Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors on the Types of Leisure Activity Participation for the Disabled persons in Korea

내 장애인의 여가활동 참여유형에 관한 요인

  • Lim, Young-Myoung (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Konyang University) ;
  • Cha, Tae-Hyun (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Konyang University)
  • 임영명 (건양대학교 일반대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 차태현 (건양대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2018.06.14
  • Accepted : 2018.08.20
  • Published : 2018.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of leisure barriers on participation type of leisure activities in disabled in Korea. The raw data variable of '2014 Disabled People Status Survey' were categorized as internal/external barriers and leisure type. The type of participation in leisure activities according to general characteristics was performed descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation and multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the correlation and causal relationships of types of internal/external constraints and leisure activity participation. The element that effects on a level of current passive leisure activity type, it resulted as two variables of internal barriers, three variables of external barriers, the explanation ability was analysed as to 48%. it resulted as two variables of internal barriers, five variables of external barriers in active leisure activity, five variables of external barriers, the explanation ability was analysed as to 29%. Therefore, based on various constraints of disabled people in Korea, a plan should be prepared to encourage participation of leisure activity, and systematic review and detailed study on two academic subjects related to leisure and disability should be done.

본 연구는 국내 장애인의 여가제약 요인이 여가활동 참여유형에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. '2014년 장애인 실태조사'의 원자료 변수를 내적제약과 외적제약 요인 그리고 여가활동은 수동적/능동적 참여유형으로 분류하여 분석하였다. 일반적 특성에 따른 여가활동 참여유형은 기술통계를 실시하였으며, 내적/외적제약과 여가활동 참여유형의 상관관계와 인과관계를 살펴보기 위해 피어슨 상관분석과 다중회귀분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 수동적 여가활동 유형에 영향을 미치는 요인은 내적제약 2개, 외적제약 3개 변인의 설명력은 48%, 능동적 여가활동은 내적제약 2개, 외적제약 5개 변인으로 나타났으며 설명력은 29%로 분석되었다. 결과적으로 국내 장애인들의 다양한 제약요인을 바탕으로 여가활동의 참여 촉진을 위해 방안이 마련되어야하며, 여가와 장애에 관련된 두 학문적 주제에 대하여 체계적인 검토와 세부적인 연구가 이루어져야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Government Legislation. (2015). Disabled person Welfare law. Law No 13663.
  2. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2014). 2014 Disabled People Status Survey.
  3. D. Y. Lee. (2014). A study on the quality of life and happiness index of the 5th Panel Survey of Employment for the Disabled. Disability & employment, 24(3) 99-122. https://doi.org/10.15707/disem.2014.24.3.004
  4. P. J. Chang, L. Wray & Y. Lin. (2014). Social relationships, leisure activity, and health in older adults. Health Psychology, 33(6), 516. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000051
  5. J. Kim, M. Kim, E. MaloneBeach & A. Han. (2016). A study of health perception, disability acceptance, and life satisfaction based on types of leisure activity among Koreans with a physical disability. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(3), 791-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9397-8
  6. R. Pagan. (2015). How do leisure activities impact on life satisfaction? Evidence for German people with disabilities. Applied research in quality of life, 10(4), 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9333-3
  7. D. Blacker, L. Broadhurst & L. Teixeira. (2008). The role of occupational therapy in leisure adaptation with complex neurological disability: a discussion using two case study examples. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(4), 313-319.
  8. I. Brown. (2003). Quality of life and disability: An approach for community practitioners. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  9. D. A. Francken & W. F. Van Raaij. (1981). Satisfaction with leisure time activities. Journal of leisure Research, 13(4), 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1981.11969498
  10. D. W. Crawford & G. Godbey. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure sciences, 9(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512151
  11. S. J. Schleien, M. T. Ray & F. P. Green. (1997). Community recreation and people with disabilities: Strategies for inclusion. PH Brookes Pub.
  12. B. Hawkins. (1997). Promoting quality of life through leisure and recreation. 1997). Quality of Life: Application to persons with disabilities, 2, 117-129.
  13. D. A. Kleiber. (1980). Free time activity and psycho-social adjustment in college students: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(3), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1980.11969445
  14. L. L. Caldwell & A. A. Gilbert. (2009). Leisure, health, and disability: A review and discussion. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 9(2), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.7870/cjcmh-1990-0022
  15. Y. H. Jeong. (2013). The Relationship between Leisure Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in the Case of the Disabled Who Had Participated in Leisure Activities. Tourism Institute of Northeast Asia, 9(1), 215-233.
  16. D. W. Kim. (2017). A study on the relationship between participation in life sports of people with physical disabilities on community attachment. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(7), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.7.305
  17. E. K. Yun. (2007). Influence of leisure activities participation by the adult disabled on life satisfaction : based on the disabled with physical disabilities and brain disorder (Master's thesis). Catholoc University of Korea. Seoul.
  18. F. A. McGuire. (1984). A factor analytic study of leisure constraints in advanced adulthood.
  19. L. A. Raymore. (2002). Facilitators to leisure. Journal of Leisure research, 34(1), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949959
  20. T. Kay & G. Jackson. (1991). Leisure despite constraint: The impact of leisure constraints on leisure participation. Journal of leisure research, 23(4), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1991.11969862
  21. L. McAvoy. (2001). Outdoors for Everyone: Opportunities that Include People with Disabilities. Parks & Recreation, 36(8).
  22. D. G. Hong, H. Y. Jeong, J. H. Park, S. K. Kim. (2015). The Effect of a Leisure Motivation and Participation Restriction of Stroke Patients on Level of Leisure Activity. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 23(3), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2015.23.3.02
  23. C. K. Oh, I. H. Park & H. Jang. (2014). Intermediary Effect of Leisure Restrictions in the Relationship between Leisure Activity Type of Leisure Satisfaction on Physically Disabled People. Korea Academy of disability and Welfare, 27-46.
  24. D. W. Kim. (2015). Wheelchair tennis has ever fusion of classroom participation of the physically disabled basic psychological needs and exercise emotional and exercise commitment. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 6(4), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.4.015
  25. C. Aitchison. (2009). Exclusive discourses: Leisure studies and disability. Leisure Studies, 28(4), 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360903125096
  26. K. A. Henderson, D. Stalnaker & G. Taylor. (1988). The relationship between barriers to recreation and gender-role personality traits for women. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1988.11969758
  27. K. Alexandris, C. Tsorbatzoudis & G. Grouios. (2002). Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(3), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949970
  28. J. K. Lee, D. K. Kim & M. S. Lee. (2007). Influences of Leisure time and Leisure activity pattern according to implementation of 40-time workweek system on the changes of satisfaction with Leisure, job, and Life of Korean employees. Korean journal of physical eduaction, 46(2), 301-316.