Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제15권2호
  • /
  • Pages.179-191
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dynamic performance of a composite building structure under seismic ground motions

  • Tsai, Meng-Hao (Department of Civil Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Zhang, Junfei (School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, The University of Western Australia) ;
  • Song, Yih-Ping (Department of Civil Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lu, Jun-Kai (Department of Civil Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.05
  • 심사 : 2018.05.08
  • 발행 : 2018.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study is aimed at investigating the dynamic performance of a composite building structure under seismic ground motions. The building structure is an official fire department building located in southern Taiwan. It is composed of a seven-story reinforced concrete (RC) and an eight-story steel reinforced concrete (SRC) frame. Both frames share a common basement and are separated by expansion joints from the first to the seventh floor. Recorded floor accelerations of the building structure under eight earthquakes occurring during the period from 2011 to 2013 were examined in this paper. It is found that both frames had similar floor acceleration amplifications in the longitudinal direction, while the SRC frame revealed larger response than the RC frame in the transverse direction. Almost invariant and similar fundamental periods under the eight earthquakes in both directions were obtained from their transfer functions. Furthermore, numerical time-history simulations were carried out for the building structure under the most intensive earthquake. It is realized that the seismic response of the composite building was dominated by the first translational mode in each horizontal direction. Higher modes did not significantly contribute to the structural response. The conventional Rayleigh damping model could be appropriately applied to the time-history simulations under bi-directional excitations. Approximate floor acceleration envelopes were obtained with a compound RC and SRC structural model by using the average damping ratios determined from the different structural arrays.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ansari, F. (2005), Sensing Issues in Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham (ZG), Switzerland.
  2. ASCE (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia.
  3. Bikce, M. and Celik, T.B. (2016), "Failure analysis of newly constructed RC buildings designed according to 2007 Turkish Seismic Code during the October 23, 2011 Van earthquake", Eng. Fail. Anal., 64, 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.03.008
  4. Bradford, S.C., Clinton, J.F., Favela, J. and Heaton, T.H. (2004), "Results of Millikan library forced vibration testing", Caltech EERL-2004-03, California Institute of Technology.
  5. Celebi, M. (2004), "Structural monitoring arrays-past, present and future", Proceedings of NATO Workshop on Future Directions on Strong Motion and Engineering Seismology, Kusadasi, Izmir, Turkey, May.
  6. Celebi, M., Sanli, A., Sinclair, M., Gallant, S. and Radulescu, D. (2004), "Real-time seismic monitoring needs of a building owner-and the solution: a cooperative effort", Earthq. Spectra, 20(2), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1735987
  7. Chopra, A.K. (1995), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  8. Clinton, J.F., Bradford, S.C., Heaton, T.H. and Favela, J. (2006), "The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 96(1), 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050052
  9. CPA (1997), Seismic Design Code and Commentary for Buildings, Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of Interior Affair, Taipei, Taiwan. (in Chinese)
  10. Cruz, C. and Miranda, E. (2016), "Evaluation of damping ratios for the seismic analysis of tall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 143(1), 04016144-1-10.
  11. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. and Shevitz, D.W. (1996), "Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review", Los Alamos National Lab., NM.
  12. FEMA (2003), "NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures", Report No. FEMA 450, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  13. Garevski, M. (2013) Earthquakes and Health Monitoring of Civil Structure, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham (ZG), Switzerland.
  14. Gilsanz, R., Huang, C., Mandrick, J., Mugford, J., Steficek, C., Celebi, M. and Jhuang, S.J. (2016), "Learning from the recent Taiwan Meinong earthquake", Proceedings of the 2016 SEAOC Convention, Maui, HI, October.
  15. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1998), "Period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 124(4), 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(426)
  16. ICC (1997), Uniform Building Code, Vol. 2: Structural Engineering Design Provisions, International Code Council, Whittier, CA.
  17. Inel, M. and Meral, E. (2016), "Seismic performance of RC buildings subjected to past earthquakes in Turkey", Earthq. Struct., 11(3), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.483
  18. Irie, Y. and Nakamura, K. (2000), "Dynamic characteristics of a R/C building of five stories based on microtremor measurements and earthquake observations", Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE), Auckland, New Zealand, January-February.
  19. Isik, E. and Kutanis, M. (2015), "Performance based assessment for existing residential buildings in Lake Van basin and seismicity of the region", Earthq. Struct., 9(4), 893-910. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.4.893
  20. LATBSDC (2011), An Alternative Procedure for Seismic Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings Located in the Los Angeles Region: A Consensus Document, Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council.
  21. Lemnitzer, A., Massone, L.M., Skolnik, D.A., de la Llera Martin, J.C. and Wallace, J.W. (2014), "Aftershock response of RC buildings in Santiago, Chile, succeeding the magnitude 8.8 Maule earthquake", Eng. Struct., 76, 324-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.003
  22. Michel, C., Gueguen, P., Arem, S.E., Mazars, J. and Kotronis, P. (2010), "Full-scale dynamic response of an RC building under weak seismic motions using earthquake recordings, ambient vibrations and modeling", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39, 419-441.
  23. MIDAS (1989), Integrated Solution System for Building and General Structures, MIDAS Information Technology Co., Livonia, MI 48152, USA.
  24. Mihailov, V., Celebi, M. and Talaganov, K. (2000), "Seismic monitoring of structures-an important element of seismic hazard reduction", Proceeding of the 12th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering (12WCEE), Auckland, New Zealand, January-February.
  25. Mucciarelli, M., Masi, A., Gallipoli, M.R., Harabaglia, P., Vona, M., Ponzo, F. and Dolce, M. (2004), "Analysis of RC building dynamic response and soil-building resonance based on data recorded during a damaging earthquake (Molise, Italy, 2002)", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 94(5), 1943-1953. https://doi.org/10.1785/012003186
  26. Ruiz-Pinilla, J.G., Adam, J.M., Perez-Carcel, R., Yusteb, J. and Moraguesa, J.J. (2016), "Learning from RC building structures damaged by the earthquake in Lorca, Spain, in 2011", Eng. Fail. Anal., 68, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.05.013
  27. Sharma, K., Deng, L. and Noguez, C.C. (2016) "Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the April 25, 2015, Gorkha earthquake in Nepal", Eng. Struct., 121, 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.043
  28. Shin, T.C., Tsai, Y.B., Yeh, Y.T., Liu, C.C. and Wu, Y.M. (2002), "Strong-motion instrumentation programs in Taiwan", Int. Handbook Earthq. Eng. Seismol., 81B, 1057-1062.
  29. Skolnik, D., Lei, Y., Yu, E. and Wallace, J.W. (2006), "Identification, model updating, and response prediction of an instrumented 15-story steel-frame building", Earthq. Spectra, 22(3), 781-802. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2219487
  30. Takewaki, I., Fujita, K. and Yoshitomi, S. (2013), "Uncertainties in long-period ground motion and its impact on building structural design: Case study of the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake", Eng. Struct., 49, 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.10.038
  31. Ventura, C.E., Liam Finn, W.D., Lord, J.F. and Fujita, N. (2003), "Dynamic characteristics of a base isolated building from ambient vibration measurements and low level earthquake shaking", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 23, 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00208-7
  32. Yu, E., Skolnik, D., Whang, D.H. and Wallace, J.W. (2008), "Forced vibration testing of a four-story reinforced concrete building utilizing the nees@UCLA mobile field laboratory", Earthq. Spectra, 24(4), 969-995. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2991300

피인용 문헌

  1. Interfacial bond properties and comparison of various interfacial bond stress calculation methods of steel and steel fiber reinforced concrete vol.26, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.26.6.515
  2. Cyclic loading test of abnormal joints in SRC frame-bent main building structure vol.20, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.4.417
  3. Practical Structural Design and Construction of an Innovative Composite Plastic Greenhouse vol.11, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111051