Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigating the Impacts of the Quality of Project Management Information System on Project Performance and User Satisfaction

프로젝트 관리 정보시스템 품질이 프로젝트 성과와 사용자 만족도에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2018.08.06
  • Accepted : 2018.09.18
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The use of Project Management Information System (PMIS) is increasing in project management industries such as construction, defense, manufacturing, software development, telecommunication, etc. It is generally known that PMIS helps to improve the quality of decision making in project management, and consequently improves the project performance. However, how much and which parts of project management performance are affected by PMIS still need to be studied further. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of PMIS quality on project management performance. We collected data from various project based industries such as construction, defense, manufacturing, software development and telecommunication by using survey questionnaire. PMIS quality was measured in three dimensions. They are system quality, information quality and service quality. Project management performance was measured in nine variables such as time reduction, work accuracy, cost management, etc. Statistical analyses such as multiple regression were used to analyze the data. The results showed that PMIS quality had significant impacts on the project management performance and user satisfaction. It was notable that only two dimensions out of the three PMIS quality dimensions, system quality and information quality, affected the project management performance. Also, it was found that PM performance played a mediating role between PMIS and user satisfaction, and between PMIS and reuse intention. The contribution of this research is that it helps to clarify what aspects of PMIS affect the project management performance and user satisfaction.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, A.S.B., Anbari, F.T., and Money, W.H., Impact of organization and project factors on acceptance and usage of project management software and perceived project success, Project Management Journal, 2008, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 18-29.
  2. Baccarini, D., The logical framework method for defining project success, Project Management Journal, 1999, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697289903000405
  3. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, Vol. 51, pp. 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  4. Braglia, M. and Frosolini, M., An integrated approach to implement Project Management Information Systems within the Extended Enterprise, International Journal of Project Management, 2014, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.003
  5. Caniels, M.C.J. and Bakens, R.J.J.M., The effects of Project Management Information Systems on decision making in a multi project environment, International Journal of Project Management, 2012, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.05.005
  6. Cooke-Davies, T., The Real Success Factors on Projects, International Journal of Project Management, 2002, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9
  7. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R., Information systems success : the quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research, 1992, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  8. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R., The DeLone and McLean model of Information systems success : a tenyear update, Journal of Management Information System, 2003, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  9. Froese, T.M., The impact of emerging information technology on project management for construction, Automation in Construction, 2010, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2009.11.004
  10. Goodman, L.A., On the exact variance of products, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1960, Vol. 55, pp. 708-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1960.10483369
  11. Jaafari, A. and Manivong, K., Towards a smart project management information system, International Journal of Project Management, 1998, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00037-9
  12. Kim, M.J., Jung, T.W., Noh, G.T., and Koo, K.J., Prototype Structure of Integrated Document Forms for Construction PMIS Based on Analysis, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2011, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.5.3
  13. Kim, Y.S., Yoon, J.H., Jin, S.Y., and Yoon, S.W., A Survey of the Satisfaction Level of Construction Information System from Users' Viewpoints on Construction Site, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2006, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 126-136.
  14. Lee, S.K. and Yu, J.H., Assessment of ASP-PMIS Quality in Korea, KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 9-17. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2011.1.3.009
  15. Lee, S.K. and Yu, J.H., Critical Success Factors for Project Management Information System in Construction, KICEM Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 2011, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-30. https://doi.org/10.6106/JCEPM.2011.1.1.025
  16. Lee, S.K. and Yu, J.H., Success model of project management information system in construction, Automation in Construction, 2012, Vol. 25, pp. 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.04.015
  17. Lee, S.K., Lee, H.L., and Yu, J.H., The Effect of PMIS Quality on Project Management Success, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2010, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 117-126. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.12.6.117
  18. Liberatore, M.J. and Pollack-Johnson, B., Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software, IEEE Transactions Engineering Management, 2003, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 164-74. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.810821
  19. Light, M., Rosser, B., and Hayward, S., Realizing the benefits of projects and portfolio management, Gartner, Research ID G00125673, 42005, pp. 1-31.
  20. Love, P.E.D. and Irani, Z., A project management quality cost information system for the construction industry, Information & Management, 2003, Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00094-0
  21. Na, K.T. and Kang, B.H., The Establishment of an Activity-Based EVM-PMIS Integration Model, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2010, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 199-212. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2010.10.1.199
  22. Parasuraman, A., Ziethaml, V., and Berry, L.L., SERVQUAL : A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, 1988, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 12-40.
  23. Park, K.M., Im, C.W., Kim, C.D., and Jeong, H.S., The Development of Next Generation Smart PMIS System, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2013, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 117-130. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2013.14.2.117
  24. Petter, S., Delone, W., and McLean, E., Measuring information systems success : models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationship, European Journal of Information Systems, 2008, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 236-263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15
  25. Petter, S., Delone, W., and McLean, E.R., Information Systems Success : The Quest for the Independent Variables, Journal of Management Information Systems, 2013, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 7-62. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290401
  26. Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th ed., Newtown Square PA, 2013.
  27. Raymond, L. and Bergeron, F., Project management information systems : An empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success, International Journal of Project Management, 2008, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.002
  28. Sobel, M.E., Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models, Sociological Methodology, 1982, Vol. 13, pp. 290-312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
  29. Song, I.K., Hur, Y.R., and Seo, J.W., Development of intranet-based Program Management Information System of multi-complex project with application of BIM, Journal of KIBIM, 2012, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 27-39.
  30. Stewart, R.A., IT enhanced project information management in construction : Pathways to improved performance and strategic competitiveness, Automation in Construction, 2007, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 511-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.09.001
  31. Sung, M.W., Kim, K.R., Lee, S.K., and Yu, J.H., Effect of PMIS Quality on Intention to Use and User Satisfaction, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2012, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 122-132. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2012.12.1.122
  32. Yeom, J.W., Kim, D.W., Ahn, B.J., Kim, J.H., and Kim, J.J., Development of Program Management Information System Prototype to Support Urban Regeneration Based on System Requirement Analysis, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 2009, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 85-92. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2009.9.4.085
  33. Yoon, J.H. and Moon, Y.I., The Study of Project Management Information System Establishment for Construction, Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2002, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 132-138.
  34. Zviran, M. and Erlich, Z., Measuring IS user satisfaction : review and implications, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2003, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 81-103.