Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Direction of Reading and Information Service through Analysis of Digital Reading and Information Literacy Competencies Evaluation Items: Focusing on PIAAC and PISA

디지털 독서 및 정보 리터러시 평가 문항 분석을 통한 독서 및 정보 서비스의 방향 탐색 - PIAAC와 PISA를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2018.07.16
  • Accepted : 2018.08.11
  • Published : 2018.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the items related to digital reading and information literacy which were measured by PIAAC and PISA, to examine the measurement contents and methods of these literacy items, and to derive the implications for providing reading and information services for librarians at public libraries and teacher librarians. In order to solve the questions measuring digital reading literacy and digital information literacy, respondents commonly needed ICT skills as well as cognitive strategies. However, in digital reading literacy measurement items, the ability to comprehend and critically think about texts was emphasized. And in digital information literacy measurement items, the ability to use ICT skills, navigate, and evaluate whether or not to read the retrieved text was emphasized. Librarians and teacher librarians need to encourage readers to read and provide a customized competencies improvement program to reflect the performance results and characteristics of a particular group. And It is also necessary to improve and develop the library environment so that library user can understand and use library search system and the Korean decimal classification.

본 연구의 목적은 국제 성인 역량 평가(PIAAC)와 국제 학업성취도 평가(PISA)에서 측정된 디지털 독서 리터러시 및 디지털 정보 리터러시 문항의 측정 내용과 방법을 살펴보고 공공도서관의 사서와 초 중등학교의 사서교사가 독서 및 정보 서비스를 제공하는 데에 필요한 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 디지털 독서 리터러시나 디지털 정보 리터러시 측정 문항을 해결하기 위하여 응답자는 인지 전략과 더불어 ICT 기술 역량이 공통적으로 필요하였다. 다만 디지털 독서 리터러시 측정 문항에서는 텍스트를 종합적으로 이해하고 비판적으로 사고하는 능력이 강조되었으며 디지털 정보 리터러시 측정 문항에서는 ICT 활용 능력과 항해(navigation) 능력 및 검색된 텍스트를 읽을 것인지를 평가하는 능력이 강조되었다. 사서나 사서교사들은 이용자들의 독서를 더욱 권장할 필요가 있으며, 특정한 집단의 성취결과나 특성을 반영하여 맞춤형 역량 향상 프로그램을 제공할 필요가 있다. 또한 자료 검색시스템과 한국십진분류법에 대한 이해와 활용이 가능하도록 도서관 환경을 정비하고 개발할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT and Korea Internet and Security Agency. 2017. Summary Report of Internet Usage Survey in 2017. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 20.]
  2. Ministry of Education, Ministry of Employment and Labor and Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training. 2013. Competence, learning and work in Korea: Report of PIAAC. Seoul: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
  3. Ministry of Education et al. 2013. Key findings of the PIAAC. Seoul: Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
  4. Kim, Nam Hee. 2012. "PISA Reading Literacy and 21C Korean Competence." Korean Language Education, 138: 41-71.
  5. Kim, Eunha and Lee, Taemoon. 2015. A Case Study on the State of Reading and Policy for the Promotion of Reading Culture in Major Countries in 2015. Sejong: Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism.
  6. Park, Juhyeon. 2018. "Study on the Development of Conceptualization Model for Reading, Information, ICT, and Digital Literacy." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2): 267-300.
  7. Park, Ju-Hyeon and Chang, Woo-Kwon. 2014. "Analysis of PISA 2009 Impacts of School Library Level Variables on Academic Achievement." Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3): 331-351. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.331
  8. Park, Hyun-Jeong, Ha, Yeojin and Park, Min-Ho. 2011. "Application of the mixture modeling to the student characteristics and reading achievement according to the patterns of ICT use." Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(3): 733-754.
  9. Bae, Kyung-Jae and Park, Hee-Jin. 2013. "A Study on the Current Condition and the Improvement of Digital Literacy Education." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2): 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  10. Byun, Woo-Yeoul. 2003. "Some Suggestions on Reading Education in the Knowledge-Information Society." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 34(1): 1-17.
  11. Song, Kyeong-Jin. 2016. "A Study on Development of Literacy Program Model for Adult Users of Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4): 175-204. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.4.175
  12. Song, Kyeong-Jin and Cha, Mikyeong. 2014. "A Study on the Concept of Literacy in Library and Information Science and in Public Library Services." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4): 215-240.
  13. Song, Gi-Ho. 2011. "Alternative Measures for Improvement of Information Literacy as Cross Curricula under the national Curriculum in Korea." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 29-50.
  14. Yoo, Sarah. 2018. "A Diagnostic Analysis of LIS Curriculum from the Meta-literacy Perspective." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2): 191-220.
  15. Lee, Kyeong-Hwa and Song, Gi-Ho. 2016. "A Study on Development of Libraries' Information Literacy Program based on Integrated Tasks to Support the Free Semester System." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(4): 85-104. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.4.085
  16. Lee, Byeong-Ki. 2011. "A Study on the Developmental Tools of Performance Task for Information Literacy Instruction." Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(4): 31-50. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.4.201112.31
  17. Chang, Durk-Hyun and Choi, Go-Un. 2008. "A Study on the Development of Information Literacy Instruction for University Libraries." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 19(1): 37-60.
  18. Chang, Yunkeum et al. 2016. "A Study on the Public Library As a Place of ICT Literacy Training." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 27(3): 273-294. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2016.27.3.273
  19. Ju, Jaewook et al. 2016 Korea Media Panel Survey. Chungcheongbuk-do: Korea Information Society Development Institute
  20. Jung, Youngmi. 2018. "A Study on Digital Literacy Education for Adults in US Public Libraries." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(1): 359-380.
  21. Chung, Jun-min. 2009. "A Library Service Model Toward Ubiquitous City." Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 20(3): 163-169.
  22. Cho, Jimin et al. 2011. Comparative analysis or the characteristics of reading achievement based on the results of PISA 2009. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  23. Choi, Jae-Hwang. 2016. "Considering Core Ideas of ACRL Information Literacy 'Framework (2015)'." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3): 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171
  24. American Association of School Librarians(AASL). 2007. Standards for the 21st-Century Learner. Chicago: ALA.
  25. American Association of School Librarians(AASL). 2018. National School Library Standards for Learner, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago: ALA Editions.
  26. Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  27. Eisenberg, M. B. 2008. "Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age." Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2): 39-47.
  28. Eisenderg, M. B. 2011. "Develop and Deliver Essential Information Literacy Programs." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(2): 5-21.
  29. Gorman, M. 1998. Our Singular Strengths: Meditations for Librarians. Chicago: American Library Association.
  30. OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD.
  31. OECD. 2011. PISA 2009 Results: Students On line-Volume VI. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 21.]
  32. OECD. 2012. Literacy, Numeracy and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments: Framework for the OECD Survey of Adult Skills. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 22.]
  33. OECD. 2013a. OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 23.]
  34. OECD. 2013b. The Survey of Adult Skills: Reader's Companion. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 24.]
  35. OECD. 2016. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks-May 2016. [online] [cited 2018. 4. 3.]
  36. OECD. 2018a. PISA Released Field Trial New Reading Items. [online] [cited 2018. 5. 9.]
  37. OECD. 2018b. Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC 2015): Full selection of indicators. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 1.]
  38. OECD Home page. Summary of Assessment Domains. [online] [cited 2018. 7. 1.]
  39. Owusu-Ansah, E. K. 2003. "Information Literacy and the Academic Library: A Critical Look At a Concept and the Controversies Surrounding It." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(4): 219-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(03)00040-5
  40. O'Reilly, T. and Sabatini, J. 2013. Reading for Understanding: How Performance Moderators and Scenarios Impact Assessment Design. [online] [cited 2018. 6. 20.]
  41. Ritchhart, R. 2001. "From IQ to IC: A Dispositional View of Intelligence." Roeper Review, 23(3): 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554086
  42. Shenton, A. K. 2007. "Causes of Information-seeking Failure: Some Insights from an English Research Project." In Chelton, M. K. and Cool, C. ed. Youth Information-seeking Behavior II: Context, Theories, Models, and Issues. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press.
  43. Shenton, A. K. 2011. "Information literacy + Reading Skills = Successful Information Behaviour." Literacy Today, 67: 21-23.
  44. Todd, R. J. 2010. "From Information to Knowledge: The Information Literacy Conundrum." Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(4): 131-153. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.131
  45. UNESCO. 2005. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2006: Education for All Literacy for Life. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
  46. Wolf, S., Brush, T. and Saye, J. 2003. "The Big Six Information Skills as a Metacognitive Scaffold: A Case Study." School Library Media Research, 6.