Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry

  • Volume 68
  • /
  • Pages.372-379
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-086X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1876-794X(eISSN)
The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry (한국공업화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhanced performance at an early state of hydrocarbon selective catalyst reduction of NOx by atmospheric pressure plasma

  • Nguyen, Duc Ba (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Jeju National University) ;
  • Heo, Il Jeong (Environment & Sustainable Resources Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Mok, Young Sun (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2018.06.13
  • Accepted : 2018.08.21
  • Published : 2018.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The improvement of $NO_x$ reduction by $Ag/{\gamma}-Al_2O_3$ with a hydrocarbon ($n-C_7H_6$) in the early state was investigated in a packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge plasma reactor. The results revealed that the combination of plasma with the catalyst enhanced $NO_x$ reduction efficiency at low operating temperatures, depending on the temperature and specific input energy. To sum up, the poor performance of the catalytic $NO_x$ reduction at low temperatures in the early stage before reaching thermochemical steady state can be greatly compensated for by using the atmospheric-pressure plasma generated in the catalyst bed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation

References

  1. M.Z. Jacobson, Air Pollution and Global Warming: History, Science, and Solutions, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  2. S. Jafarmadar, in: S. Bari (Ed.), The Effect of Split Injection on the Combustion and Emissions in DI and IDI Diesel Engines, InTech, Rijeka, 2013.
  3. B. Pereda-Ayo, J.R. Gonzalez-Velasco, in: S. Bari (Ed.), $NO_x$ Storage and Reduction for Diesel Engine Exhaust after Treatment, InTech, Rijeka, 2013.
  4. F. Gao, X. Tang, H. Yi, S. Zhao, C. Li, J. Li, Y. Shi, X. Meng, Catalysts 7 (2017).
  5. J. Wang, H. Zhao, G. Haller, Y. Li, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 202 (2017) 346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.024
  6. J. Tan, Y. Wei, Y. Sun, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, W. Song, J. Li, X. Zhang, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 63 (2018) 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.002
  7. X.-l. Long, B.-b. Duan, H.-x. Cao, M.-l. Jia, L.-a. Wu, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 62 (2018) 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.060
  8. Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Song, P. Ning, H. Li, X. Liu, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 34 (2016) 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.11.006
  9. Y. Liang, M. Zhao, J. Wang, M. Sun, S. Li, Y. Huang, L. Zhong, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 54 (2017) 359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.016
  10. M.A. Goula, N.D. Charisiou, K.N. Papageridis, A. Delimitis, E. Papista, E. Pachatouridou, E.F. Iliopoulou, G. Marnellos, M. Konsolakis, I.V. Yentekakis, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 4 (2016) 1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.02.025
  11. L. Xu, S. Niu, D. Wang, C. Lu, Q. Zhang, K. Zhang, J. Li, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 63 (2018) 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.039
  12. Y. Jung, Y.J. Shin, Y.D. Pyo, C.P. Cho, J. Jang, G. Kim, Chem. Eng. J. 326 (2017) 853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.020
  13. H. Pan, Y. Guo, H.T. Bi, Chem. Eng. J. 280 (2015) 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.093
  14. T. Chaieb, C. Thomas, S. Casale, C. Louis, L. Delannoy, Catal. Lett. 148 (2018) 539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-017-2276-1
  15. E. Yuan, K. Zhang, G. Lu, Z. Mo, Z. Tang, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 42 (2016) 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.030
  16. G. Sui, Z. Xue, D. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y. Shen, Y. Zong, Y. Liu, T. Qiu, S. Zhu, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 51 (2017) 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.006
  17. V.S. Prasad, P. Aghalayam, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56 (2017) 11705. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02058
  18. A.M. Beale, F. Gao, I. Lezcano-Gonzalez, C.H.F. Peden, J. Szanyi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 7371. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00108K
  19. L. Castoldi, E. Aneggi, R. Matarrese, R. Bonzi, J. Llorca, A. Trovarelli, L. Lietti, Catal. Today 258 (2015) 405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.02.024
  20. A. Mihaylova, A. Naydenov, D. Kovacheva, E. Ivanova, D. Stoyanova, P. Stefanov, Catal. Commun. 10 (2009) 1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2009.02.009
  21. F. Gunnarsson, J.A. Pihl, T.J. Toops, M. Skoglundh, H. Harelind, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 202 (2017) 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.009
  22. J.O. Jo, Q.H. Trinh, S.H. Kim, Y.S. Mok, Catal. Today 310 (2018) 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.05.028
  23. J.B. Lee, H.-C. Kang, O.J. Jo, S.Y. Mok, Catalysts 7 (2017).
  24. T.H. Ihm, J.O. Jo, Y.J. Hyun, Y.S. Mok, Appl. Chem. Eng. 27 (2016) 92. https://doi.org/10.14478/ace.2015.1130
  25. J.O. Jo, Y.S. Mok, Appl. Chem. Eng. 29 (2018) 103.
  26. M. Koebel, G. Madia, M. Elsener, Catal. Today 73 (2002) 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00006-8
  27. C. Ciardelli, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, D. Chatterjee, B. Bandl-Konrad, Chem. Commun. (2004) 2718.
  28. M. Iwasaki, H. Shinjoh, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 390 (2010) 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.09.034
  29. L. Zhang, X.-l. Sha, L. Zhang, H.-b. He, Z.-h. Ma, L.-w. Wang, Y.-x. Wang, L.-x. She, AIP Adv. 6 (2016)075015. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959813
  30. Y. Li, Y. Li, P. Wang, W. Hu, S. Zhang, Q. Shi, S. Zhan, Chem. Eng. J. 330 (2017) 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.018
  31. Y. Xue, W. Sun, Q. Wang, L. Cao, J. Yang, Chem. Eng. J. 335 (2018) 612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.011
  32. X. Wang, J. Cheng, X. Wang, Y. Shi, F. Chen, X. Jing, F. Wang, Y. Ma, L. Wang, P. Ning, Chem. Eng. J. 333 (2018) 402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.127
  33. X. Zhou, X. Huang, A. Xie, S. Luo, C. Yao, X. Li, S. Zuo, Chem. Eng. J. 326 (2017) 1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.015
  34. C. Yu, B. Huang, L. Dong, F. Chen, Y. Yang, Y. Fan, Y. Yang, X. Liu, X. Wang, Chem. Eng. J. 316 (2017) 1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.024
  35. C. Xu, W. Sun, L. Cao, T. Li, X. Cai, J. Yang, Chem. Eng. J. 308 (2017) 980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.119
  36. A. Xie, X. Zhou, X. Huang, L. Ji, W. Zhou, S. Luo, C. Yao, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 49 (2017) 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.01.034
  37. A.M. Abu-Jrai, J.A. Yamin, K.A. Ibrahim, O.A. Al-Khashman, M.A. Al-Shaweesh, M.A. Hararah, U. Rashid, M. Ahmad, G.M. Walker, A.a.H. Al-Muhtaseb, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 (2014) 1650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.012
  38. Q.H. Trinh, S.H. Kim, Y.S. Mok, Chem. Eng. J. 302 (2016) 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.030
  39. U. Kogelschatz, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 23 (2003) 1. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022470901385
  40. D.B. Nguyen, W.G. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 57 (2018) 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.08.039
  41. Q.H. Trinh, Y.S. Mok, Korean J. Chem. Eng. 33 (2016) 735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0300-y
  42. G. Froment, K. Bischoff, J. De Wilde, Chemical Reactor Analysis and Design, third ed., Wiley, New York, 2010.
  43. D.B. Nguyen, W.G. Lee, Chem. Eng. J. 294 (2016) 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.061
  44. D.B. Nguyen, W.G. Lee, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 26505. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA01485B
  45. D.B. Nguyen, W.G. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 52 (2017) 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.03.033
  46. D.B. Nguyen, W.G. Lee, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 32 (2015) 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.08.016

Cited by

  1. Optimizing Washcoating Conditions for the Preparation of Zeolite-Based Cordierite Monoliths for NOx CH4-SCR: A Required Step for Real Application vol.58, pp.27, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01216
  2. Plasma-Assisted Selective Catalytic Reduction for Low-Temperature Removal of NOx and Soot Simulant vol.9, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9100853
  3. Removal of dilute ethylene using repetitive cycles of adsorption and plasma-catalytic oxidation over Pd/ZSM-5 catalyst vol.53, pp.33, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab79d9
  4. Atmospheric Pressure Plasma for Diesel Particulate Matter Treatment: A Review vol.11, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11010029
  5. High-Throughput NOx Removal by Two-Stage Plasma Honeycomb Monolith Catalyst vol.55, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00750