Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

대한견·주관절의학회 (Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship of Intraoperative Anatomical Landmarks, the Scapular Plane and the Perpendicular Plane with Glenoid for Central Guide Insertion during Shoulder Arthroplasty

  • Kim, Jung-Han (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Min, Young-Kyoung (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.13
  • 심사 : 2018.06.20
  • 발행 : 2018.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: This study was undertaken to evaluate the positional relationship between planes of the glenoid component (the scapular plane and the perpendicular plane to the glenoid) and its surrounding structures. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) images of both shoulders of 100 patients were evaluated using the 3-dimensional CT reconstruction program ($Aquarius^{(R)}$; TeraRecon). We determined the most lateral scapular bony structure of the scapular plane and measured the shortest distance between the anterolateral corner of the acromion and the scapular plane. The distance between the scapular plane and the midpoint of the line connecting the posterolateral corner of acromion and the anterior tip of the coracoid process (fulcrum axis) was also evaluated. The perpendicular plane was then adjusted to the glenoid and the same values were re-assessed. Results: The acromion was the most lateral scapular structure of scapular plane and perpendicular plane to the glenoid. The average distance from the anterolateral corner of the acromion to the scapular plane was $10.44{\pm}5.11mm$, and to the plane perpendicular to the glenoid was $9.55{\pm}5.13mm$. The midpoint of fulcrum axis was positioned towards the acromion and was measured at $3.90{\pm}3.21mm$ from the scapular plane and at $3.84{\pm}3.17mm$ from the perpendicular plane to the glenoid. Conclusions: Our data indicates that the relationship between the perpendicular plane to the glenoid plane and its surrounding structures is reliable and can be used as guidelines during glenoid component insertion (level of evidence: Level IV, case series, treatment study).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Strauss EJ, Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, Zuckerman JD. The glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(5):819-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.008
  2. Aaron DL, Flatow EL. Glenoid component design and fixation in total shoulder arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 2012;23(2):99-102. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2012.03.007
  3. Gregory TM, Sankey A, Augereau B, et al. Accuracy of glenoid component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty and its effect on clinical and radiological outcome in a retrospective, longitudinal, monocentric open study. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075791
  4. Gunther SB, Lynch TL. Total shoulder replacement surgery with custom glenoid implants for severe bone deficiency. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(5):675-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.023
  5. Clitherow HD, Frampton CM, Astley TM. Effect of glenoid cementation on total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the shoulder: a review of the New Zealand national joint registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(6):775-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.022
  6. Iannotti JP, Norris TR. Influence of preoperative factors on outcome of shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(2):251-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200302000-00011
  7. Braunstein V, Korner M, Brunner U, Mutschler W, Biberthaler P, Wiedemann E. The fulcrum axis: a new method for determining glenoid version. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(5):819-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.02.018
  8. Papadonikolakis A, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA 3rd. Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(24):2205-12. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00552
  9. Braunstein V, Kirchhoff C, Ockert B, et al. Use of the fulcrum axis improves the accuracy of true anteroposterior radiographs of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(8):1049-53.
  10. Sabesan V, Callanan M, Sharma V, Iannotti JP. Correction of acquired glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(7):964-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.019
  11. Sears BW, Johnston PS, Ramsey ML, Williams GR. Glenoid bone loss in primary total shoulder arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(9):604-13. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604
  12. Deutsch A, Abboud JA, Kelly J, et al. Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):706-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.01.007
  13. Flurin PH, Janout M, Roche CP, Wright TW, Zuckerman J. Revision of the loose glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71 Suppl 2:68-76.
  14. Ho JC, Sabesan VJ, Iannotti JP. Glenoid component retroversion is associated with osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(12):e82. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00336
  15. Iannotti JP, Greeson C, Downing D, Sabesan V, Bryan JA. Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.02.011
  16. Farron A, Terrier A, Buchler P. Risks of loosening of a prosthetic glenoid implanted in retroversion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(4):521-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.003
  17. Matsen FA 3rd, Clinton J, Lynch J, Bertelsen A, Richardson ML. Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(4):885-96. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01263
  18. Meyer NJ, Pennington WT, Ziegler DW. The glenoid center point: a magnetic resonance imaging study of normal scapular anatomy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36(4):200-2.
  19. Kircher J, Wiedemann M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P. Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: a prospective-randomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(4):515-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.014
  20. Nguyen D, Ferreira LM, Brownhill JR, et al. Improved accuracy of computer assisted glenoid implantation in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in-vitro randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):907-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.022
  21. Stubig T, Petri M, Zeckey C, et al. 3D navigated implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty. Feasibility and results in an anatomic study. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(4):480-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1519
  22. Landau JP, Hoenecke HR. Genetic and biomechanical determinants of glenoid version: implications for glenoid implant placement in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(4):661-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.012
  23. Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(3):487-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006
  24. Shapiro TA, McGarry MH, Gupta R, Lee YS, Lee TQ. Biomechanical effects of glenoid retroversion in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(3):S90-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.07.010
  25. Hsu JE, Ricchetti ET, Huffman GR, Iannotti JP, Glaser DL. Addressing glenoid bone deficiency and asymmetric posterior erosion in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(9):1298-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.014
  26. Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Dembitsky N, Patil S, D'Lima DD. Optimizing glenoid component position using threedimensional computed tomography reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(4):637-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.11.021
  27. Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D'Lima DD. Accuracy of CT-based measurements of glenoid version for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(2):166-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.08.009
  28. Barrett WP, Franklin JL, Jackins SE, Wyss CR, Matsen FA 3rd. Total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(6):865-72. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198769060-00011
  29. Le SV, Conrad B, Wright TW. Application of the fulcrum axis to estimate the central scapular axis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(8):1143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.002
  30. Budge MD, Lewis GS, Schaefer E, Coquia S, Flemming DJ, Armstrong AD. Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(4):577-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.003