East Asian mathematical journal

  • 제34권4호
  • /
  • Pages.511-536
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-6973(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-2833(eISSN)
영남수학회 (The Youngnam Mathematical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영재학교의 수학 중심 융합 교육과정 평가 사례 연구

A Case Study Evaluating Math-Oriented Convergent Curriculums in Schools for the Gifted

  • 투고 : 2018.08.09
  • 심사 : 2018.08.31
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

There is currently a growing need to nurture creative and convergent talent in the face of the fourth Industrial Revolution. Developing such talent requires interdisciplinary convergent education across the science, engineering, humanities, social studies, and arts disciplines. Such interdisciplinary convergence could cultivate humanities and social knowledge and qualities along with scientific expertise. In Korea, there are currently six science schools for the gifted that aim to discover and nurture science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) researchers from an early stage, and two science and art schools for the gifted that aim to cultivate new talent combining students' scientific and artistic qualities. These schools establish and follow curriculums that are suited to achieving the education objectives guaranteed by the Gifted Education Promotion Act and its Enforcement Decrees. This study compares the curriculums and curriculum tables of the science schools for the gifted to those of the science and art schools for the gifted to evaluate their methods of operation and performance. Additionally, it determines which curriculums provide an opportunity for students to nurture convergent thinking, and discusses how suitable curriculums could be implemented to develop convergent thinking.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2010). 창의인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국. 2011년 업무보고서.
  2. 김성원, 정영란, 우애란, 이현주 (2012). 융합인재교육(STEAM)을 위한 이론적 모형의 제안. 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.388
  3. 김왕동 (2012). 창의적 융합인재에 관한 개념 틀 정립: 과학기술과 예술 융합 관점. 영재와 영재교육, 11(1), 97-119.
  4. 백윤수, 김영민, 노석구, 박현주, 이주연, 정진수, 최유현, 한혜숙, 최종현 (2012). 융합창의적 인재교육(STEAM) 실행방향 정립을 위한 기초 연구 최종보고서. 한국과학창의재단.
  5. 서혜애, 조석희, 이은아, 한석실, 윤초희 (2003). 영재교육기관 평가체제 개발연구. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  6. 안철수 (2010). 21세기 융합의 시대를 살아가는 다섯 가지 마음가짐. 월간 혁신리더 2010년 3월호.
  7. 한국과학기술단체총연합회 (2011). 미래융합과학기술인재 양성을 위한 STEAM 교육. 2011 대한민국 과학기술연차대회 심포지엄.
  8. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
  9. Davis, G. A. & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  10. Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. J. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: explorations with gifted students. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  11. Jacobson, M. A. (1966). The relationship of creative thinking ability, intelligence and school performance. Dissertation Abstract International, 27A, 7157.
  12. Kaufman, James C. (2009). Creativity 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  13. Lamkins, A. (1978). A model: planning, designing and evaluating identification and instructional programs for gifted, talented and potentially gifted children. Albany, New York: New York State Department of Education.
  14. Provus, M. M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
  15. Renzulli, J. S.(1978). 'What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition' Phi Delta Kappan, 60, pp.180-184, 261.
  16. Renzulli, Joseph A. & Ward V. S. (1969). Diagnostic and evaluative differential education for the gifted. Storrs: University of Connecticut.
  17. Root-Bernstein Robert & Michele Root-Bernstein (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: the link between polymathy and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. et al. (Eds.) Creativity: from potential to realization. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  18. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). CIPP evaluation model checklist. Available at http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cippchecklist.htm.
  19. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2005). CIPP model (context, input, process, product). In S. Mathison (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
  20. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  21. White, R. K.(1931). The versatility of genius. Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 482.