DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrasonographic Findings of Subcutaneous Angioleiomyomas in the Extremities Based on Pathologic Subtypes

  • Kim, Dong Gun (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sun Joo (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Choo, Hye Jung (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sung Kwan (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital) ;
  • Cha, Jang Gyu (Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Park, Hee Jin (Department of Radiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital) ;
  • Kwon, Jong Won (Department of Radiology, Dongcheon Dongkang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Tae Eun (Department of Radiology, Daegu Fatima Hospital) ;
  • Jung, Soo-Jin (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.05.08
  • Accepted : 2018.02.10
  • Published : 2018.08.01

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the ultrasonographic findings of angioleiomyoma based on pathological subtypes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients with subcutaneous angioleiomyomas in the extremities were retrospectively reviewed by two radiologists and a pathologist. Sonographic images were analyzed to evaluate each tumor's anatomic location, size, shape, margin, heterogeneity, echogenicity, associated findings, and vascularity. Results: Angioleiomyomas were divided into 3 subtypes: capillary (n = 16), venous (n = 22), and cavernous (n = 1). The one cavernous angioleiomyoma was a hypoechoic mass with rich vascularity. Hypoechogenicity was more frequently observed for venous tumors (77.3%) than for capillary tumors (43.8%), and isoechogenicity was more frequently observed for capillary tumors (56.2%) than for venous tumors (22.7%). Moderate vascularity was more frequently observed for venous tumors (59.1%) than for capillary tumors (12.5%), and little vascularity was more frequently observed for capillary tumors (62.5%) than for venous tumors (13.6%). The aforementioned findings including echogenicity (p = 0.034) and vascularity (p = 0.003) were statistically significant. Conclusion: Awareness of sonographic findings of angioleiomyomas based on pathologic subtypes could be helpful for diagnosing angioleiomyoma and could increase diagnostic accuracy for superficial soft-tissue masses in our practice.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Inje University Busan Paik Hospital

References

  1. Jin W, Kim GY, Park SY, Chun YS, Nam DH, Park JS, et al. The spectrum of vascularized superficial soft-tissue tumors on sonography with a histopathologic correlation: Part 1, benign tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:439-445 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3832
  2. Gupte C, Butt SH, Tirabosco R, Saifuddin A. Angioleiomyoma: magnetic resonance imaging features in ten cases. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:1003-1009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0518-4
  3. Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Choi YJ, Chung EC, Rho MH. Sonographic appearances of soft tissue angioleiomyomas: differences from other circumscribed soft tissue hypervascular tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:1589-1595 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.10.1589
  4. Fletcher C. D. M, Unni K. K, Mertens F. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, 1st ed. Lyon: IARC Press, 2002:128-129
  5. Gomez-Dermit V, Gallardo E, Landeras R, Echevarria F, Garcia Barredo R. Subcutaneous angioleiomyomas: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic appearances. J Clin Ultrasound 2006;34:50-54 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20145
  6. Hachisuga T, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Angioleiomyoma. A clinicopathologic reappraisal of 562 cases. Cancer 1984;54:126-130 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19840701)54:1<126::AID-CNCR2820540125>3.0.CO;2-F
  7. Yoo HJ, Choi JA, Chung JH, Oh JH, Lee GK, Choi JY, et al. Angioleiomyoma in soft tissue of extremities: MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:W291-W294 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3952
  8. Freedman AM, Meland NB. Angioleiomyomas of the extremities: report of a case and review of the Mayo Clinic experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:328-331 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198902000-00024
  9. Zhang JZ, Zhou J, Zhang ZC. Subcutaneous angioleiomyoma: clinical and sonographic features with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:1669-1673 https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.06056
  10. Smith J, Wisniewski SJ, Lee RA. Sonographic and clinical features of angioleiomyoma presenting as a painful Achilles tendon mass. J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:1365-1368 https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2006.25.10.1365
  11. Hwang JW, Ahn JM, Kang HS, Suh JS, Kim SM, Seo JW. Vascular leiomyoma of an extremity: MR imaging-pathology correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:981-985 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762979