East Asian mathematical journal

  • 제34권4호
  • /
  • Pages.429-449
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-6973(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-2833(eISSN)
영남수학회 (The Youngnam Mathematical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중등수학영재의 수학적 창의성에 대한 고찰

A Study on Mathematical Creativity of Middle School Mathematical Gifted Students

  • 투고 : 2018.08.15
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate how the mathematical creativity of middle school mathematical gifted students is represented through the process of problem posing activities. For this goal, they were asked to pose real-world problems similar to the tasks which had been solved together in advance. This study demonstrated that just 2 of 15 pupils showed mathematical giftedness as well as mathematical creativity. And selecting mathematically creative and gifted pupils through creative problem-solving test consisting of problem solving tasks should be conducted very carefully to prevent missing excellent candidates. A couple of pupils who have been exerting their efforts in getting private tutoring seemed not overcoming algorithmic fixation and showed negative attitude in finding new problems and divergent approaches or solutions, though they showed excellence in solving typical mathematics problems. Thus, we conclude that it is necessary to incorporate problem posing tasks as well as multiple solution tasks into both screening process of gifted pupils and mathematics gifted classes for effective assessing and fostering mathematical creativity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김판수(2014). 문제설정에서의 수학적 창의성 평가 요소에 대한 소고. 영재교육연구, 24(6), 1053-1071. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.6.1053
  2. 김홍원, 김명숙, 방승진, 황동주(1997). 수학 영재 판별 도구 개발 연구(II) -검사제작편-. 한국교육개발원 연구보고 CR97-50, 한국교육개발원.
  3. 나귀수(2017). 수학 영재 학생들의 문제 만들기에 대한 연구. 학교수학, 19(1), 77-93.
  4. 송상헌, 정영옥, 임재훈, 신은주, 이향훈(2007). 수학영재들이 NIM 게임 과제에서 만든 문제만들기 사례분석. 대한수학교육학회지 수학교육학연구, 17(1), 51-66.
  5. 송은선, 한기순 (2018). 영재교육대상자 선정에서 반성적 사고력의 가능성 탐색. 영재교육연구, 28(2), 243-258.
  6. 신희영, 고은성, 이경화 (2007). 수학영재교육에서의 관찰평가와 창의력 평가. 학교수학, 9(2), 241-257.
  7. 장낙한, 유진우, 류해일 (2006). 우리나라 대학부설 과학영재교육원의 영재학생 선발과정에 대한 비교 분석. 영재교육연구, 16(2), 101-122.
  8. Cai, Jinfa, Silver, E. A.(2005). Assessing Students' Mathematical Problem Solving. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(5), 129-135.
  9. Ford, D. Y. (2003). Two other wrongs don't make a right: Sacrificing the needs of diverse students does not solve gifted education's unresolved problems. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26, 283-291. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2003-302
  10. Haylock, D. W.(1997). Recognizing Mathematical Creativity in Schoolchildren. ZDM, Mathematics Educations, 29(3), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0002-y
  11. Krutetskii(1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in School Clildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  12. Leikin, R., Lev, M.(2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: what makes the difference?. ZDM, 45(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0460-8
  13. Leung, S. S.(1997). On the Role of Creative Thinking in Problem Posing. ZDM, 29(3), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0004-9
  14. NCTM(1987). Providing Opportunities for the Mathematically Gifted, K-12. Edited by House, Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
  15. Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The Three-Ring Conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Sheffield, L. J.(2006). Developing Mathematical Promise and Creativity. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 D, 10(1), 1-11.
  17. Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering Creative through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x