한국농공학회논문집 (Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)

  • 제60권5호
  • /
  • Pages.115-124
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-3692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7709(eISSN)
한국농공학회 (The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

회복탄력성을 고려한 기상 시나리오별 가뭄 용수 공급방안: 나주호를 중심으로

Water Supply Alternatives for Drought by Weather Scenarios Considering Resilience: Focusing on Naju Reservoir

  • Park, JinHyun (Project Planning Office, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) ;
  • Go, JeaHan (Farmland &Irrigation Development Office, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) ;
  • Jo, YoungJun (Chungnam Regional Headquarter, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) ;
  • Jung, KyungHun (Project Planning Office, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) ;
  • Sung, MuHong (Jeonnam Regional Headquarter, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) ;
  • Jung, HyoungMo (Water Resources Planning Office, Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC)) ;
  • Park, HyunKyu (Department of Rural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yoo, SeungHwan (Department of Rural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yoon, KwangSik (Department of Rural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.30
  • 심사 : 2018.08.29
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Resilience has been widely used in various fields including design and operation of infrastructures. The resilient infrastructures not only reduce the damage scale of various disasters but also reduce the time and cost required for restoration. However, resilience rarely applied to promote efficient management of agricultural infrastructures. Recently, drought is an aggravating disaster by climate change and need countermeasures. Therefore, we tried to demonstrate evaluating measures in case of drought under consideration of resilience. This study applied the robustness-cost index (RCI) to evaluate alternative solution of the supply problem of a large agricultural reservoir under drought conditions. Four structural alternatives were selected to estimate the robustness index (RI) and the cost index (CI) to obtain the RCI values. Structural alternatives are classified into temporary measures and permanent measures. Temporary measures include the development of a tube wells and the installation of the portable pump, while the permanent measures include the installation of a pumping stations and the pumping water to the reservoir (Yeongsan River-Naju reservoir). RCI values were higher in permanent measures than those of temporary measures. Initial storage of the reservoir also affected RCI values of the drought measures. Permanent measures installation and management of early stage of the reservoir storage shortage was identified as the most resilient system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., and von Winterfeldt, D., 2003. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra 19(4): 733-752. doi:10.1193/1.1623497
  2. Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16: 253-267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
  3. Garmezy, N. 1985. Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors. Recent Research in Developmental Psychopathology 4: 213-233.
  4. Gallopin, G. C., 2006. Linkages between vulnerability,resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global environmentalchange 16(3): 293-303. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
  5. Holling, C. S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
  6. Jung, J., Lee, C., An, J., Kim, J. and Choi, Y., 2016. Establishment of resilient infrastructures for the mitigation of an urban water problem: Robustness assessment of structural alternatives for the problem of water pollution. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 3: 182-188 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2016.3.3.182
  7. Kang, D., Kim, T. W., and Ahn, J. H., 2013. Water resources infrastructure: substantiality and resilience. Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 13(1): 309-315. doi:10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.1.309
  8. Kim, B. I., Shin, S. C., Kim, D. Y., 2014a. Resilience assessment of dam's flood-control service. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 34: 1919-1924 (in Korean). doi:10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.6.1919.
  9. Kim, H. S., Choi, J. Y., and Shin, E. H., 2014b. Economic analysis based on the type of green roof initiatives: the case of Jung-gu Seoul. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 30(10): 159-167 (in Korean). doi:10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.10.159
  10. Kim, T. H., Kim, H. J., and Lee, K. J., 2011. The concept and functional objectives of the urban resilience for disaster management. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 26: 65-70 (in Korean).
  11. Yoo, S. H., Choi, J. Y., Nam, W. H., Kim, T. G., Go, G. D., Developing Model of Drought Climate Scenarios for Agricultural Drought Mitigation. Jouranal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 54(2): 67-75 (in Korean). doi:10.5389/KSAE.2012.54.2.067
  12. Korean Rural Community Corporation (KRC), Rural infrastructures management system, https://www.alimi.or.kr/dataview/a/waterStatus/selectYsNationalAggregate.do; Retrieved on Dec 31 2017.
  13. Lee, E. S., Noh, C. W. and Sung, J. S., 2014. Meaning structure of green infrastructure a literature review about definitions. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42: 65-76 (in Korean). doi:10.9715/KILA.2014.42.2.065
  14. Lee, C., Jung, J., An, J., Kim, J. and Choi, Y., 2016. Establishment of resilient infrastructures for the mitigation of an urban water problem: 1.Robustness assessment of structural alternatives for the problem of urban floods. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 3: 117-125 (in Korean). doi:10.17820/eri.2016.3.2.117.
  15. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2017. Drought countermeasures price table (in Korean).
  16. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2016. Statistical yearbook of land and water development for agriculture (in Korean).
  17. National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC), 2009. Critical Infrastructure Resilience. http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/as-sets/niac/niac_critical_infrastructure_resilience. pdf; Retrieved on Dec 1 2015.
  18. Rutter, M., 1987. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 57: 316-331. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x
  19. Rose, A., 2007. Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environmental Hazards 7: 383-398. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001
  20. Shin, S. J., Jung, D. Y. and Hwang, E. H., 2009. Concept analysis of resilience in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 39: 788-795. doi:10.4040/jkan.2009.39.6.788
  21. The Bank of Korea, Economic statistics system (ECOS), http://ecos.bok.or.kr; Retrieved on Dec 31 2017.
  22. Vugrin, E. D. and Camphouse, R. C., 2011. Infrastructure resilience assessment through control design. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures 7: 243-260. doi:10.1504/IJCIS.2011.042994
  23. Vugrin, E. D., Warren, D. E., Ehlen, M. A. and Camphouse, R. C., 2010. A framework for assessing the resilience of infrastructure and economic systems. In, Gopalakrishnan, K. and Peeta, S. (eds.), Sustainable and Resilient Critical Infrastructure Systems, Springer-Verlan, Berlin, Germany. 77-116. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11405-2_3
  24. Woo, H. S., 2011. Prevention of urban flood due to climate change. Journal of Civil Engineering 59: 5-7 (in Korean).
  25. Yu, S. Y., Kim, S. W., Park, K. H., Oh, C. W., Park, D. K. and Kim, C. Y., 2012. Quantitative resilience analysis of Fiji to cyclones. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 12: 55-63 (in Korean). doi:10.9798/KOSHAM.2012.12.2.055