Journal of Power Electronics

The Korean Institute of Power Electronics (전력전자학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SynRM Servo-Drive CVT Systems Using MRRHPNN Control with Mend ACO

  • Ting, Jung-Chu (Dept. of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education) ;
  • Chen, Der-Fa (Dept. of Industrial Education and Technology, National Changhua University of Education)
  • Received : 2017.10.15
  • Accepted : 2018.05.11
  • Published : 2018.09.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Compared with classical linear controllers, a nonlinear controller can result in better control performance for the nonlinear uncertainties of continuously variable transmission (CVT) systems that are driven by a synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM). Improved control performance can be seen in the nonlinear uncertainties behavior of CVT systems by using the proposed mingled revised recurrent Hermite polynomial neural network (MRRHPNN) control with mend ant colony optimization (ACO). The MRRHPNN control with mend ACO can carry out the overlooker control system, reformed recurrent Hermite polynomial neural network (RRHPNN) control with an adaptive law, and reimbursed control with an appraised law. Additionally, in accordance with the Lyapunov stability theorem, the adaptive law in the RRHPNN and the appraised law of the reimbursed control are established. Furthermore, to help improve convergence and to obtain better learning performance, the mend ACO is utilized for adjusting the two varied learning rates of the two parameters in the RRHPNN. Finally, comparative examples are illustrated by experimental results to confirm that the proposed control system can achieve better control performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. H. Kim and J. H. Lee, "Optimum design criteria of an ALA-SynRM for the maximum torque density and power factor improvement," Int. J. Applied Electromagn. Mech., Vol. 53, No. S2, pp. S279-S288, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-140170
  2. W. Chai, W. Zhao, and B. Kwon, "Optimal design of wound field synchronous reluctance machines to improve torque by increasing the saliency ratio," IEEE Trans. Magn., Vol. 53, No. 11, Nov. 2017.
  3. R. E. Betz, R. Lagerquist, M. Jovanovic, T. J. E. Miller, and R. H. Middleton, “Control of synchronous reluctance machines,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 1110-1122, Nov./Dec. 1993. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.259721
  4. K. Uezato, T. Senjyu, and Y. Tomori, “Modeling and vector control of synchronous reluctance motors including Stator Iron Loss,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 971-976, July/Aug. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.297914
  5. T. Matsuo, A. E. Antably, and T. A. Lipo, “A new control strategy for optimum-efficiency operation of a synchronous reluctance Motor,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 1146-1153, Sep./Oct. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.633790
  6. E. M. Rashad, T. S. Radwan, and M. A. Rahman, "A maximum torque per ampere vector control strategy for synchronous reluctance motors considering saturation and iron losses," IEEE Industry Applications Conference, pp. 2411-2417, 2004.
  7. C. Y. Tseng, Y. F. Lue, Y. T. Lin, J. C. Siao, C.H. Tsai, and L. M. Fu, "Dynamic simulation model for hybrid electric scooters," IEEE Int. Symp. Industrial Electronics, pp. 1464-1469, 2009.
  8. L. Guzzella and A. M. Schmid, “Feedback linearization of spark-ignitionengines with continuously variable transmissions,” IEEE Trans. Contr. Syst. Technol., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 54-58, Feb. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1109/87.370710
  9. W. Kim and G. Vachtsevanos, "Fuzzy logic ratio control for a CVThydraulic module," Proc. of the IEEE Symp. Intelligent Control, pp. 151-156, 2000.
  10. G. Carbone, L. Mangialardi, B. Bonsen, C. Tursi, and P. A. Veenhuizen, “CVT dynamics: Theory and experiments,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 409-428, Apr. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2006.04.012
  11. M. N. Eskander, "Minimization of losses in permanent magnet synchronous motors using neural network," J. Power Electron., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp 220-229, Jul. 2002.
  12. A. F. Payam, M. N. Hashemnia and J. Faiz, “Robust DTC control of doubly-fed induction machines based on input-output feedback linearization using recurrent neural networks,” J. Power Electron., Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 719-725, Sep. 2011. https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2011.11.5.719
  13. C. H. Lin, "A PMSM driven electric scooter system with V-belt continuously variable transmission using novel hybrid modified recurrent Legendre neural network control," J. Power Electron., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp 220-229, Jan. 2015.
  14. C. H. Lin, “A backstepping control of LSM drive systems using adaptive modified recurrent Laguerre OPNNUO,” J. Power Electron., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 598-609, Mar. 2016. https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2016.16.2.598
  15. C. H. Lin, “Dynamic control of V-belt continuously variable transmission-driven electric scooter using hybrid modified recurrent Legendre neural network control system,” Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 787-808, Jan. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1703-8
  16. C. H. Lin, “Comparative dynamic control for continuously variable transmission with nonlinear uncertainty using blend amend recurrent Gegenbauer-functional-expansions neural network,” Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 1467-1493, Feb. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-016-3128-z
  17. M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni, "The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, and Cybernetics-Part B, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 29-41, Feb.1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.484436
  18. M. Dorigo and L. Gambardella, “Ant colony system: A cooperative learning approach to the traveling salesman problem,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 53-66, Apr. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585892
  19. G. D. Caro and M. Dorigo, "AntNet: A mobile agents approach to adaptive routing," Technical Report, IRIDIA-Free Brussels University, Belgium, 1997.
  20. W. J. Gutjahr. "A graph-based ant system and its convergence," Future Gener. Comput. Syst., Vol. 16, No. 8, pp.873-888, Jun. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(00)00044-3
  21. M. Dorigo and T. Stutzle. Ant Colony Optimization, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2004.
  22. M. Dorigo and C. Blum, “Ant colony optimization theory: A survey,” Theoretical Comput. Sci., Vol. 344, No. 2-3, pp. 243-278, Nov. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2005.05.020
  23. R. Gan, Q. Guo, H. Chang, and Y. Yi, “Improved ant colony optimization algorithm for the traveling salesman problems,” J. Syst. Eng. Electron., Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 329-333, April 2010. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-4132.2010.02.025
  24. J. Yang and Y. Zhuang, “An improved ant colony optimization algorithm for solving a complex combinatorial optimization problem,” Applied Soft Comput., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 653-660, Mar. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.040
  25. H. Idris, A. E. Ezugwu, S. B. Junaidu, and A. O. Adewumi, "An improved ant colony optimization algorithm with fault tolerance for job scheduling in grid computing systems," Plos One, Vol. 12, No. 5, e0177567, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177567
  26. K. J. Astrom and T. Hagglund, PID Controller: Theory, Design, and Tuning, Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, 1995.
  27. T. Hagglund and K. J. Astrom, “Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control,” Asian J. Contr., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 364-380, 2002.
  28. T. Hagglund and K. J. Astrom, “Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols tuning rules for PI control-part II: the frequency response method,” Asian J. Contr., Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 469-482, 2004.
  29. L. Ma and K. Khorasani, “Constructive feedforward neural networks using Hermite polynomial activation functions,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 821-833, Jul. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.851786
  30. L. Ma and K. Khorasani, "Adaptive constructive neural networks using Hermite polynomials for image compression," 2nd International Symposium on Neural Networks, pp. 713-722, 2005.
  31. G. G. Rigatos and S. G. Tzafestas, "Feed-forward neural networks using Hermite polynomial activation functions," 4th Helenic Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence, SETN 2006, pp. 323-333, 2006.
  32. S. M. Siniscalchi, J. Li, and C. H. Lee, “Hermitian polynomial for speaker adaptation of connectionist speech recognition systems,” IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, Language Process., Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 2152-2161, Oct. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2013.2270370
  33. J. J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied Nonlinear Control, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersay, 1991.
  34. K. J. Astrom and B. Wittenmark, Adaptive Control, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1995.
  35. F. L. Lewis, J. Campos, and R. Selmic, Neuro-Fuzzy Control of Industrial Systems with Actuator Nonlinearities. SIAM Frontiers in Applied Mathematics, 2002.