DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Causes of Failure during the Management Process from Identification of Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donors to Actual Donation in Korea: a 5-Year Data Analysis (2012-2016)

  • Kim, Mi-im (Transplantation Center, Korea University Anam Hospital) ;
  • Oh, Jaesook (Korea Organ Donation Agency) ;
  • Cho, Won Hyun (Korea Organ Donation Agency) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Sik (Department of Acute Care Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Cheol Woong (Department of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • You, Young-Dong (Department of Acute Care Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Gwon, Jun-Gyo (Department of Transplantation and Vascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jae-myeong (Department of Acute Care Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.06.22
  • Accepted : 2018.08.27
  • Published : 2018.12.10

Abstract

Background: This retrospective study analyzed the causes of failure in the management process from the identification of brain-dead potential organ donors to actual donation in Korea over the past 5 years. Methods: Data of 8,120 potential brain deaths reported to the Korea Organ Donation Agency were used, including information received at the time of reporting, donation suitability evaluation performed by the coordinator after the report, and data obtained from interviews of hospital medical staff and the donor's family. Results: From January 2012 to December 2016, the total number of brain-dead potential organ donors in Korea was 8,120, of which 2,348 (28.9%) underwent organ procurement surgery with designated recipients. While the number of transplant donors has increased over time, the ratio of transplant donors to medically suitable brain-dead donors has decreased. The common causes of donation failure included donation refusal (27.6%), non-brain death (15.5%), and incompatible donation (11.6%); 104 potential donors (7.8%) were unable to donate their organs because they were not pronounced brain dead. Conclusion: The rate of successful organ donation may be increased by analyzing the major causes of failure in the brain-dead organ donation management process and engaging in various efforts to prevent such failures.

Keywords

References

  1. International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation (IRODaT). Donation activity charts. http://www.irodat.org/?p=database#data. Updated 2017. Accessed February 14, 2017.
  2. Kim SC. Live organ transplants and autonomous decisions of patients: focusing on the discussions made in Japan. Law Rev 2008;29:125-58.
  3. Yoo JM, Hong MC, Lee MS. Changes in the governance of organ sharing in Korea: Possibility of cooperative governance. J Gov Stud 2017;12(3):169-96.
  4. Jeon MG, Lee JS. The problems of law on transplantation of internal organs etc and plan to improve. Natl Law Study 2012;8(2):121-41.
  5. Korean Organ Donation Agency. Brain death. http://www.koda1458.kr/brain/judgment.do. Updated 2017. Accessed September 13, 2017.
  6. Korean Organ Donation Agency. 2015 annual data report. http://www.koda1458.kr/pr/stats.do. Updated 2015. Accessed February 14, 2017.
  7. Korean Network for Organ Sharing. 2016 transplantation guideline. https://www.konos.go.kr/konosis/common/bizlogic.jsp. Updated 2017. Accessed September 13, 2017.
  8. Lee JM, Kim SJ, Lee WJ, Park EJ, Min YG. Assessment of brain-dead potential organ donors. J Transplant Technol Res 2016;6(1):154.
  9. Simpkin AL, Robertson LC, Barber VS, Young JD. Modifiable factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation: systematic review. BMJ 2009;338:b991. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b991
  10. Lee SM. Korean's cultural perspective and ethics of transplantation. J Ethics Educ Stud 2005;(8):241-59.
  11. Lee EW, Jang HY, Han SY, Han KH, Oh SW, Roh YN. Influencing factors affecting successful organ donation and families' consent to donate after brain death. J Korean Soc Transplant 2017;31(1):43-8. https://doi.org/10.4285/jkstn.2017.31.1.43
  12. Chivukula S, Tempel ZJ, Zwagerman NT, Newman WC, Shin SS, Chen CJ, et al. The dynamic gait index in evaluating patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus for cerebrospinal fluid diversion. World Neurosurg 2015;84(6):1871-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.021
  13. Joo HN. Jurisprudence of Brain Death and Organ Transplantation. Busan: Dongrim; 1997, 96-8.
  14. German Medical Association. Guidelines for Determining Brain Death. 1998, 1861-8.
  15. Joo HN. The determination of brain death. Kyung Hee Law J 2007;42(1):167-85.
  16. Rosendale JD, Chabalewski FL, McBride MA, Garrity ER, Rosengard BR, Delmonico FL, et al. Increased transplanted organs from the use of a standardized donor management protocol. Am J Transplant 2002;2(8):761-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20810.x
  17. Rosendale JD, Kauffman HM, McBride MA, Chabalewski FL, Zaroff JG, Garrity ER, et al. Aggressive pharmacologic donor management results in more transplanted organs. Transplantation 2003;75(4):482-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000045683.85282.93

Cited by

  1. 순환정지 후 장기기증의 의료윤리적 문제 vol.17, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22730/jmls.2020.17.3.74
  2. Analysis of Factors Affecting Emergency Physicians’ Attitudes toward Deceased Organ & Tissue Donation vol.36, pp.49, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e329
  3. Cultural sensitivity in brain death determination: a necessity in end-of-life decisions in Japan vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00626-2