DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Assessment and Contingency Prediction considering Work Characteristics for Modular Plant Construction Projects

모듈러 플랜트의 업무특성을 고려한 위험 평가 및 예비비 예측

  • Kang, Hyunwook (The Chartered Research Institute of Construction Costs) ;
  • Kim, Jongwook (Corporation of Moo-Young Construction Management) ;
  • Kim, Yongsu (Faculty, Department of Architectural Engineering, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2018.05.13
  • Accepted : 2018.08.28
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the risk and predict the contingency for modular plant construction projects. Considering the work characteristics of the modular plant, The adapted research method is that suggest models for assessment impact of risk and predict the contingency considering risk. Based on the proposed models, It is selected one modular plant construction project and assessment impact of risk factors and predicted the contingency. The results of this study are as follows: Assessment the probability of occurrence of risk factors and intensity of impact, and extract 15 important risk factors. These are classified as Engineering, Procurement, Fabrication, Transportation, Construction phases to consider the work characteristics of the modular plant. The predicted contingency is that 6.739%(Engineering 2.850%, Procurement 6.225%, Fabrication 6.211%, Transportation 4.165%, Construction 8.168%) to prepare the basic business expense. The model is used as a way to derive quantitative results in the decision-making process for risk management in construction projects.

본 연구의 목적은 플랜트 건설사업에서 모듈러 공법의 적용이 확대됨에 따라 모듈러 플랜트에 대한 업무특성을 고려하여 위험을 평가하고 위험에 대응하기 위한 예비비를 예측하는 것이다. 연구방법은 모듈러 플랜트의 업무특성을 고려하여 위험의 영향을 평가하기 위한 모델(방법)과 예비비를 예측하기 위한 모델(방법)을 제시한다. 그리고 제시된 모델을 기반으로 모듈러 플랜트 건설사업 1곳을 사례로 선정하여 위험요인의 영향을 평가하고 예비비를 예측한다. 상기와 같은 목적과 방법에 따라 도출된 결과는 다음과 같다. 위험요인의 발생확률과 영향점수를 평가하여 중요 위험요인 15개를 선정하였다. 그리고 모듈러 플랜트의 특성을 고려하기 위하여 설계(E), 구매(P), 제작(F), 운송(T), 시공(C)단계로 업무를 분류하여 예측된 예비비는 기초사업비(610,503,596 천원) 대비 약 6.739%이며, 설계(E) 2.850%, 구매(P) 6.225%, 제작(F) 6.211%, 운송(T) 4.165%, 시공(C) 8.168%로 도출되었다. 본 모델은 위험관리를 위한 의사결정 과정에서 정량적인 결과를 도출하는 방법으로 활용된다.

Keywords

References

  1. AACE (2009). Cost Engineer's Notebook Vol. I&II(Estimation Contingency). American Association of Cost Engineering.
  2. California (2012). Project Risk Management Handbook. California Department of Transportation.
  3. Construction Industry Institute (CII). (2013). "SPC" 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings.
  4. CERIK (2000). The Necessity of Contingency Prediction System for Construction Projects. Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea.
  5. Exxon Mobil (2013). Project Tender Document.
  6. FTA (1994). Risk Assessment in Fixed Guide way Transit System Construction.
  7. Hwang, J., Choi, S., Lee, J., and Kim, Y. (2014). "Development of Bill Service Framework for Modular Housing Construction." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(5), pp. 138-146. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.5.138
  8. Kang, H. W. (2017). "Model of Risk Contingency Prediction Based on Risk Information in Construction Projects." Thesis of Ph.D The University of Chung-Ang.
  9. Kang, H. W., Won, Y. M., Kang, M. G., and Kim, Y. S. (2012). "An Analysis on the Probability Costs Variation Ranges of the Cost Items from the Risk Factor Model for Construction Phase of Overseas Gas Plant Projects." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 28(1), pp. 191-198.
  10. Kang, H. W., Kim, M. S., Kim, S. H., and Kim, Y. S. (2012). "A Study on the Analysis of Risk Factors in Engineering, Procurement and Construction Phase for Overseas Plant Project." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, AIK, 28(5), pp. 111-118.
  11. Kim, J. W. (2017). "Scenario-based Risk Factor and Risk Cost Analysis Model for Modular Plant Construction." Thesis of M.S. The University of Chung-Ang.
  12. Kim, S. G. (2015). "Risk Value Calculation Method for Moderate Risk Concentration Type at Qualitative Risk Analysis Phase." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 16(2), pp. 38-45. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.2.038
  13. Kim, S. G. (2007). "A Model of the Construction Risk Management System for Site Personnel in the Construction Project." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 8(2), pp. 90-98.
  14. Lee, H. C., Lee, G., Yeo, S. K., and Go, S. S. (2009). "A Study on the Risk Evaluation of Construction Management Based on Risk Identification." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(3), pp. 83-91.
  15. Lee, H. C., Shin, S. B., Hong, J. H., and Go, S. S. (2009). "A Study on the Risk Evaluation of Apartment Development Project based on VE." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 10(4), pp. 14-25.
  16. Murtaza, M. B., Fisher, D. J., and Skibniewski, M. J. (1993). "Knowledge-based approach to modular construction decision support." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 119(1), pp. 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:1(115)
  17. Park, K. J. (2012). "Introduction of Module Construction Method for Overseas Plant Projects." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 13(1), pp. 21-24.
  18. Park, C. Y., Kim. H. J., Won, J. W., Jang, W. S., and Han, S. H. (2016). "A Study for Selecting Modular Construction Method." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 17(4), pp. 12-19. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2016.17.4.012
  19. Rogan, A. L., Lawson, R. M., and Bates-Brkljac, N. (2000). "Value and benefits assessment of modular construction." The Steel Construction Institute, Ascot.
  20. Tatum, C. B., Vanegas, J. A., and Williams, J. M. (1987). "Construction Improvement using Prefabrication." Pre-assembly and Modularization, Technical Report 297, Austin: Construction Industry Institute.
  21. Texas (2010). Risk-Based Construction Cost Estimating Reference Guide. Texas Department of Transportation.