Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Repair Rate of Composite Resin Restorations in Permanent First Molar in Children Under 12 Years Old

12세 이하 아동의 제1대구치 복합레진 수복의 재수복률에 관한 연구

  • Jeong, Yunyeong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Nam, Okhyung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Misun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Kyung Hee University Dental Hospital at Gangdong) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-seol (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Sungchul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 정윤영 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 남옥형 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김미선 (강동경희대학교병원 치과병원 소아치과) ;
  • 이효설 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최성철 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2018.07.13
  • Accepted : 2018.07.31
  • Published : 2018.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Although the frequency of composite resin restoration in children is gradually increasing, there are insufficient researches about the rate of composite resin repair in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the repair rate of composite resin restorations in the permanent first molar in children under 12 years old. This study retrospectively analyzed 169 children treated with composite resin restoration in the permanent first molar from May 2014 to April 2015. According to the location of the tooth, the repair rate was higher in the mandible than maxilla and in the left than right. In the classification of restoration, the repair rate was the highest in the class II cavity, and the repair rate was the lowest in the restoration of the occlusal surface only. Repair rate in two years was 14.8%, and repair hazard ratio decreased with age. The most common reason of composite resin restoration replacement was the secondary caries (74.1%). Within the limits of study, the repair rate of children was higher than that of adult due to the characteristics of children. Therefore, dentists should understand these characteristics and try to reduce the repair rate of composite resin composite restorations.

이번 연구의 목적은 12세 이하의 아동의 제1대구치 복합레진 수복물에 관하여 후향적 연구를 하여 재수복률을 평가하고자 함에 있다. 이번 연구는 2014년 5월부터 2015년 4월까지 경희대학교 치과병원 소아치과를 내원하여, 제1대구치에 복합레진 수복을 진행한 12세 이하의 환자 169명의 재수복률과 그 원인을 분석하였다. 재수복률은 성별에 따라 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았다. 제1대구치의 위치에 따라서 상악보다는 하악이 그리고 우측보다는 좌측에서 재수복률이 높았다. 와동의 종류에 따라서 2급 와동에서 가장 재수복률이 높았고, 교합면만 수복한 경우 재수복률이 가장 낮았다. 2년간의 재수복률은 14.8%로 나타났으며, 연령이 증가함에 따라 재수복의 위험도는 감소하였다. 재수복의 가장 주된 원인은 이차우식(74.1%)이었다. 아동의 영구치 복합레진 수복물의 재수복률은 성인 보다 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 영구치의 맹출도, 환자의 협조도 및 구강위생 관리능력이 중요한 영향을 미치는 것으로 사료되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Schedle A, et al. : Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investing, 7:63-70, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
  2. Forss H, Widstrom E : From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand, 59:57-62, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163501750157090
  3. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Van Dijken JW, Nilsson M, et al . : Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent, 37:673-678, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010
  4. Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO : Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 43:1043-1050, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.005
  5. Hickel R, Manhart J : Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent, 3:45-64, 2001.
  6. Bernardo M, Luis H, DeRouen TA, et al. : Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc, 138:775-783, 2007. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
  7. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjor IA, Wilson NH : Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int, 30:234-242, 1999.
  8. Casagrande L, Seminario AT, Araujo FB, et al. : Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig, 21:847-855, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1832-1
  9. Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E : Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management, 3rd ed. Wiley Blackwell, 7-8, 304, 2015.
  10. Astvaldsdottir A, Dagerhamn J, Nilsson M, et al. : Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults - A systematic review. J Dent, 43:934-954, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.001
  11. Kim IY, Kim JM, Jeong TS, Kim S : 5 Years Evaluation of Composite Restoration on Permanent Fist Molar in Children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 35:110-117, 2008.
  12. Kim JY, Choi KK, Park SJ : Replacement of posterior restorations. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent, 31:460-469, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.6.460
  13. Pallesen U, Van Dijken JW, Hoigaard R, et al. : Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up. J Dent, 41:297-306, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.021
  14. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R : Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent, 29:481-508, 2004.
  15. Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM : Fiveyear clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent, 32:379-383, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.005
  16. Van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K : A four-year clinical evaluation of a highly filled hybrid resin composite in Class II cavities. J Adhes Dent, 7:343-349, 2005.
  17. Milosevic A, Burnside G : The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study. J Dent, 44:13-19, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.10.015
  18. Dennison JB, Straffon LH, More FG : Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc, 121:610-614, 1990. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0216
  19. Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjor IA : Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent, 29:317-324, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00022-7