DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Damage detection technique for irregular continuum structures using wavelet transform and fuzzy inference system optimized by particle swarm optimization

  • Hamidian, Davood (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman) ;
  • Salajegheh, Eysa (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman) ;
  • Salajegheh, Javad (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman)
  • Received : 2017.11.23
  • Accepted : 2018.06.12
  • Published : 2018.09.10

Abstract

This paper presents a method for detecting damage in irregular 2D and 3D continuum structures based on combination of wavelet transform (WT) with fuzzy inference system (FIS) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). Many damage detection methods study regular structures. This method studies irregular structures and doesn't need response of healthy structures. First the damaged structure is analyzed with finite element methods, and damage response is obtained at the finite element points that have irregular distance, secondly the FIS, which is optimized by PSO is used to obtain responses at points, having equal distance by response at those points that previously obtained by the finite element methods. Then a 2D (for 2D continuum structures) or a 3D (for 3D continuum structures) matrix is performed by equal distance point response. Thirdly, by applying 2D or 3D wavelet transform on 2D or 3D matrix that previously obtained by FIS detail matrix coefficient of WT is obtained. It is shown that detail matrix coefficient can determine the damage zone of the structure by perturbation in the damaged area. In order to illustrate the capability of proposed method some examples are considered.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagheri, A. and Kourehli, S. (2013), "Damage detection of structures under earthquake excitation using discrete wavelet analysis", Asian. J. Civil Eng. (BHRC), 14, 289-304.
  2. Bajaba, N.S. and Alnefaie, K.A. (2005), "Multiple damage detection in structures using wavelet transforms", Emirates J. Eng. Res., 10, 35-40.
  3. Balafas, K. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (2015), "Development and validation of a novel earthquake damage estimation scheme based on the continuous wavelet transform of input and output acceleration measurements", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 44, 501-522. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2529
  4. Chen, B., Chen, Z.W., Wang, G.J. and Xie, W.P. (2014), "Damage detection on sudden stiffness reduction based on discrete wavelet transform", Scientif. World. J., Article ID 807620, 1-16.
  5. Chen, C. and Oyadiji, S.O. (2017), "Damage detection using modal frequency curve and squared residual wavelet coefficients-based damage indicator", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 83, 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.06.021
  6. Hajizadeh, A.R., Salajegheh, E. and Salajegheh, J. (2016), "2-D Discrete wavelet-based crack detection using static and dynamic responses in plate structures", Asian. J. Civil Eng. (BHRC), 17, 713-735.
  7. Hajizadeh, A.R., Salajegheh, J. and Salajegheh, E. (2016), "Performance evaluation of wavelet and curvelet transforms based-damage detection of crack types in plate structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 60, 667-691. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.4.667
  8. Kaarna, A., Krasavin, K., Parkkinen, J., Jaaskelainen, T. and Schyndel, R.V. (2008), "Watermarking spectral images with three-dimensional wavelet transform subject to various illumination conditions", J. Imaging. Sci. Techn., 52(3), 30502, 1-18.
  9. Kim, H. and Melhem, H. (2004), "Damage detection of structures by wavelet analysis", Eng. Struct., 26, 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.008
  10. Li, L.J., Huang, Z.B., Liu, F. and Wu, Q.H. (2007), "A heuristic particle swarm optimizer for optimization of pin connected structures", Comput. Struct., 85, 340-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.11.020
  11. Lotfollahi-Yaghin, M.A. and Hesari, M.A. (2008), "Using wavelet analysis in crack detection at the arch concrete dam under frequency analysis with FEM", World. Appl. Sci. J., 3, 691-704.
  12. Magdalena, R. (2011), "Damage detection in beams using wavelet transform on higher vibration modes", J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 49, 399-417.
  13. Mallat, S. (2008), Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Academic Press, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  14. Mallikarjuna, R.D. and Swarnamani, S. (2012), "Damage detection and identification in structures by spatial waveletbased approach", Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng., 10, 69-87.
  15. Mamdani, E.H. and Assilian, S. (1975), "An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller", Int. J. Man. Mach. Stud., 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(75)80002-2
  16. Nguyen, H.T. and Walker, E.A. (2005), A First Course in Fuzzy Logic, 3rd Edition, Chapman and Hall.
  17. Obrien, E.J., Carey, C. and Keenahan, J. (2015), "Bridge damage detection using ambient traffic and moving force identification", Struct. Control. Hlth., 22, 1396-1407. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1749
  18. Ovanesova, A.V. and Suarez, L.E. (2004), "Applications of wavelet transform to damage detection in frame structures", Eng. Struct., 26, 39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.08.009
  19. Perez, R.E. and Behdinan, K. (2007), "Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization", Comput. Struct., 85, 1579-1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.10.013
  20. Sivanandam, S.N., Sumathi, S. and Deepa, S.N. (2007), Introduction to Fuzzy Logic using MATLAB, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
  21. Staszewski, W.J. (1998), "Structural and mechanical damage detection using wavelets", Shock. Vib. Dig., 30, 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000602
  22. Sugeno, M. (1985), "An introductory survey of fuzzy control", Inform. Sci., 36, 59-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(85)90026-X
  23. Zhao, B. (2012), "Crack identification of the sprocket wheel in sintering machine based on WFEM", Appl. Math. Model., 36, 2701-2709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.053

Cited by

  1. Output-only structural damage detection under multiple unknown white noise excitations vol.79, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.79.3.327