DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Management Methods of Bone Mineral Density Examination Using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry

이중에너지 엑스선 흡광분석법을 이용한 골밀도검사의 관리법

  • Kim, Ho-Sung (Department of Radiological Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hyung (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Hyun (Department of Radiological Science, Shinhan University)
  • 김호성 (신한대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 김태형 (강원대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 김상현 (신한대학교 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2018.07.27
  • Accepted : 2018.08.21
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

In recent years, demand for examination of bone mineral density (BMD) is increasing in Korea according aging society. Therefore, it is required to develop an efficient management program that can increase the safety and reliability of Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) that can be applied to the criteria of the World Health Organization. It is necessary to develop a management program that can design a program to improve the accuracy and precision of the results of the analysis and to improve the accuracy of diagnosis of osteoporosis by development a high quality DXA report. It is recommended to prepare the examination manuals and to establish procedures of standard operating including the program to prevent the pitfalls during the examination, the compatibility evaluation of the examination data, and the contents of the radiation safety. In addition, relevant regulations on the production of high-quality DXA reports are required and government and related agencies should introduce individual and facility recognition programs through DXA measurement and education programs and training. It is considered that efforts should be made to prepare high quality DXA report by guidelines on all aspects of BMD for preparation about aging society.

Keywords

References

  1. Daily Medi, October 22, 2017. http://www.dailymedi.com/detail.php?number=823533
  2. Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 1994; 4: 368-381 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01622200
  3. Bouxsein ML, Seeman E. Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 23: 741-753 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2009.09.008
  4. Lenchik L, Leib ES, Hamdy RC, et al. Executive summary International Society for Clinical Densitometry position development conference Denver, Colorado July 20-22, 2001. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5:S1-S3. https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:5:3S:S01
  5. Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR, et al. Official positions of the international society for clinical densitometry. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2004; 89(8): 3651-3655 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-0124
  6. Lewiecki EM, Lane NE. Common mistakes in the clinical use of bone mineral density testing. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008; 4: 667-674 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0928
  7. Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Petak SM. DXA quality matters. J Clin Densitom. 2006; 9:388-392 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2006.07.002
  8. Watts NB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 847-854 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1681-7
  9. Messina C, Bandirali M, Sconfienza LM, et al. Prevalence and type of errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 1504-1511 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3509-y
  10. Kim TY, Schafer AL. Variability in DXA Reporting and other challenges in osteoporosis evaluation. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 393-395 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7550
  11. Fenton JJ, Robbins JA, Amarnath AL, Franks P. Osteoporosis overtreatment in a regional health care system. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176: 391-393
  12. Lee YH, Lee IJ, Yong HJ. The Study on Bone Mineral Density Measurement Error in Accordance with Change in Region Of Interest (ROI) by Utilizing Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Journal of Radiological Technology and Science 2012;35(1):1-7
  13. Kim JS, Rho YH, Lee IJ, et. al. A Status Report on Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Quality Control in Korea. Journal of Radiological Technology and Science 2016;39(4):527-534 https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.4.06
  14. Faulkner KG. Clinical use of bone densitometry. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, editors. Osteoporosis, Two-Volume Set. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001 chapter 59.
  15. The Writing Group for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference. Technical standardization for dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom. 2004; 7:27-36. https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:7:1:27
  16. Khan AA, Colquhoun A, Hanley DA, et al. Standards and guidelines for technologists performing central dualenergy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 2007; 10:189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.005
  17. Bonnick SL, Lewis LA. Bone Densitometry for Technologists. New York, London: Springer 2013.
  18. Pearson D, Cawte SA. Long-term quality control of DXA: a comparison of Shewhart rules and Cusum charts. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7:338-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623774
  19. Bonnick SL. Bone Densitometry in Clinical Practice: Application and Interpretation. New York, NY: Humana 2010.
  20. Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G, Link TM. Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20: 2707-2714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1845-0
  21. Guglielmi G, Diano D, Ponti F, Bazzocchi A. Quality assurance in bone densitometry. Current Radiology Reports. 2014; 2(2): 1-6.
  22. Leslie WD, Moayyeri A. Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1673-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0170-6
  23. International Society for Clinical Densitometry: 2017 ISCD Official Positions. http://www.iscd.org/ official-positions/2017-iscd-official-positionsadult/. Accessed 2017. The new official positions of the ISCD as updated in 2017 about phantom scanning, precision assessment and cross-calibration of DXA machines.
  24. Donnelly LF, Dickerson JM, Goodfriend MA, Muething SE. Improving patient safety: effects of a safety program on performance and culture in a department of radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 165-171 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2086
  25. Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Vrahoriti H, Kontakis G, Varveris H, Gourtsoyiannis N. Embryo/fetus radiation dose and risk from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13:716-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980200098
  26. Masud T, Langley S, Wiltshire P, Doyle DV, Spector TD. Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis. BMJ. 1993;307:172-173. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6897.172
  27. Svendsen OL, Hassager C, Skodt T, Christiansen C. Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip and forearm: a human cadaveric study. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:868-873
  28. Phillipov G, Seaborn CJ, Phillips PJ. Reproducibility of DXA: potential impact on serial measurements and misclassification of osteoporosis, Osteoporos Int. 2001;12:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170157
  29. Faulkner KG. Clinical use of bone densitometry. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, editors. Osteoporosis, Two-Volume Set. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001 chapter 59.
  30. Shepherd JA, Lu Y, Wilson K, et al. Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.005
  31. Larkin A, Sheahan N, O'Connor U, Gray L, Dowling A, Vano E, Torbica P, Salat D, Schreiner A, Neofotistou V, et al. QA/acceptance testing of DEXA X-ray systems used in bone mineral densitometry. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2008;129:279-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn086
  32. Blake GM, Naeem M, Boutros M. Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations. Bone. 2006;38:935-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.007
  33. Boudousq V, Kotzki PO, Dinten JM, Barrau C, Robert-Coutant C, Thomas E, et al. Total Dose incurred by patients and staff from BMD measurement using a new 2D digital bone densitometer, Osteoporos. Int. May 2003: 263-269.
  34. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Council Directive 97/43/ EURATOM on Health Protection of Individuals against the Dangers of Ionising Radiation in relation to Medical Exposure. Official Journal of the European Communities, Luxembourg 1996.
  35. EU 2000; Publication 118: Referral Guidelines.
  36. EU 1998; Research Guidelines, Publication 99.
  37. Huda W, Morin RL. Patient doses in bone mineral densitometry, Br. J. Radiol. May 1996;69:422-425. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-821-422
  38. Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Morgan SL, et al. Best practices for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement and reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance. J Clin Densitom 2016; 19: 127-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2016.03.003
  39. Kim JS, Rho YH, Lee IJ, et al. A Status Report on Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Quality Control in Korea, Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2016; 39(4): 527-534 https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2016.39.4.06
  40. Kim HS, Research on the Bone Mineral Densitometer Quality Control and the Precision Test of Radio- Technologists by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at Metropolitan Area Hospital. Journal of Radiation Industry. 2017;11(4): 283-289
  41. Watts NB. Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:847-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1681-7
  42. Jergas M, Genant HK. Current methods and recent advances in the diagnosis of Osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:1649-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780361203
  43. Johnston CC, Slemenda CW, Melton LJ. Clinical use of bone densitometry. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1105-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199104183241606