DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is It Better to Enter a Volume CT Dose Index Value before or after Scan Range Adjustment for Radiation Dose Optimization of Pediatric Cardiothoracic CT with Tube Current Modulation?

  • Goo, Hyun Woo (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2017.11.10
  • Accepted : 2018.01.05
  • Published : 2018.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the body size-adapted volume computed tomography (CT) dose index ($CTD_{vol}$) in pediatric cardiothoracic CT with tube current modulation is better to be entered before or after scan range adjustment for radiation dose optimization. Materials and Methods: In 83 patients, cardiothoracic CT with tube current modulation was performed with the body sizeadapted $CTDI_{vol}$ entered after (group 1, n = 42) or before (group 2, n = 41) scan range adjustment. Patient-related, radiation dose, and image quality parameters were compared and correlated between the two groups. Results: The $CTDI_{vol}$ after the CT scan in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 ($1.7{\pm}0.1mGy$ vs. $1.4{\pm}0.3mGy$; p < 0.0001). Image noise ($4.6{\pm}0.5$ Hounsfield units [HU] vs. $4.5{\pm}0.7HU$) and image quality ($1.5{\pm}0.6$ vs. $1.5{\pm}0.6$) showed no significant differences between the two (p > 0.05). In both groups, all patient-related parameters, except body density, showed positive correlations (r = 0.49-0.94; p < 0.01) with the $CTDI_{vol}$ before and after the CT scan. The $CTDI_{vol}$ after CT scan showed modest positive correlation (r = 0.49; $p{\leq}0.001$) with image noise in group 1 but no significant correlation (p > 0.05) in group 2. Conclusion: In pediatric cardiothoracic CT with tube current modulation, the $CTDI_{vol}$ entered before scan range adjustment provides a significant dose reduction (18%) with comparable image quality compared with that entered after scan range adjustment.

Keywords

References

  1. Greenwood TJ, Lopez-Costa RI, Rhoades PD, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Starr M, Street M, et al. CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: a multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics 2015;35:1539-1554 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140267
  2. Goo HW. CT radiation dose optimization and estimation: an update for radiologists. Korean J Radiol 2012;13:1-11 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.1
  3. Goo HW. State-of-the-art CT imaging techniques for congenital heart disease. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:4-18 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.1.4
  4. Greess H, Lutze J, Nomayr A, Wolf H, Hothorn T, Kalender WA, et al. Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2004;14:995-999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2301-9
  5. Goo HW, Suh DS. Tube current reduction in pediatric non-ECGgated heart CT by combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:344-351 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0105-y
  6. Cody DD. Management of auto exposure control during pediatric computed tomography. Pediatr Radiol 2014;44 Suppl 3:427-430 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3140-8
  7. Soderberg M. Overview, practical tips and potential pitfalls of using automatic exposure control in CT: Siemens CARE Dose 4D. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016;169:84-91 https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv459
  8. Solomon JB, Li X, Samei E. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:592-600 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.8580
  9. Jung YY, Goo HW. The optimal parameter for radiation dose in pediatric low dose abdominal CT: cross-sectional dimensions versus body weight. J Korean Radiol Soc 2008;58:169-175 https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2008.58.2.169
  10. Dong F, Davros W, Pozzuto J, Reid J. Optimization of kilovoltage and tube current-exposure time product based on abdominal circumference: an oval phantom study for pediatric abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:670-676 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6153
  11. Menke J. Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 2005;236:565-571 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2362041327
  12. Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys 2012;39:6764-6771
  13. Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X, Leng S, Yu L, McCollough CH. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 2012;39:6772-6778
  14. Goo HW. Individualized volume CT dose index determined by cross-sectional area and mean density of the body to achieve uniform image noise of contrast-enhanced pediatric chest CT obtained at variable kV levels and with combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:839-847 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2121-4
  15. Goo HW, Allmendinger T. Combined electrocardiography- and respiratory-triggered CT of the lung to reduce respiratory misregistration artifacts between imaging slabs in freebreathing children: initial experience. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:860-866 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.5.860
  16. Kaasalainen T, Palmu K, Reijonen V, Kortesniemi M. Effect of patient centering on patient dose and image noise in chest CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:123-130 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.12028
  17. Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ, Goske MJ. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model. Radiology 2013;269:167-176 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122320
  18. Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM, Podberesky DJ. System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part II. Process control system. Radiology 2013;269:177-185 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122321
  19. Li B, Behrman RH, Norbash AM. Comparison of topogrambased body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization. Med Phys 2012;39:3456-3465 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4718569
  20. Ikuta I, Warden GI, Andriole KP, Khorasani R, Sodickson A. Estimating patient dose from x-ray tube output metrics: automated measurement of patient size from CT images enables large-scale size-specific dose estimates. Radiology 2014;270:472-480 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13122727
  21. Kuo F, Plaza M, Saigal G. Inappropriate arm positioning during scout image acquisition resulting in increased radiation dose while performing a chest CT. Pediatr Radiol 2012;42:508-509 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2292-z
  22. Goo HW, Suh DS. The influences of tube voltage and scan direction on combined tube current modulation: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:833-840 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0177-3
  23. Israel GM, Herlihy S, Rubinowitz AN, Cornfeld D, Brink J. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:140-144 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3019
  24. Hui PKT, Goo HW, Du J, Ip JJK, Kanzaki S, Kim YJ, et al. Asian consortium on radiation dose of pediatric cardiac CT (ASCIREDCARD). Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:899-910 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3847-4
  25. Toth T, Ge Z, Daly MP. The influence of patient centering on CT dose and image noise. Med Phys 2007;34:3093-3101 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2748113

Cited by

  1. Coronary artery anomalies on preoperative cardiac CT in children with tetralogy of Fallot or Fallot type of double outlet right ventricle: comparison with surgical findings vol.34, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1422-1
  2. A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0928
  3. Semiautomatic Three-Dimensional Threshold-Based Cardiac Computed Tomography Ventricular Volumetry in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: Comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging vol.20, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0237
  4. User-Friendly Vendor-Specific Guideline for Pediatric Cardiothoracic Computed Tomography Provided by the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Congenital Heart Disease Study Group: Part 1. Imaging T vol.20, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0571
  5. Technical feasibility of semiautomatic three-dimensional threshold-based cardiac computed tomography quantification of left ventricular mass vol.49, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4303-9
  6. Changes in Right Ventricular Volume, Volume Load, and Function Measured with Cardiac Computed Tomography over the Entire Time Course of Tetralogy of Fallot vol.20, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0891
  7. Quantification of Initial Right Ventricular Dimensions by Computed Tomography in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease and a Hypoplastic Right Ventricle vol.21, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0662
  8. Pattern Analysis of Left Ventricular Remodeling Using Cardiac Computed Tomography in Children with Congenital Heart Disease: Preliminary Results vol.21, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0689
  9. Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency vol.21, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1322
  10. Comparison of quantitative image quality of cardiac computed tomography between raw-data-based and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms with an emphasis on image sharpness vol.50, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04741-x
  11. Review of the Asian Consortium on Radiation Dose of Pediatric Cardiac CT (ASCI-REDCARD) and Recommendations for a New Edition vol.5, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2021.00269