DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on English Grammar

  • Sung, Tae-Soo (Dept. of English Language and Cultural Studies, Namseoul University)
  • Received : 2018.08.10
  • Accepted : 2018.09.17
  • Published : 2018.09.28

Abstract

Using mobile technology in educational and learning environments has attracted a lot of attention in recent years. In this mobile environment, mobile phones have been used to enhance the effectiveness of education in the field, which has been recognized through numerous experimental studies so far. The study was proposed and conducted to find out how much the use of mobile phones can have to improve the grammatical knowledge of EFL students. Introduction of 95 intermediate courses to Chungnam area The second grade students of 4-year college participated in this study. Everyone in the experimental and control groups was given the opportunity to review and recur to use the six grammar formats, including the current complete tense, simple past tense, direct and indirect question sentences, and comparative and superative-based methods. During the class discussion, the participants of the group record their voice on their cell phones, analyze the mistakes in the expressions recorded as a task after the class, and explain the results in the next session. However, in the class of the control group participants, this recording process is omitted. Participants benefited from mobile learning were much more positive in multidimensional grammar tests than those in control groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Baleghizadeh, S. and Oladrostam, E. " The Effect of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on Grammatical Accuracy of EFL Students," The Internet and Technology in EFL/ESL. Vol. 34 No. 2. January, pp. 77-86. 2011.
  2. Chastain, K. "Developing second language skills: Theory and practice," (Third Edition). Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988.
  3. Chen, N. S.-W., Hsieh, & kinshuk. "Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning," Language Learning & Technology, Vol. 12-3, pp. 93-113, 2008.
  4. Chen, C.M.& S.-H. Hsu. "personalized Intelligent Mobile Learning System for Supporting Effective English Learning," Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 11-3, pp. 153-180, 2008.
  5. Colpaert, J. "From courseware to coursewear?", Computer Assisted Language Learning, Vol. 17, pp. 261-266. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000319575
  6. Foley, A. "A psycholinguistic framework for task-based approaches to language teaching," Applied Linguistics, Vol. 12, pp. 62-75, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.1.62
  7. Geddes, S.J. "Mobile learning in the 21st century: benefit to learners," 2004. http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition06/download/geddes.pdf
  8. Kennedy, C., & Levy, M. "L'italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners' language learning," ReCALL, Vol. 20-3, pp. 315-350, 2008.
  9. Kiernan, P.J. and Aizawa, K. "Cell phones in task based learning: Are cell phones useful languages learning tools?" ReCALL, Vol. 16, pp. 71-84, 2004.
  10. Kukulska-Hulme, A. and Shield, L. "An overview of mobile assisted language learning: from content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction," ReCALL, Vol. 20, pp. 271-289, 2008.
  11. Lu, M. "Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone," Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24, pp. 515-525. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x
  12. Mackey, A. "Interaction as practice," In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology, pp. 85-110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  13. Reynolds, M. "Classroom power: some dynamics of classroom task," In R. Clark, N. Fairclough, R. Ivanic, N. McLeod, J. Thomas, and P. Meara (Eds.), Language and power, pp. 122-136, Clevedon, Avon: BAAL and CILT, 1990.
  14. Roschelle J., Sharples M. & Chan T.W. "Introduction to the special issue on wireless and mobile technologies in education," Journal of Computer Assisted learning, Vol. 21, pp. 159-161, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00123.x
  15. Salaberry, M.R. "The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective." Modern Language Journal, Vol. 85, pp. 39-56. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00096
  16. Schieffelin B.B. and Ochs, E. "Language socialization," Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 15, pp. 163-191, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.001115
  17. Skehan, P. "Task-based instruction," Annual review of applied linguistics, Vol. 18, pp. 268-286, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003585
  18. Sung, T.-S., C.-W. Joo and K.-Y. Park. "Using Mobile Phones in EFL Classes," Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, Vol. 22-6, pp. 33-40, 2017. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2017.22.01.033
  19. Swain, M. Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H.G Widdowson (125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995.
  20. Warschauer, M. and Meskill, C. (2000). "Technology and second language teaching. In J. W. Rosenthall (Ed.), Handbook of undergraduate second language education" (pp. 303-318). NJ, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. 2000.
  21. Wuyungaowa. "Engaging EFL Learners through WeChat: A Mobile Phone-Based EFL Learning Project in China. International HETL Review," Vol. 5-5. 2015. https://www.hetl.org/engaging-efl-learners-through-wechat-a-mobile-phone-based-efl-learning-project-in-china
  22. Yousefzadeh, M. "Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) VS. Short Message Sending (SMS) and Second language learners' vocabulary," Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, Vol. 2-4. pp. 89-92. November 2012.