Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between Clinical Outcomes and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Time in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Assisted Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Cho, Sungsoo (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Wonkyung (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Good Morning Hospital) ;
  • Lim, Seong-Hoon (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Tae Soo (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.04.08
  • Accepted : 2018.05.17
  • Published : 2018.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is increasingly used in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to treat acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who experienced cardiogenic shock. However, to date, there have been no studies on the relationship between clinical outcomes and CPR time in such patients with AMI treated by ECMO-assisted primary PCI. Methods: From July 2008 to March 2016, we analyzed data from 42 AMI with cardiogenic shock patients who underwent CPR and were treated by ECMO-assisted primary PCI. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality after primary PCI. The predictors of mortality were determined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Thirty-day in-hospital mortality was observed for 33 patients (78.6%). The mean CPR time was $37.0{\pm}37.3$ minutes. The best cut-off CPR time value associated with clinical outcome was calculated to be 12.5 minutes using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that CPR time of >12.5 minutes was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-17.406; p=0.018). Conclusions: Despite ECMO support, the clinical outcomes of AMI patients with a complication of cardiogenic shock remain poor. Prolonged CPR time is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with AMI treated by ECMO-assisted primary PCI.

Keywords

References

  1. Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Alpert JS, et al. Cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. Incidence and mortality from a community-wide perspective, 1975 to 1988. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1117-22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199110173251601
  2. Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2005;294:448-54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.4.448
  3. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J. Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation 2009;119:1211-9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947
  4. Werdan K, Gielen S, Ebelt H, Hochman JS. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 2014;35:156-67. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht248
  5. Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1287-96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1208410
  6. Kagawa E, Dote K, Kato M, et al. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiac arrest?: rapid-response extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-arrest percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2012;126:1605-13. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067538
  7. Tsao NW, Shih CM, Yeh JS, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention may improve survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock. J Crit Care 2012;27:530.e1-11.
  8. Wu MY, Tseng YH, Chang YS, Tsai FC, Lin PJ. Using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to rescue acute myocardial infarction with cardiopulmonary collapse: the impact of early coronary revascularization. Resuscitation 2013;84:940-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.019
  9. Chung SY, Tong MS, Sheu JJ, et al. Short-term and long-term prognostic outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by profound cardiogenic shock undergoing early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 2016;223:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.068
  10. Park TK, Yang JH, Choi SH, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by severe refractory cardiogenic shock assisted with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support. Yonsei Med J 2014;55:920-7. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.4.920
  11. Chen YS, Lin JW, Yu HY, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis. Lancet 2008;372:554-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60958-7
  12. Shin TG, Choi JH, Jo IJ, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with inhospital cardiac arrest: a comparison with conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med 2011;39:1-7.
  13. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020-35. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058
  14. Yip HK, Wu CJ, Chang HW, et al. Comparison of impact of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and primary stenting on short-term mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and evaluation of prognostic determinants. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1184-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01491-6
  15. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 2001;285:190-2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.2.190
  16. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2006;295:2511-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.21.2511
  17. Sheu JJ, Tsai TH, Lee FY, et al. Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 2010;38:1810-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e8acf7
  18. Hajbaghery MA, Mousavi G, Akbari H. Factors influencing survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2005;66:317-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.04.004
  19. Reynolds JC, Frisch A, Rittenberger JC, Callaway CW. Duration of resuscitation efforts and functional outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: when should we change to novel therapies? Circulation 2013;128:2488-94. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002408
  20. Jo IJ, Shin TG, Sim MS, et al. Outcome of in-hospital adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation assisted with portable auto-priming percutaneous cardiopulmonary support. Int J Cardiol 2011;151:12-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.050
  21. Kim DH, Kim JB, Jung SH, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Lee JW. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: predictors of survival. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:273-9. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.4.273
  22. Flaherty MP, Khan AR, O'Neill WW. Early initiation of impella in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves survival: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:1805-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.027
  23. Na SJ, Chung CR, Cho YH, et al. Vasoactive inotropic score as a predictor of mortality in adult patients with cardiogenic shock: medical therapy versus ECMO. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 [Epub ahead of print].

Cited by

  1. Update in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Cardiogenic Shock vol.21, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1102-3
  2. Clinical Significance of Low-Flow Time in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Results from the RESCUE Registry vol.9, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113588