010. "Technological Knowledge Breadth and Depth: Performance Impacts," Journal of Knowledge Management (14:3), pp. 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011050102
  61. Murray, F., and O'Mahony, S. 2007. "Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science," Organization Science (18:6), pp. 1006-1021. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0325
  62. Nelson, R. R. 1961. "Uncertainty, Learning, and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development Efforts," Review of Economics and Statistics (43:4), pp. 351-364. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927475
  63. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kunter, M. H. 1990. Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design (3rd ed.), Irwin: Homewood, IL.
  64. Nohria, N., and Gulati, R. 1996. "Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?," Academy of Management Journal (39:5), pp. 1245-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/256998
  65. Oerlemans, L. A. G., K noben, J., and Pretorius, M. W. 2013. "Alliance Portfolio Diversity, Radical and Incremental Innovation: The Moderating Role of Technology Management," Technovation (33:6-7), pp. 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.004
  66. Porter, A., Roper, T., Mason, T., Rossini, F., Banks, J., and Wiedweholt, B. 1991. Forecasting and Management of Technology, John wiley & Sons, inc.: New York.
  67. Patel, P., and Pavitt, K. 1997. "The Technological Competencies of the World's Largest Firms: Complex and Path Dependent, But Not Much Variety," Research Policy (26:2), pp. 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X
  68. Penner-Hahn, J. D. 1998. "Firm and Environmental Influences on the Mode and Sequence of Foreign Research and Development Activities," Strategic Management Journal (19:2), pp. 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199802)19:2<149::AID-SMJ944>3.0.CO;2-I
  69. Penner-Hahn, J. D., and Shaver, M. 2005. "Does International Research and Development Increase Output? An Analysis of Japanese Pharmaceutical Firms," Strategic Management Journal (26:2), pp. 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.436
  70. Peteraf, M. A. 1993. "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View," Strategic Management Journal (14:2), pp. 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
  71. Pitkethly, R. H. 2001. "Intellectual Property Strategy in Japanese and UK Companies: Patent Licensing Decisions and Learning Opportunities," Research Policy (30:3), pp. 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00084-6
  72. Rosenberg, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box: Technologies and Economics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  73. Rosen kopf, L., and Nerkar, A. 2001. "Beyond Local Search: Boundary-spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry," Strategic Management Journal (22:4), pp. 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
  74. Sadowski, M., and Roth, A. 1999. "Technology Leadership Can Pay Off," Research Technology Management (42:6), pp. 32-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1999.11671315
  75. Schankerman, M. 1998. "How Valuable Is Patent Protection? Estimates by Technology Field," The RAND Journal of Economics (29:1), pp. 77-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555817
  76. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  77. Serrano, C. J. 2010. "The Dynamics of the Transfer and Renewal of Patents," The RAND Journal of Economics (41:4), pp. 686-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00117.x
  78. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., and Ireland, D. 2007. "Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box," Academy of Management Review (32:1), pp. 273-292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
  79. Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., and Clark, K. D. 2005. "Existing Knowledge, Knowledge Creation Capability, and the Rate of New Product Introduction in High-Technology Firms," Academy of Management Journal (48:2), pp. 346-357. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.16928421
  80. Somaya, D. 2012. "Patent Strategy and Management: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Management (38:4), pp. 1084-1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312444447
  81. Sorenson O. 2000. "Letting the Market Work for You: An Evolutionary Perspective on Product Strategy," Strategic Management Journal (21:5), pp. 577-592. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<577::AID-SMJ105>3.0.CO;2-C
  82. Sorescu, A ., Chandy, R ., and Prabhu, J. 2003. "Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals," Journal of Marketing (67:4), pp. 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.4.82.18687
  83. Srivastava, M., and Gnyawali, D. 2011. "When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation," Academy of Management Journal (54:4), pp. 797-810. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870140
  84. Stephan, M. 2002. "Diversification Profiles of Multinational Corporations: An Empirical Investigation of Geographical Diversification, Product Diversification and Technological Diversification," in Proceedings of the 28th European International Business Academy Conference, Athens, Greece.
  85. Sull, D. 2003. "Managing by Commitments," Harvard Business Review (81:6), pp. 82-91.
  86. Teece, D. J. 1986. "Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy," Research Policy (15:6), pp. 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  87. Thomas, P. 1999. "The Effect of Technological Impact Upon Patent Renewal Decisions," Technology Analysis & Strategic Management (11:2), pp. 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/095373299107492
  88. Trajtenberg, M. 1990. "A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Information," The RAND Journal of Economics (21:1), pp. 172-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
  89. Tsai, K. H., and Wang, J. C. 2009. "External Technology Sourcing and Innovation Performance in LMT Sectors: An Analysis Based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey," Research Policy (38:3), pp. 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.007
  90. Verona, G. 1999. "A Resource-Based View of Product Development," Academy of Management Review (24:1), pp. 132-142. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580445
  91. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M., Furner, J., Liu, R. C., and Ma, H. 2007. "Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and New Knowledge Production," Research Policy (36:6), pp. 850-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.007