DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultrasonographic Echogenicity and Histopathologic Correlation of Thyroid Nodules in Core Needle Biopsy Specimens

  • Kim, Ji-hoon (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Na, Dong Gyu (Department of Radiology, GangNeung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Hunkyung (Department of Pathology, Ewha Clinical Laboratory)
  • Received : 2017.08.28
  • Accepted : 2018.01.16
  • Published : 2018.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To determine the histopathologic features associated with ultrasonographic echogenicity of thyroid nodules. Materials and Methods: This study included 95 nodules of 95 patients (76 women, 19 men; mean age $47.5{\pm}12.9years$) with homogeneous echogenicity in which core needle biopsy was performed during a one year period. The nodule echogenicity was categorized into 4 grades (hyperechogenicity, isoechogenicity, mild hypoechogenicity, and marked hypoechogenicity). The biopsy specimens were evaluated by a pathologist regarding the histopathologic features of fibrosis, lymphoid infiltration, microfollicular pattern, uniform follicular pattern, and hypercellularity in nodules. We evaluated the association of each histopathologic feature among 3 categories of nodule echogenicity by multinomial regression analysis. Results: The nodule echogenicity was isoechoic in 28 (29.5%), mildly hypoechoic in 37 (38.9%), and markedly hypoechoic in 30 (31.6%), and there was no hyperechoic nodule. There was a trend of increasing frequency of fibrosis (> 30%) as nodule echogenicity decreased (isoechogenicity, 10.7%; mild hypoechogenicity, 32.4%; and marked hypoechogenicity, 80%; p < 0.001). The microfollicular pattern, uniform follicular pattern, and hypercellularity were frequently found in mildly hypoechoic nodules than in isoechoic nodules ($p{\leq}0.018$). The fibrosis (> 30%) and hypercellularity were independently associated with mild or marked hypoechogenicity as compared to isoechogenicity (fibrosis; $p{\leq}0.004$ and hypercellularity; $p{\leq}0.036$), and only fibrosis (> 30%) was independently associated with marked hypoechogenicity as compared to mild hypoechogenicity (p = 0.004). Conclusion: The fibrosis (> 30%) and high cellularity are independently associated with mild or marked hypoechogenicity of nodules. The knowledge of the relationship of echogenicity and histopathology of thyroid nodules could improve management of patients with thyroid nodules.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Seoul National University Hospital

References

  1. Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, et al.; Thyroid Study Group, Korean Society of Neuro- and Head and Neck Radiology. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008;247:762-770 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473070944
  2. Na DG, Baek JH, Sung JY, Kim JH, Kim JK, Choi YJ, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system risk stratification of thyroid nodules: categorization based on solidity and echogenicity. Thyroid 2016;26:562-572 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2015.0460
  3. Ha EJ, Moon WJ, Na DG, Lee YH, Choi N, Kim SJ, et al. A multicenter prospective validation study for the Korean thyroid imaging reporting and data system in patients with thyroid nodules. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:811-821 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.811
  4. Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of thyroid nodule risk stratification using the American College of radiology thyroid imaging reporting and data system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208:1331-1341 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17613
  5. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, Durante C, Ngu R, Leenhardt L. European Thyroid Association Guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: the EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J 2017;6:225-237 https://doi.org/10.1159/000478927
  6. Chen SJ, Yu SN, Tzeng JE, Chen YT, Chang KY, Cheng KS, et al. Characterization of the major histopathological components of thyroid nodules using sonographic textural features for clinical diagnosis and management. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35:201-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.08.017
  7. Jung SL, Jung CK, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Ahn KJ, Kim BS, et al. Histopathologic findings related to the indeterminate or inadequate results of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and correlation with ultrasonographic findings in papillary thyroid carcinomas. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:141-148 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.2.141
  8. Na DG, Min HS, Lee H, Won JK, Seo HB, Kim JH. Role of core needle biopsy in the management of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules: comparison with repeat fine-needle aspiration in subcategory nodules. Eur Thyroid J 2015;4:189-196 https://doi.org/10.1159/000437051
  9. Na DG, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim JH, Sung JY, Kim KS, et al. Core needle biopsy of the thyroid: 2016 Consensus Statement and Recommendations from Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:217-237 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.217
  10. Baek JH. Current status of core needle biopsy of the thyroid. Ultrasonography 2017;36:83-85 https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.17018
  11. Jung CK, Min HS, Park HJ, Song DE, Kim JH, Park SY, et al.; Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy Study Group. Pathology reporting of thyroid core needle biopsy: a proposal of the Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy Study Group. J Pathol Transl Med 2015;49:288-299 https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2015.06.04
  12. Rosai J, Carcangiu ML, DeLelli RA. Atlas of tumor pathology: tumors of the thyroid gland. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1992:21-63
  13. Rumack CM, Wilson SR, Charboneau JW, Johnson JM. Diagnostic ultrasound, 3rd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2005:3-34
  14. Jung CK, Baek JH. Recent advances in core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017;32:407-412 https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2017.32.4.407
  15. Isarangkul W. Dense fibrosis. Another diagnostic criterion for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993;117:645-646
  16. Ko MS, Jeong KS, Shong YK, Gong GY, Baek JH, Lee JH. Collapsing benign cystic nodules of the thyroid gland: sonographic differentiation from papillary thyroid carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:124-127 https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2732
  17. Lacout A, Chevenet C, Marcy PY. Mummified thyroid syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:837-845 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.15267
  18. Lee HY, Baek JH, Ha EJ, Park JW, Lee JH, Song DE, et al. Malignant-looking thyroid nodules with size reduction: core needle biopsy results. Ultrasonography 2016;35:327-334 https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.15082

Cited by

  1. Degenerating Thyroid Nodules: Ultrasound Diagnosis, Clinical Significance, and Management vol.20, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0599
  2. Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy Techniques for Intermediate or Low Suspicion Thyroid Nodules: Which Method is Effective for Diagnosis? vol.20, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0841
  3. Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency vol.21, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1322
  4. Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture vol.30, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06527-8
  5. Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Core Needle Biopsy as a First-Line Diagnostic Method for Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Cohort Study vol.30, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0444
  6. Usage and Diagnostic Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published by Korean Authors vol.14, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2020.00199
  7. Computer-Analyzed Ultrasound Predictors of the Treatment Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules vol.46, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06340-9