Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제43권3호
  • /
  • Pages.29.1-29.13
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Elkaffas, Ali. A. (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University) ;
  • Hamama, Hamdi H.H. (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University) ;
  • Mahmoud, Salah H. (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.04
  • 심사 : 2018.05.08
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: The aims of this study were to conduct a systematic review of the microtensile bond strength (${\mu}TBS$) of multi-mode adhesives to dentin and to perform a meta-analysis to assess the significance of differences in the ${\mu}TBS$ of one of the most commonly used universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal, 3M ESPE) depending on whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode was used. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost. Laboratory studies that evaluated the ${\mu}TBS$ of multi-mode adhesives to dentin using either the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode were selected. A meta-analysis was conducted of the reviewed studies to quantify the differences in the ${\mu}TBS$ of Scotchbond Universal adhesive. Results: Only 10 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Extensive variation was found in the restorative materials, testing methodologies, and failure mode in the reviewed articles. Furthermore, variation was also observed in the dimensions of the microtensile testing beams. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes for Scotchbond Universal adhesive (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Multi-mode 'universal' adhesives can achieve substantial bonding to dentin, regardless of the used modes (either etch-and-rinse or self-etch).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Richards D, Lawrence A. Evidence based dentistry. Br Dent J 1995;179:270-273. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808896
  2. Forrest JL. Evidence-based decision making: a translational guide for dental professionals. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
  3. Toledano M, Osorio R, Moreira MA, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA, Gea P, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Effect of the hydration status of the smear layer on the wettability and bond strength of a self-etching primer to dentin. Am J Dent 2004;17:310-314.
  4. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  5. Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Broome JC, editors. Summitt's fundamentals of operative dentistry: a contemporary approach. Hanover Park (IL): Quintessence Publishing Company Incorporated; 2013.
  6. Lopes GC, Vieira LC, Monteiro S Jr, Caldeira de Andrada MA, Baratieri CM. Dentin bonding: effect of degree of mineralization and acid etching time. Oper Dent 2003;28:429-439.
  7. Wang T, Nikaido T, Nakabayashi N. Photocure bonding agent containing phosphoric methacrylate. Dent Mater 1991;7:59-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90029-X
  8. Van Landuyt KL, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Okazaki M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008;87:757-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700804
  9. Carvalho RM, Pegoraro TA, Tay FR, Pegoraro LF, Silva NR, Pashley DH. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004;32:55-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2003.08.003
  10. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, Van Landuyt KL, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Minagi S, Van Meerbeek B. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater 2011;7:3187-3195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.026
  11. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012;91:376-381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512437375
  12. Fujisawa S, Kadoma Y, Komoda Y. Hemolysis mechanism of dental adhesive monomer (methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate) using a phosphatidylcholine liposome system as a model for biomembranes. Dent Mater J 1990;9:136-146. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.9.136
  13. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 2006;85:941-944. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501014
  14. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength--evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  15. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42:800-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012
  16. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--old wine in new bottles? J Dent 2015;43:525-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004
  17. Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, Loguercio AD. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2015;40:282-292. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-055-L
  18. Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Szesz AL, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH, Perdigao J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the bonding efficacy of three universal adhesives. J Dent 2014;42:595-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.013
  19. Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2012;25:153-158.
  20. Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2014;30:1126-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002
  21. Munoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41:404-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001
  22. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent 2012;40:475-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.012
  23. Eren D, Bektas OO, Siso SH. Three different adhesive systems; three different bond strength test methods. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71:978-983. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.741696
  24. Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent 2014;39:489-499. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-LR
  25. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  26. Greenhalgh T. Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). BMJ 1997;315:672-675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.672
  27. Linde K, Willich SN. How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine. J R Soc Med 2003;96:17-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680309600105
  28. Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC, Geraldeli S, Loguercio AD. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:877-885. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0281
  29. Waidyasekera K, Nikaido T, Weerasinghe DS, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: a new concept. J Dent 2009;37:604-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.021
  30. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Mine A, Nakamura M, Minagi S, Osaka A, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010;6:3573-3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.024
  31. Turp V, Sen D, Tuncelli B, Ozcan M. Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etch-and-rinse technique. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:226-233. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.226
  32. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
  33. Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, Tjaderhane L, Carvalho RM, Carrilho M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016
  34. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
  35. Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Falconi M, Petschelt A, Breschi L. Influence of preliminary etching on the stability of bonds created by one-step self-etch bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:239-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00960.x
  36. Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Yiu C, Huang C, Prati C, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2004;83:459-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300605
  37. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. Thirteen-year randomized controlled clinical trial of a two-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 2015;31:308-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.005
  38. Hamama HH, Yiu CK, Burrow MF, King NM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on chemomechanical caries removal. Oper Dent 2015;40:E167-E178. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-021-LIT

피인용 문헌

  1. Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve the Longevity of Resinous Restorations vol.20, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030723
  2. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance pp.15524973, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34305
  3. Laboratory methods for measuring adhesive bond strength between restoration materials and hard tooth tissues vol.100, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202110005188
  4. Adhesion strategy and curing mode of a universal adhesive influence the bonding of dual-cured core build-up resin composite to dentin vol.35, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1786907
  5. Effect of Curcumin Suspension and Vitamin C on Dentin Shear Bond Strength and Durability. A Pilot Study vol.15, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010540
  6. Does Adhesive Layer Thickness and Tag Length Influence Short/Long-Term Bond Strength of Universal Adhesive Systems? An In-Vitro Study vol.11, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062635
  7. Chronological history and current advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review vol.35, pp.18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1865611