DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Pepper for Particle Behavior Analysis

  • Nam, Ju-Seok (Department of Biosystems Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Byun, Jun-Hee (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hyeong (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Myoung-Ho (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Cheol (Department of Bio-industrial Machinery Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2018.07.24
  • Accepted : 2018.08.24
  • Published : 2018.09.01

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the mechanical and physical properties of a Korean red pepper variety for particle behavior analysis. Methods: Poisson's ratio, modulus of elasticity, shear modulus, density, coefficient of restitution, and coefficient of friction were derived for "AR Legend," which is a domestic pepper variety. The modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio were measured through a compression test using a texture analyzer. The shear modulus was calculated from the modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio. The density was measured using a water pycnometer method. The coefficient of restitution was measured using a collision test, and the static and dynamic friction coefficients were measured using a inclined plane test. Each test was repeated 3-5 times except for density measurement, and the results were analyzed using mean values. Results: Poisson's ratios for the pepper fruit and pepper stem were 0.295 and 0.291, respectively. Elastic moduli of the pepper fruit and pepper stem were $1.152{\times}10^7Pa$ and $3.295{\times}10^7Pa$, respectively, and the shear moduli of the pepper fruit and pepper stem were $4.624{\times}10^6Pa$ and $1.276{\times}10^7Pa$, respectively. The density of the pepper fruit and the pepper stem were $601.8kg/m^3$ and $980.4kg/m^3$, respectively. The restitution coefficients between pepper fruits, pepper stems, a pepper fruit and a pepper stem, a pepper fruit and plastic, and a pepper stem and plastic were 0.383, 0.218, 0.277, 0.399, and 0.148, respectively. The coefficients of static friction between pepper fruits, pepper stems, a pepper fruit and a pepper stem, a pepper fruit and plastic, and a pepper stem and plastic were 0.455, 0.332, 0.306, 0.364, and 0.404, respectively. The coefficients of dynamic friction between a pepper fruit and plastic and a pepper stem and plastic were 0.043 and 0.034, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Alibas, L and N. Koksal. 2015. Determination of physical, mechanical, and structural seed properties of pepper cultivars. International Agrophysics 29: 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2015-0015
  2. ASTM standards. 2014. D854: Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. https://doi.org/10.1520/d0854
  3. Barnwal, P., K. K. Singh, A. Sharma, A. K. Chaudhary, T. J. Zachariah and S. N. Saxena. 2015. Selected physical and mechanical properties of black pepper seed (cv. Panniyar-5). International Journal of Seed Spices 5(2): 20-25.
  4. Beer, F. P., E. R. Johnston and D. F. Mazurek. 2016. Vector mechanics for engineers: Statics. 11th ed. Ohio, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. Beer, F. P., E. R. Johnston, J. T. Dewolf and D. F. Mazurek. 2014. Mechanics of materials. 6th ed. Ohio, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
  6. Cakir, E., F. Alayunt and K. Ozden. 2002. A study on the determination of Poisson's ratio and modulus of elasticity of some onion varieties. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1(4): 376-378. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.376.378
  7. Choi, Y. 2006. Development of the pepper mechanical harvesting system. Unpublished PhD diss. Gwangju, Chonnam: Chonnam National University, Department of Agricultural Engineering. (In Korean, with English abstract)
  8. Choi, Y., Y. K. Kim, H. J. Jun, C. H. Lee, J. T. Hong and S. N. Yoo. 2008. Mechanical properties for development of the pepper mechanical harvesting system. The Proceedings of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 13(1): 119-124 (In Korean).
  9. Choi, Y., H. J. Jun, C. K. Lee, C. S. Lee, S. N. Yoo, S. R. Suh and Y. S. Choi. 2010. Development of a mechanical harvesting system for red pepper(I) -surveys on conventional pepper cultivation and mechanization of pepper harvesting-. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(6): 367-372 (In Korean, with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.5307/jbe.2010.35.6.367
  10. Jo, Y. J., M. H. Kim, Y. S. Kang and D. C. Kim. 2016. Development of self-propelled pepper harvester(III) -factorial experiment of separating part-. The Proceedings of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 21(1): 83-84 (In Korean).
  11. Jo, Y. J., Y. S. Kang, J. S. Nam, J. S. Choe, E. Inoue, T. Okayasu and D. C. Kim. 2018. Performance Analysis for a Card Cleaner Type Separating System of Pepper Harvester. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 63 (1): 103-111.
  12. Kim, Y. B., S. K. Lee, S. T. Kim, W. J. La, D. B. Song and H. J. Lee. 2001. Analysis of Geometrical and Physical Properties of Red Pepper by Machine Vision. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 26(3): 287-294 (In Korean, with English abstract).
  13. KOSIS. 2017. 2015 Mechanization Ratio of farm products. Korean Statistical Information Service. Available at: http://kosis.kr. (In Korean)
  14. KOSTAT. 2017. 2016 Current state of farm mechanization. STATISTICS KOREA. Available at: www.index.go.kr/ potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1288. (In Korean)
  15. KREI. 2010. Survey on Global consumption trends in Chile pepper products. Research report No. 2010-09. Korea Rural Economic Institute. (In Korean, with English abstract)
  16. Montellano, C. G., J. M. Fuentes, E. A. Tellez and F. Ayuga. 2012. Determination of the mechanical properties of maize grains and olives required for use in DEM simulations. Journal of Food Engineering 111: 553-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.03.017
  17. Montellano, C. G., A. Ramirez, E. Gallego and F. Ayuga. 2011. Validation and experimental calibration of 3D discrete element models for the simulation of the discharge flow in silos. Chemical Engineering Science 66: 5116-5126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.07.009
  18. Nam, J. S., Y. S. Kang, S. B. Kim and D. C. Kim. 2017. Factorial Experiment for Drum-type Secondary Separating Part of Self-propelled Pepper Harvester. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 42(4): 242-250. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2017.42.4.242
  19. Park, S. H., K. S. Kang, S. J. Park, Y. S. Kang and D. C. Kim. 2016. Development of self-propelled pepper harvester (II) -gross harvester efficiency depending on cultivar-. The Proceedings of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 21(1): 81-82 (In Korean).
  20. Park, S. H., S. J. Park, Y. S. Kang and D. C. Kim. 2015. Development of self-propelled pepper harvester(I) -field test of crop divider-. The Proceedings of the Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery 20(2): 103-104 (In Korean).
  21. Rokayya, S. and E. Khojah. 2016. Physical-mechanical estimation of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fruit varieties. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University 23(3): 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1006-8104(16)30060-5