수산경영론집 (The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration)

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.1-19
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1225-1011(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1727(eISSN)
한국수산경영학회 (The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IPA를 이용한 수산물 선택속성의 중요도-만족도 분석 : 가공정도에 따른 차이를 중심으로

Study on the Importance and Satisfaction of Seafood Purchase Attributes by IPA - Focused on the process differences -

  • 박정아 (부경대학교 해양수산경영학과)
  • Park, Jeong-A (Department of Marine & Fisheries Business and Economics, Pukyong National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.21
  • 심사 : 2018.06.04
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was targeted on the non-processed, semi-processed, and full-processed seafood to investigate the consumers' importance and satisfaction levels of purchase attributes for each seafood product. The present study conducted a survey on 335 randomly chosen seafood consumers. Respondents' importance-satisfaction scores of purchase attributes were measured. The results were as follows. The importance of purchase attributes was significantly higher than the satisfaction on 21 out of 23 attributes, according to the non-processed, semi-processed, and full-processed seafood(p<0.05). Consumers regarded intrinsic attributes such as 'freshness' of products as very important when purchasing non-processed seafood, and their satisfaction was also high. On the other hand, for semi-processed and full-processed seafood, external attributes such as 'date of manufacture or expiration date' were considered as more important attributes to purchase them. Consumers also perceived that full-processed seafood was less in quantity and more expensive than non-processed and semi-processed ones. In case of semi-processed seafood, the difference of importance-satisfaction score for 'taste' was large, and it was considered the taste should be improved according to consumers' taste.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, J. H. and Kang, K O. (2006), "Consumption Type of Housewives about Organic and Instant Food," Korean J. Food Nutr., 19 (1), 28-37.
  2. Baek, E. Y. and Lee, W. G. (2016), "A Survey on Consumers' Purchasing Pattern for Laver," J Korean island, 28 (2), 139-158.
  3. Bridgenews (2018), Press Releases, accessed March 03, 2018 [available at http://www.viva100.com/main/view.php?key=20180305010001405].
  4. Cassano, J. (1999), "Home meal replacement: a home run with consumers," Consumer Insight magazine, ACNielsen, 9-12.
  5. Dailian (2017), Press Releases, accessed March 03, 2018 [available at http://www.dailian.co.kr/news/view/651502].
  6. Engel, F. J. and Blackwell, D. R. (1982), Consumer Behavior, 4nd ed., Dryden Press, 1-690.
  7. Jang Y. S. and Park, J. A. (2009), "A Study on the Evaluation Factors of Seafood Purchase for School Food Service," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 40 (2), 1-25.
  8. Jang, J. S. and Hong, M. S. (2016), "A Comparative Study on the Dietary Behavior and Recognition on Food Labelling of Processed Foods according to the Degree of Health Concern in University Students," Korean J. Food Nutr., 29 (4), 529-537. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2016.29.4.529
  9. Jeong, J. Y. (2011), "A Study on the impact of Attributes and Benefits for Convenience Foods on overall satisfaction : focus on the Independent Restaurant Employees," Master Thesis, Sejong Univ., Seoul, Korea.
  10. Jung, Y. H. (2016), "A Study on the Effects of Marketing Mix Strategy and Product Selection Attributes on Customer Satisfaction and Purchase Behavior of Processed Foods: With the Moderating Roles of Consumer's Affectivity," Doctoral Thesis, Catholic Kwandong Univ., Gangneung, Korea.
  11. Jung, K. S. (2012), "Study on Processed Foods Purchase Decision Factors in Open Market," The e-Business Studies, 23 (1), 269-290.
  12. Kim, D. O., Kim, S. J., Kim, Y. N., Bea, J. H. and Jung, H. J. (2017), "Marketing for consumers focusing on cost-effective consumption," Marketing, 51 (1), 62-70.
  13. Kim, J. H. and Ryu, K. S. (2014), "The Effects of Consumption Value to HMR Brand on Brand Satisfaction, Brand Trust, and Brand Loyalty," J Foodservice Management, 17 (2), 135-160.
  14. Kim, J. S. (2011), "Study for the Selection Attributes and Benefits of Processed Fishery Products," Doctoral Thesis, Hoseo Univ., Seoul, Korea.
  15. Kim, J. Y. and Ahn, B. I. (2015), "Effect of Consumers' Dietary Lifestyle on the Consumption Pattern of Processed Foods," J food marketing economics, 32 (1), 31-53.
  16. Kim, S. W. and Jang, Y. H. (2014). "A Study on the Relationship of Brand Equity Components of Agricultural Products, Brand Attitude and Repurchase Intention," Journal of Marketing, 22 (4), 223-237
  17. Korea agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation (2015), "Food Industry Information Planning and Analysis Report (IV): Food Consumption Trend," 1-101.
  18. Korea agro-Fisheries and Food Trade Corporation (2017), "2017 Processed food market segment status: ready-to-eat food products," 1-5.
  19. Korea Rural Economic Institute (2017), "The consumer behavior survey for food 2017," 29-54.
  20. Lee, J. S., Oh, H. K. and Choi, K. S. (2015) "A Study on Utilization of Processed Foods and Recognition of Food Labels among University Students," Korean J. Food Nutr., 28 (1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2015.28.1.024
  21. Lim, S. H., Kim, J. U. and Jang, Y. S. (2017), "A Study on the Positioning of Sliced Raw Fish Market by Selection Attributes," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 48 (2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2017.48.2.053
  22. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2017), "Statistics of the Korean Food and Drug Industry Trend in 2017," 28-37.
  23. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2015), "Korean Food Standards Codex," accessed October 11, 2017 [Available at http://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr].
  24. Oliver, R. L. (1993), "Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response," Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1086/209358
  25. Park, H. J. (2016), "A Study on the Image of Rice and Importance-Performance Analysis Regarding Selection Attributes of the Rice-convenience food," Master Thesis, Ewha Womans Univ., Seoul, Korea.
  26. Park, J. A. (2008), "Study on the Evaluation of Seafood for School Food Service," Master Thesis, Pukyong Natl Univ., Busan, Korea.
  27. Park, J. A. and Jang Y. S. (2014), "An Analysis on the Changes of Seafood Consumption Patterns by Demographic Characteristics," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 45 (3), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2014.45.3.001
  28. Park, J. A. and Jang Y. S. (2016), "The Effects of the Consumers' Beliefs of Seafood Certifications on The Behavioral Intention Biases in Making Certified Product purchases : Focused on Seasoned Laver," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 47 (3), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2016.47.3.071
  29. Park, J. A. and Jang, Y. S. (2017), "The Study on Comsumer Beliefs about Selection Attributes of Home Meal Replacement(HMR) and Purchasing Intention Biases for the HMR," J Foodservice Management, 20 (3), 101-126.
  30. Park, S. B., Lee, H. J., Kim, H. Y., Hwang, H. S., Park, D. S. and Hong, W. S. (2016), "A Study on Domestic Consumers' Needs and Importance-Performance Analysis of Selective Attributes for Developing Home Meal Replacement (HMR) Products," Korean J Food Cook Sci, 32 (3), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.3.342
  31. Seo, I. W. (2002), "A study about the analysis of productivity of Japanese restaurants in hotel according to the degree of processing of food materials," Master Thesis, Kyonggi Univ., Suwon, Korea.
  32. So, W. H. and Kim, H. K. (2013), "Effects of the Enterprise Image in Korean Processed Marine Product Industry on Consumers' Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 44 (1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2013.44.1.001
  33. Statistics Korea (2016), "The survey of household finances and living conditions Korea," accessed October 12, 2017 [available at http://kosis.kr].
  34. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), "Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence," Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302