DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic protection of the benchmark highway bridge with passive hybrid control system

  • Received : 2017.03.20
  • Accepted : 2018.05.22
  • Published : 2018.09.25

Abstract

The present paper deals with the optimum performance of the passive hybrid control system for the benchmark highway bridge under the six earthquakes ground motion. The investigation is carried out on a simplified finite element model of the 91/5 highway overcrossing located in Southern California. A viscous fluid damper (known as VFD) or non-linear fluid viscous spring damper has been used as a passive supplement device associated with polynomial friction pendulum isolator (known as PFPI) to form a passive hybrid control system. A parametric study is considered to find out the optimum parameters of the PFPI system for the optimal response of the bridge. The effect of the velocity exponent of the VFD and non-linear FV spring damper on the response of the bridge is carried out by considering different values of velocity exponent. Further, the influences of damping coefficient and vibration period of the dampers are also examined on the response of the bridge. To study the effectiveness of the passive hybrid system on the response of the isolated bridge, it is compared with the corresponding PFPI isolated bridges. The investigation showed that passive supplement damper such as VFD or non-linear FV spring damper associated with PFPI system is significantly reducing the seismic response of the benchmark highway bridge. Further, it is also observed that non-linear FV spring damper hybrid system is a more promising strategy in reducing the response of the bridge compared to the VFD associated hybrid system.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdel Raheem, S.E. and Hayashikawa, T. (2013), "Energy dissipation system for earthquake protection of cable-stayed bridge towers", Earthq. Struct., 5(6), 657-678. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.6.657
  2. Agrawal, A., Tan, P., Nagarajaiah, S. and Zhang, J. (2009), "Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited highway bridge-Part I: Phase I problem definition", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 16, 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.301
  3. Agrawal, A.K. et al. (2005), "Benchmark structural control problem for a seismically excited bridge, Part I; Problem definition", http://wwwce.emgr.ccny.cuny.edu/people/Agrawal.
  4. Amiri, G.G., Shakouri, A., Veismoradi, S. and Namiranian, P. (2017), "Effect of seismic pounding on building isolated by triple friction pendulum bearing", Earthq. Struct., 12(1), 35-45 https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.12.1.035
  5. Chen, B., Sun, Y.Z., Li, Y.L. and Zhao, S.L. (2014), "Control of seismic response of a building frame by using hybrid system with Magneto rheological dampers and isolators", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(8), 1199-1215. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.8.1199
  6. Dicleli, M. (2007), "Supplemental elastic stiffness to reduce isolator displacements for seismic-isolated bridges in near-fault zones", Eng. Struct., 29, 763-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.013
  7. Geng, F., Ding, Y., Song, J., Li, W. and Li, A. (2014), "Passive control system for seismic protection of a multi-tower cablestayed bridge", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 495-514. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.495
  8. Hall, J.F., Heaton, T.H., Halling, M.W. and Wald, D.J. (1995), "Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 11, 569-605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828
  9. He, W.L. and Agrawal, A.K. (2007), "Passive and hybrid control systems for seismic protection of benchmark cable-stayed bridge", Struct. Control Hlth. Monit., 14, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.81
  10. Heaton, T.H., Hall, J.F., Wald, D.J. and Halling, M.W. (1995), "Response of high-rise and base-isolated buildings to a hypothetical MW7.0 blind thrust earthquake", Sci., 267, 206-211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.267.5195.206
  11. Jangid, R.S. (2004), "Seismic response of isolated bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 9(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:2(156)
  12. Kataria, N.P. and Jangid, R.S. (2016), "Seismic protection of the horizontally curved bridge with semi-active variable stiffness damper and isolation system", Adv. Struct. Eng., 19(7), 1103-1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216634477
  13. Lu, L.Y., Lee, T.Y., Juang, S.Y. and Yeh, S.W. (2013), "Polynomial Friction Pendulum Isolators (PFPIs) for building floor isolation: An experimental and theoretical study", Eng. Struct., 56, 970-982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.016
  14. Markou, A.A., Oliveto, G. and Athanasiou, A. (2016), "Response simulation of hybrid simulation systems under earthquake excitation", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 84, 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.003
  15. Matsagar, V.A. and Jangid, R.S. (2008), "Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of structures", Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 13(4), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:4(175)
  16. Mishra, S.K., Gur, S., Roy, K. and Chakraborty, S. (2015), "Response of bridges isolated by shape memory-alloy rubber bearing", J. Bridge Eng., 21(2), 04015071.
  17. Nakata, S., Hanai, T., Kiriyama, S.I. and Fukuwa, N. (2004), "Comparison of seismic performance of base-isolated house with various devices", J. Struct. Eng. B, 50B, 561-574.
  18. Park, K.S., Jung, H.J., Spencer, B.F. and Lee, I.W. (2003), "Hybrid control systems for seismic protection of a phase II benchmark cable-stayed bridge", J. Struct. Control, 10, 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.27
  19. Saha, A., Saha, P. and Patro, S.K. (2015), "Seismic response control of benchmark highway bridge using non-linear FV spring damper", IES J. Past A: Civil Struct. Eng., 8(4), 240-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/19373260.2015.1067929
  20. Shakib, H. and Fuladgar, A. (2003), "Response to pure-friction sliding structures to three component earthquake excitation", Comput. Struct., 81, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00444-3
  21. Soneji, B.B. and Jangid, R.S. (2007), "Passive hybrid system for seismic protection of cable-stayed bridge", Eng. Struct., 29, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.034
  22. Sorace, S. and Terenzi, G. (2001), "Non-linear dynamic modeling and design procedure of FV spring dampers for base isolation", Eng. Struct., 23, 1556-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00063-3
  23. Sorace, S. and Terenzi, G. (2001), "Non-linear dynamic modeling and design procedure of FV spring-dampers for base isolationframe building applications", Eng. Struct., 23, 1568-1576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00064-5
  24. Takewaki, I., Kanamori, M., Yoshitomi, S. and Tsuji, M. (2013), "New experimental system for base isolated structures with various dampers and limit aspect ratio", Earthq. Struct., 5(4), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.4.461
  25. Wen, Y.K. (1976), "Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems", J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, 102, 249-263.
  26. Xie, W. and Sun, L. (2014), "Passive hybrid system for seismic failure mode improvement of a long-span cable-stayed bridges in transverse direction", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(8), 399-411. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.399
  27. Xing, S., Camara, A. and Aijun, Y. (2015), "Effects of seismic devices on transverse responses of piers in the Sutong Bridge", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 14(4), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0049-7

Cited by

  1. Bistable tuned mass damper for suppressing the vortex induced vibrations in suspension bridges vol.18, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.3.313
  2. Early adjusting damping force for sloped rolling-type seismic isolators based on earthquake early warning information vol.20, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.1.039