DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Correlation and Group Difference for Selection of Elementary Fusion Gifted Students

초등융합영재 선발요소의 상관관계 및 그룹 차이 분석

  • Min, Meekyung (Seokyeong University, Dept. of Computer Science) ;
  • Kim, Kapsu (Seoul National University of Education, Dept. of Computer Education)
  • 민미경 (서경대학교 컴퓨터과학과) ;
  • 김갑수 (서울교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2018.08.06
  • Accepted : 2018.08.28
  • Published : 2018.08.31

Abstract

In the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, talents should not be subordinated to a particular discipline, but must be able to converge a variety of disciplines. It is important to have a fused thinking because elementary school students are likely to make various changes. Therefore, when selecting elementary gifted students, they are selecting students for fusion gifted students. This study examines the effects of creative problem solving ability, document evaluation, and interview factors on student selection when selecting students for gifted students. The results show that creative problem solving ability has the most influence on selection. In the case of the fifth graders, the creative problem solving ability and the document evaluation influence the selection. In fourth graders, the creative problem solving ability and interview affect the selection. In the case of female students, it was found that creative problem solving ability and document evaluation influenced selection. In addition, there was a gender difference in the evaluation of documents in the gender difference analysis. There is no significant difference between the three groups in the grade-by-grade difference analysis.

4차 산업혁명시대에 필요한 인재는 특정 학문에 종속되는 것이 아니라 여러 학문들을 융합할 수 있어야 한다. 초등학생들의 경우에 다양한 변화의 가능성이 있기 때문에 융합적인 사고를 갖는 것이 중요하다. 따라서 초등학교 영재를 선발할 때에도 융합 영재 학생들을 선발하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 융합 영재 학생들을 선발할 때에 창의적인 문제 해결력, 서류 평가, 면접 요소들이 학생 선발에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 알아본다. 연구 결과 창의적 문제해결력이 선발에 미치는 영향력이 가장 높다. 5학년의 경우에는 창의적인 문제 해결력과 서류 평가가 선발에 영향을 미치고, 4학년의 경우에는 창의적인 문제 해결력과 면접이 선발에 영향을 미치고. 여학생들은 창의적인 문제해결력과 서류 평가가 선발에 영향을 미친다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 그룹별로 차이를 분석한 결과, 성별에서는 서류 평가에서 성별로 차이가 있었고, 학년별 유의미한 차이점이 없다는 것을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, C.I. etc (2007). Analysis of Selection Items Test for Selecting Scientifically Gifted Students in Chemistry Class, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2008, 52(3).
  2. Choi, M.H., Jhun Y.S. (2010). Discourse Analysis for Deriving Characteristics of Science-gifted Elementary Students in Inquiry Activities, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 20(1), 369-388.
  3. Gardner, H. Frames of minds: The theory of multiple intelligence; Basic Books: New York, U.S.A., 1983.
  4. Guilford, J. P. Psychological Review 1982, 89, 48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.48
  5. Han, S.G. (2011). A Educational Program for Elementary Information Gifted Student using Unplugged Computing and EPL Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 15(1), 31-38.
  6. Khatena, J.; Torrance, E. P. Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory, Stoelting Company; Chicago U.S.A., 1976.
  7. Kim, K.S. (2012). A Modular Integrated Curriculum Model for the Gifted Information Children, Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 16(3), 299-307.
  8. Kim, K.S. (2013). A Study of Programming Educational Method based on Concept CLIP for Gifted Children in Information Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 24(1), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.24.1.201303.291
  9. Kim, K.S., Lee, J.H. (2012). A study on a Development of a Challenge Course for Gifted Children in Information, Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 23(3), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.23.3.201209.145
  10. Lee In ho, Han, Kisoon (2009). The Analysis of Teacher's Recommendation Usefulness in Selecting Scientific Gifted Students, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(2), 381-401.
  11. Lee, K. H., etc. (2009). A Research on the Relationship between Creativity, Thinking Skill, and Academic Achievement and the Identifying Reference of the Gifted Students in Math and Science, Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(3), 543-560.
  12. Lim, C.W. (2010). Item Analysis for Selecting Science Gifted Elementary School Student, Jour. Sci. Edu, 34(1), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2010.34.1.155
  13. Marland, S. P. Education of the gifted and talented; U. S. Government Printing Office: Washington D.C., U.S.A., 1972.
  14. Park, J.S. Kim, Y.S. (2010). Developing the Enrichment Curriculum for Gifted Children in Informatics Education Using Delphi Method, The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(4), 13-26.
  15. Renzulli, J. S. Phi Delta Kappan 1978, 59, 180.
  16. Sternberg, R. J. High Ability Studies 2003, 14, 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163807
  17. Sternberg, R. J. Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: San Diago, U.S.A., 1986.
  18. Terman, L. M. Genetic studies of genius. Themental and physical trait of a thousand gifted children, Vol. 1; Stanford University Press: Stanford, U.S.A., 1925.
  19. Yoo, Mi-Hyun, Kang, Yun-Hee, Yeh, Hong-Jin (2011). Analysis Identification Results of Gifted Students by Class Observations and Nominations in the Science-Gifted Education Center at University, Journal of Science Education for the Gifted, 3(2), 27-38.
  20. Yoon, C.I. (2014). the Validity of Teacher Nominations for the Selection of Scientifically Gifted Students, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 679-701. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.4.679