DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

묵가적(墨家的) 입장에서 바라본 기업의 사회적 책임과 역할

Mozi's View on Social Responsibility of Corporation

  • 서용모 (유원대학교 교양융합학부) ;
  • 김하윤 (배재대학교 주시경교양대학)
  • Seo, Yong-Mo (Dept. of Humanities and Social Science, U1 University) ;
  • Kim, Ha-Yun (Dept. of Division Arts Education, Paichai University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.20
  • 심사 : 2018.09.20
  • 발행 : 2018.09.28

초록

본 연구의 목적은 최근 화두로 대두되고 있는 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 내용을 고대 중국의 철학자인 묵자의 사상에서 살펴본 것이다. 또한 글로벌한 기업환경 속에서 기업이 지닌 핵심 속성을 기존의 접근방식과는 다른 시각으로 살펴보고자 하였다. 현대사회에서 기업이 추구하는 이(利)에 대한 개념은 다층적 점진적으로 진화해가고 있다. 기업이 고속성장을 이루어내는 만큼 기업이 추구하는 가치의 실현도 중요하게 논의되고 있다. 급격하게 변하는 경영환경 속에서 기업의 가치추구를 지나치게 자신의 입장에서만 추구하다 보니 기업 활동에 대한 인식이 부정적으로 비춰질 수밖에 없다. 그러다 보니 기존의 기업 활동의 방식을 탈피하고 새로운 경영철학으로서의 철학을 요구하게 된 것이다. 그리고 기업의 사회적 책임이라는 방식으로 사회 구성원들과 함께 살아가고자 전략을 전환하고 있다. 이러한 기업의 경영 전략을 고대 중국의 철학자 묵자(墨子)의 핵심사상인 겸애(兼愛)를 중심으로 접근하였다. 묵자가 언급한 겸애는 철학적 사상의 박애나 다른 유사한 개념들보다 심층적 사상을 내포하고 있다. 겸애는 단순히 행위나 도덕원리로서의 결과론적 접근이 아니라 서로 사랑하고자하는 내적 동기(겸상애(兼相愛))와 서로의 이익을 공유할 수 있는 원리(교상리(交相利))를 포함하고 있는 것이다. 이처럼 기업이 지속가능한 가치를 추구하기 위해서는 기존의 절대적 가치를 추구하기 위한 방식을 재고해보고, 묵자의 겸애사상을 기반으로 한 철학적 전략을 수립할 것을 제언하고자 하였다.

This study interprets the corporate social responsibility and its management through analysis of philosophical view of Mozi(墨子). Mozi was a chinese philosopher during the Hundred Schools of Thought period. He advocated Universal love(兼愛), which stresses that people should care for everyone equally. This principle is in accord with the sustainable management strategy for global market environments. The realization of the value that the company pursues in the rapid growth of such enterprises is an important issue. The pursuit of corporate value in its own interest under the rapidly changing business environment is perceived very negative. And it has demanded a different philosophy as a new management philosophy. The philosophical strategies of these companies were centered around the core philosophy of the ancient Chinese philosopher, Mozi. It is not merely an outcome approach as the act or moral principle but the inner motive to love each other and the principle of sharing the profits of each other. In order to pursue the sustainable value of the enterprise, We would like to suggest a way to pursue the existing absolute value, and to suggest a philosophical strategy based on the philosophy of Mozi.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. H. Lee. (2009). (The) impact of CSR on organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in franchise industry : mediating roles of organizational trust and job satisfaction, Sejong University Doctor Thesis.
  2. H. R. Bowen. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman. New York: Harper and Row.
  3. Eells, R. & Walton, C. (1961). Conceptual Foundations of Business. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin Inc.
  4. McGuire W. J., Papageorgis D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 62, 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042026
  5. Keith Davis & Robert L. (1971). Blomstrom, Business, society, and environment, McGraw-Hill - New York.
  6. Carroll, A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance." The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  7. E. J. Petkus & R. B. Woodruff. (1992). A model of the socially responsible decision-making process in marketing association. In: Chris TA et al (ed.), American Marketing Association, Chicago.
  8. Tom J. Brown & Peter A. Dacin. (1997). The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses, Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84 https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100205
  9. Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa, Thomas R. Shaw, D. Sandy Staples. (2004). Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams., Information Systems Research, 15(3), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0028
  10. C. Windsor. (2001). The Corporate Social Responsibility, International Journal of Organization Analysis, 9(3), 225-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028934
  11. S. T. Kim. (2010). (A) study on the development of a CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility) evaluation model. Kyung-Hee University Doctor Thesi.
  12. Y. J, Jeon. (1996). (The) influence of the CSR types and themes of the corporate communication on corporate reputation and social connectedness. Hong-Ik University Doctor Thesis.
  13. K. E. Kim. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Economic Education - Focusing on John Rawls' Theory of Justice-", Journal of Leaner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(7), .45-64.
  14. 祝瑞開, 先泰社會和諸子思想新探, 中國: 福建人民出版社, 1981.
  15. S. C. Ki. (2009). Mozi, Seoul: buybooks.
  16. H. A. Jee. (2016). Multicultural Human Rights Education Implied in Mozi's Universal Love, Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 42, 51-69. https://doi.org/10.18850/JEES.2016.42.03
  17. S. K. Hwang. (2014). Chinese Philosophy : Exploring Mozi's "General Love" thought to develop the adolescent morality lists of personality education, Journal of Korean philosophical history, 10, 225-246.
  18. H. S. Lee. (1991). Study on the essence of Mozi's Universal Love Philosophy, Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 3, 217-250.
  19. T. S. Lee & M. H. Yun. (2017). Mohist's Idea of YiLi and Jianai, The Society of the Eastern Classic, 67, 298-326..
  20. B. D. Chun. (2010). Theoretical Basis and Limitation of Mo tzu's Antiwar Theory, The Journal of humanities, 17, 141-172.
  21. J. S. Lee. (2012). A Basic Viewpoints of Mozi's War Criticism, The Journal of Humanities Studies, 87.
  22. H. C. Shin. (1996). A Study on the Communicatarian View of Self and Societ. Korea National University of Education master Thesis.
  23. Michael E. Poter, Mark R. Kramer. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review.
  24. Y. M . Seo. (2012). The Realization of Shared value and Mozi's Universal Love. Establishment of China 20 years Commemoration International Conference, Beijing China : Chinese Mozi Society.